Different Cooperation of the Arctic Oscillation and the Madden‐Julian Oscillation in the East Asian Cold Events During Early and Late Winter

2019 ◽  
Vol 124 (9) ◽  
pp. 4913-4931 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Song ◽  
Renguang Wu
Keyword(s):  
Arctic Oscillation ◽  
East Asian ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Late Winter ◽  
Madden Julian Oscillation ◽  
Cold Events ◽  
The Arctic Oscillation

Contrasting Impacts of the Arctic Oscillation on Surface Air Temperature Anomalies in Southern China between Early and Middle-to-Late Winter

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 4015-4026 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinqing Zuo ◽  
Hong-Li Ren ◽  
Weijing Li
Keyword(s):  
Mediterranean Sea ◽  
Air Temperature ◽  
Arctic Oscillation ◽  
Southern China ◽  
Phase Relationship ◽  
Surface Air Temperature ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Late Winter ◽  
Upper Level ◽  
The Arctic Oscillation

Abstract In the boreal winter, the Arctic Oscillation (AO) evidently acts to influence surface air temperature (SAT) anomalies in China. This study reveals a large intraseasonal variation in the relationship between the winter AO and southern China SAT anomalies. Specifically, a weak in-phase relationship occurs in December, but a significant out-of-phase relationship occurs in January and February. The authors show that the linkage between the AO and southern China SAT anomalies strongly depends on the AO-associated changes in the Middle East jet stream (MEJS) and that such an AO–MEJS relationship is characterized by a significant difference between early and middle-to-late winter. In middle-to-late winter, the Azores center of high pressure anomalies in the positive AO phase usually extends eastward and yields a significantly anomalous upper-level convergence over the Mediterranean Sea, which can excite a Rossby wave train spanning the Arabian Sea and intensify the MEJS. In early winter, however, the Azores center of the AO is apparently shifted westward and is mainly confined to the Atlantic Ocean; in this case, the associated change in the MEJS is relatively weak. Both observational diagnoses and experiments based on a linearized barotropic model suggest that the MEJS is closely linked to the AO only when the latter generates considerable upper-level convergence anomalies over the Mediterranean Sea. Therefore, the different impacts of the AO on the MEJS and the southern China SAT anomalies between early and middle-to-late winter are primarily attributed to the large intraseasonal zonal migrations of the Azores center of the AO.

scholarly journals Frequency Associations between East Asian Jet Streams and the Temperature over the Barents–Kara Sea Region/Arctic Oscillation in Winter

Climate ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 107
Author(s):  
Yuefeng Li ◽  
Yuxiang Zhu ◽  
Wei Song
Keyword(s):  
East Asia ◽  
Arctic Oscillation ◽  
East Asian ◽  
Kara Sea ◽  
Wavelet Coherence ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Jet Stream ◽  
Jet Streams ◽  
The Arctic Oscillation ◽  
Cross Wavelet

The frequency associations between jet streams over East Asia and the Arctic key temperature at 2 m (AKT2m) in the Barents–Kara Sea region (40°–75° E, 66°–82° N) and the Arctic Oscillation in winter are investigated using continuous wavelet transform, cross-wavelet transform, and wavelet coherence. The cross-wavelet transforms between the AKT2m/Arctic Oscillation and the East Asian polar front jet stream (EAPJ) suggest that the EAPJ is closely related to the AKT2m and Arctic Oscillation on an interannual (3–5-year band) timescale, but the variation in the phase angle denotes a complex frequency connection between the EAPJ and Arctic Oscillation. The squared wavelet coherence suggests that weakening of the EAPJ is associated with the rise in AKT2m during the period of abrupt climate change in East Asia. The EAPJ contains more forced components from the Arctic than the East Asian subtropical jet stream. By comparison, the relationship between AKT2m and the EAPJ is closer than that between the Arctic Oscillation and EAPJ, especially during the period of abrupt climate change in East Asia. This suggests that the EAPJ serves as a bridge for Arctic warming to affect the weather and climate over East Asia in winter. By contrast, the Arctic Oscillation does not play an important part, although it also contains information about the Arctic.

scholarly journals The Interaction of the Madden–Julian Oscillation and the Arctic Oscillation

2005 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuntai Zhou ◽  
Alvin J. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Arctic Oscillation ◽  
Winter Season ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Height Anomaly ◽  
Madden Julian Oscillation ◽  
Regional Effect ◽  
The Pacific ◽  
Action Center ◽  
The Arctic Oscillation

Abstract Tropical and extratropical interactions on the intraseasonal time scale are studied in the context of the Arctic Oscillation (AO) and the Madden–Julian oscillation (MJO). To simplify the discussion, a high (low) MJO phase is defined as strong (suppressed) convective activity over the Indian Ocean. In the Northern Hemisphere (NH) winter season, a high (low) AO phase is found more likely coupled with a high (low) MJO phase. Based on the regressed patterns and composites of various dynamical fields and quantities, possible mechanisms linking the AO and the MJO are examined. The analysis indicates that the MJO influence on extratropical circulations seems more evident than the AO influence on tropical circulations. The MJO interacts with the AO through meridional dispersion of Rossby waves in the Pacific sector. The geopotential height anomaly center over the North Pacific associated with the MJO can either reinforce or offset the AO Pacific action center. As a result, the AO pattern can be greatly affected by the MJO. When the AO and the MJO are in the same (opposite) phase, the Pacific action center becomes much stronger (weaker) than the Atlantic action center. The eddy momentum transports associated with the MJO in the Pacific sector are closely related to the retraction and extension of tropical Pacific easterlies and the subtropical Asian–Pacific jet. Because of its large scale, this regional effect is also reflected in the zonal mean state of wave transport and wave forcing on zonal wind, which in turn affects the phase of the AO.

Interdecadal change between the Arctic Oscillation and East Asian climate during 1900-2015 winters

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (14) ◽  
pp. 4791-4802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Liu ◽  
Shengping He ◽  
Fei Li ◽  
Huijun Wang ◽  
Yali Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Arctic Oscillation ◽  
East Asian ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Interdecadal Change ◽  
East Asian Climate ◽  
The Arctic Oscillation

scholarly journals Influence of the Madden–Julian Oscillation on the Arctic Oscillation Prediction in S2S Operational Models

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Zhou ◽  
Yang Wang
Keyword(s):  
Arctic Oscillation ◽  
Time Lag ◽  
Prediction Skill ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Negative Phase ◽  
Initial Time ◽  
Madden Julian Oscillation ◽  
Global Circulation Models ◽  
The Arctic Oscillation ◽  
The Relationship

The connections between the Madden–Julian Oscillation (MJO) and the Arctic Oscillation (AO) are examined in both observations and model forecasts. In the observations, the time-lag composites are carried out for AO indices and anomalies of 1,000-hPa geopotential height after an active or inactive initial MJO. The results show that when the AO is in its positive (negative) phase at the initial time, the AO activity is generally enhanced (weakened) after an active MJO. Reforecast data of the 11 operational global circulation models from the Sub-seasonal to Seasonal (S2S) Prediction Project are further used to examine the relationship between MJO activity and AO prediction. When the AO is in its positive phase on the initial day of the S2S prediction, an initial active MJO can generally improve the AO prediction skill in most of the models. This is consistent with results found in the observations that a leading MJO can enhance the AO activity. However, when the AO is in its negative phase, the relationship between the MJO and AO prediction is not consistent among the 11 models. Only a few S2S models provide results that agree with the observations. Furthermore, the S2S prediction skill of the AO is examined in different MJO phases. There is a significantly positive relationship between the MJO-related AO activity and the AO prediction skill. When the AO activity is strong (weak) in an MJO phase, including the inactive MJO, the models tend to have a high (low) AO prediction skill. For example, no matter what phase the initial AO is in, the AO prediction skill is generally high in MJO phase 7, in which the AO activity is generally strong. Thus, the MJO is an important predictability source for the AO forecast in the S2S models.

scholarly journals Boreal Winter Links between the Madden–Julian Oscillation and the Arctic Oscillation

2008 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 3040-3050 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle L. L’Heureux ◽  
R. Wayne Higgins
Keyword(s):  
Arctic Oscillation ◽  
Active Phase ◽  
Temperature Fields ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Boreal Winter ◽  
Madden Julian Oscillation ◽  
Global Circulation ◽  
Leading Mode ◽  
The Arctic Oscillation ◽  
The Tropics

Abstract There is increasing evidence that the Madden–Julian oscillation (MJO) modifies the mid- to high-latitude circulation and, in particular, appears to have a relationship to the leading mode of extratropical variability, the Arctic Oscillation (AO). In this study, new insights into the observed similarities between the MJO and the AO are explored. It is shown that the eastward progression of the convectively active phase of the MJO is associated with a corresponding shift in the tendency and sign of the AO index. Moreover, the AO and the MJO share several analogous features not only in the global circulation, but also in surface temperature fields. Also, the AO is linked to a pattern of eastward-propagating MJO-like variability in the tropics that is partially reproduced in free runs of the NCEP Climate Forecast System (CFS) model. Finally, it is shown that the structure of the AO, as defined by the leading mode in the 1000-hPa geopotential height field, is significantly altered based on the phase of the MJO.

scholarly journals Modulation of the Westerly and Easterly Quasi-Biennial Oscillation Phases on the Connection between the Madden–Julian Oscillation and the Arctic Oscillation

Atmosphere ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Song ◽  
Renguang Wu
Keyword(s):  
Rossby Wave ◽  
Arctic Oscillation ◽  
Wave Train ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Madden Julian Oscillation ◽  
Quasi Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Rossby Wave Train ◽  
Asian Pacific ◽  
The Arctic Oscillation ◽  
Biennial Oscillation

Previous studies have revealed the relationship between the Madden–Julian oscillation (MJO) and the Arctic Oscillation (AO). The MJO phase 2/3 is followed by the positive AO phase, and the MJO phase 6/7 is followed by the negative AO phase. This study reveals that the MJO phase 6/7–AO connection is modulated by the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO) through both tropospheric and stratospheric pathways during boreal winter. The MJO 2/3 phase and AO relationship is favored in both QBO easterly (QBOE) and westerly (QBOW) years because of the MJO-triggered tropospheric Rossby wave train from the tropics toward the polar region. The AO following the MJO 6/7 phase shifts to negative in QBOW years, but the MJO–AO connection diminishes in QBOE years. In QBOW years, the Asian-Pacific jet is enhanced, leading to more evident poleward propagation of tropospheric Rossby wave train, which contributes to the tropospheric pathway of the AO–MJO 6/7 connection. Besides, the enhanced Asian-Pacific jet in QBOW years is favorable for vertical propagation of planetary waves into the stratosphere in MJO phase 6/7, leading to negative AO, which indicates the stratospheric pathway of the AO–MJO 6/7 connection.

scholarly journals Relationship between Ural–Siberian Blocking and the East Asian Winter Monsoon in Relation to the Arctic Oscillation and the El Niño–Southern Oscillation

2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 4242-4257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ho Nam Cheung ◽  
Wen Zhou ◽  
Hing Yim Mok ◽  
Man Chi Wu
Keyword(s):  
Arctic Oscillation ◽  
East Asian Winter Monsoon ◽  
Southern Oscillation ◽  
Wave Train ◽  
East Asian ◽  
Winter Monsoon ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Asian Winter Monsoon ◽  
Blocking Activity ◽  
The Arctic Oscillation

Abstract This study attempts to assess the possible linkage between Ural–Siberian blocking and the East Asian winter monsoon (EAWM). During the boreal winter, the dominance of blocking thermally enhances cold advection downstream. The frequent occurrence of Ural–Siberian blocking potentially promotes a cold EAWM and vice versa. The seasonal blocking activity can be regarded as the combined effect of the Arctic Oscillation (AO) and the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Weakened (strengthened) meridional flow in the positive (negative) phase of the AO is unfavorable (favorable) for the formation of blocking highs. Because the AO shows a close relationship with the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), its teleconnection with Ural–Siberian blocking may exist in the form of an eastward-propagating wave train. Be that as it may, the wave train signal across East Asia may be disturbed by the external effect of a strong ENSO event, which probably enhances (weakens) the westerlies near Siberia in its warm (cold) phase. Consequently, the blocking–EAWM relationship is stronger (weaker) when the AO and ENSO are in phase (out of phase). If both AO and ENSO attain the positive (negative) phase, the Siberian high tends to be weaker (stronger) and the temperature tends to be higher (lower) in East Asia, with less (more) Ural–Siberian blocking. On the other hand, if they are out of phase, they are not strongly linked to the intensity of the Siberian high, and the blocking activity over Ural–Siberia is unclear.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document