Interdecadal change between the Arctic Oscillation and East Asian climate during 1900-2015 winters

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (14) ◽  
pp. 4791-4802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Liu ◽  
Shengping He ◽  
Fei Li ◽  
Huijun Wang ◽  
Yali Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Arctic Oscillation ◽  
East Asian ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Interdecadal Change ◽  
East Asian Climate ◽  
The Arctic Oscillation

scholarly journals Frequency Associations between East Asian Jet Streams and the Temperature over the Barents–Kara Sea Region/Arctic Oscillation in Winter

Climate ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 107
Author(s):  
Yuefeng Li ◽  
Yuxiang Zhu ◽  
Wei Song
Keyword(s):  
East Asia ◽  
Arctic Oscillation ◽  
East Asian ◽  
Kara Sea ◽  
Wavelet Coherence ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Jet Stream ◽  
Jet Streams ◽  
The Arctic Oscillation ◽  
Cross Wavelet

The frequency associations between jet streams over East Asia and the Arctic key temperature at 2 m (AKT2m) in the Barents–Kara Sea region (40°–75° E, 66°–82° N) and the Arctic Oscillation in winter are investigated using continuous wavelet transform, cross-wavelet transform, and wavelet coherence. The cross-wavelet transforms between the AKT2m/Arctic Oscillation and the East Asian polar front jet stream (EAPJ) suggest that the EAPJ is closely related to the AKT2m and Arctic Oscillation on an interannual (3–5-year band) timescale, but the variation in the phase angle denotes a complex frequency connection between the EAPJ and Arctic Oscillation. The squared wavelet coherence suggests that weakening of the EAPJ is associated with the rise in AKT2m during the period of abrupt climate change in East Asia. The EAPJ contains more forced components from the Arctic than the East Asian subtropical jet stream. By comparison, the relationship between AKT2m and the EAPJ is closer than that between the Arctic Oscillation and EAPJ, especially during the period of abrupt climate change in East Asia. This suggests that the EAPJ serves as a bridge for Arctic warming to affect the weather and climate over East Asia in winter. By contrast, the Arctic Oscillation does not play an important part, although it also contains information about the Arctic.

scholarly journals Relationship between Ural–Siberian Blocking and the East Asian Winter Monsoon in Relation to the Arctic Oscillation and the El Niño–Southern Oscillation

2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 4242-4257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ho Nam Cheung ◽  
Wen Zhou ◽  
Hing Yim Mok ◽  
Man Chi Wu
Keyword(s):  
Arctic Oscillation ◽  
East Asian Winter Monsoon ◽  
Southern Oscillation ◽  
Wave Train ◽  
East Asian ◽  
Winter Monsoon ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Asian Winter Monsoon ◽  
Blocking Activity ◽  
The Arctic Oscillation

Abstract This study attempts to assess the possible linkage between Ural–Siberian blocking and the East Asian winter monsoon (EAWM). During the boreal winter, the dominance of blocking thermally enhances cold advection downstream. The frequent occurrence of Ural–Siberian blocking potentially promotes a cold EAWM and vice versa. The seasonal blocking activity can be regarded as the combined effect of the Arctic Oscillation (AO) and the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Weakened (strengthened) meridional flow in the positive (negative) phase of the AO is unfavorable (favorable) for the formation of blocking highs. Because the AO shows a close relationship with the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), its teleconnection with Ural–Siberian blocking may exist in the form of an eastward-propagating wave train. Be that as it may, the wave train signal across East Asia may be disturbed by the external effect of a strong ENSO event, which probably enhances (weakens) the westerlies near Siberia in its warm (cold) phase. Consequently, the blocking–EAWM relationship is stronger (weaker) when the AO and ENSO are in phase (out of phase). If both AO and ENSO attain the positive (negative) phase, the Siberian high tends to be weaker (stronger) and the temperature tends to be higher (lower) in East Asia, with less (more) Ural–Siberian blocking. On the other hand, if they are out of phase, they are not strongly linked to the intensity of the Siberian high, and the blocking activity over Ural–Siberia is unclear.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document