scholarly journals Convectively Generated Gravity Waves in High Resolution Models of Tropical Dynamics

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 2564-2588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian K. Müller ◽  
Elisa Manzini ◽  
Marco Giorgetta ◽  
Kaoru Sato ◽  
Tomoe Nasuno
2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (17) ◽  
pp. 6383-6405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marvin A. Geller ◽  
M. Joan Alexander ◽  
Peter T. Love ◽  
Julio Bacmeister ◽  
Manfred Ern ◽  
...  

Abstract For the first time, a formal comparison is made between gravity wave momentum fluxes in models and those derived from observations. Although gravity waves occur over a wide range of spatial and temporal scales, the focus of this paper is on scales that are being parameterized in present climate models, sub-1000-km scales. Only observational methods that permit derivation of gravity wave momentum fluxes over large geographical areas are discussed, and these are from satellite temperature measurements, constant-density long-duration balloons, and high-vertical-resolution radiosonde data. The models discussed include two high-resolution models in which gravity waves are explicitly modeled, Kanto and the Community Atmosphere Model, version 5 (CAM5), and three climate models containing gravity wave parameterizations, MAECHAM5, Hadley Centre Global Environmental Model 3 (HadGEM3), and the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) model. Measurements generally show similar flux magnitudes as in models, except that the fluxes derived from satellite measurements fall off more rapidly with height. This is likely due to limitations on the observable range of wavelengths, although other factors may contribute. When one accounts for this more rapid fall off, the geographical distribution of the fluxes from observations and models compare reasonably well, except for certain features that depend on the specification of the nonorographic gravity wave source functions in the climate models. For instance, both the observed fluxes and those in the high-resolution models are very small at summer high latitudes, but this is not the case for some of the climate models. This comparison between gravity wave fluxes from climate models, high-resolution models, and fluxes derived from observations indicates that such efforts offer a promising path toward improving specifications of gravity wave sources in climate models.


2018 ◽  
Vol 99 (5) ◽  
pp. 1027-1040 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. R. Jackson ◽  
A. Gadian ◽  
N. P. Hindley ◽  
L. Hoffmann ◽  
J. Hughes ◽  
...  

AbstractGravity waves (GWs) play an important role in many atmospheric processes. However, the observation-based understanding of GWs is limited, and representing them in numerical models is difficult. Recent studies show that small islands can be intense sources of GWs, with climatologically significant effects on the atmospheric circulation. South Georgia, in the South Atlantic, is a notable source of such “small island” waves. GWs are usually too small scale to be resolved by current models, so their effects are represented approximately using resolved model fields (parameterization). However, the small-island waves are not well represented by such parameterizations, and the explicit representation of GWs in very-high-resolution models is still in its infancy. Steep islands such as South Georgia are also known to generate low-level wakes, affecting the flow hundreds of kilometers downwind. These wakes are also poorly represented in models.We present results from the South Georgia Wave Experiment (SG-WEX) for 5 July 2015. Analysis of GWs from satellite observations is augmented by radiosonde observations made from South Georgia. Simulations were also made using high-resolution configurations of the Met Office Unified Model (UM). Comparison with observations indicates that the UM performs well for this case, with realistic representation of GW patterns and low-level wakes. Examination of a longer simulation period suggests that the wakes generally are well represented by the model. The realism of these simulations suggests they can be used to develop parameterizations for use at coarser model resolutions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregor Luetzenburg ◽  
Aart Kroon ◽  
Anders A. Bjørk

AbstractTraditionally, topographic surveying in earth sciences requires high financial investments, elaborate logistics, complicated training of staff and extensive data processing. Recently, off-the-shelf drones with optical sensors already reduced the costs for obtaining a high-resolution dataset of an Earth surface considerably. Nevertheless, costs and complexity associated with topographic surveying are still high. In 2020, Apple Inc. released the iPad Pro 2020 and the iPhone 12 Pro with novel build-in LiDAR sensors. Here we investigate the basic technical capabilities of the LiDAR sensors and we test the application at a coastal cliff in Denmark. The results are compared to state-of-the-art Structure from Motion Multi-View Stereo (SfM MVS) point clouds. The LiDAR sensors create accurate high-resolution models of small objects with a side length > 10 cm with an absolute accuracy of ± 1 cm. 3D models with the dimensions of up to 130 × 15 × 10 m of a coastal cliff with an absolute accuracy of ± 10 cm are compiled. Overall, the versatility in handling outweighs the range limitations, making the Apple LiDAR devices cost-effective alternatives to established techniques in remote sensing with possible fields of application for a wide range of geo-scientific areas and teaching.


2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 545-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Céline Scheidt ◽  
Jef Caers ◽  
Yuguang Chen ◽  
Louis J. Durlofsky

1997 ◽  
Vol 341 ◽  
pp. 1-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
WILLIAM J. MERRYFIELD ◽  
GREG HOLLOWAY

The physical basis for parameterizing topographic stress due to unresolved eddies is examined in a quasi-geostrophic barotropic model. Topographic stress parameterization is shown to represent two effects of eddies: attraction of the flow to a statistical equilibrium featuring topographically correlated mean currents, and dissipation of potential enstrophy. Performance is evaluated by comparing parameterized low-resolution models with explicit high-resolution models.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document