scholarly journals Why do some lightning return stroke models not reproduce the far-field zero crossing?

2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (D16) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Shoory ◽  
F. Rachidi ◽  
M. Rubinstein ◽  
R. Moini ◽  
S. H. H. Sadeghi
Atmosphere ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 249
Author(s):  
Vernon Cooray ◽  
Marcos Rubinstein ◽  
Farhad Rachidi

In return strokes, the parameters that can be measured are the channel base current and the return stroke speed. For this reason, many return stroke models have been developed with these two parameters, among others, as inputs. Here, we concentrate on the current propagation type engineering return stroke models where the return stroke is represented by a current pulse propagating upwards along the leader channel. In the current propagation type return stroke models, in addition to the channel base current and the return stroke speed, the way in which the return stroke current attenuates along the return stroke channel is specified as an input parameter. The goal of this paper is to show that, within the confines of current propagation type models, once the channel base current and the return stroke speed are known, the measured radiation field can be used to evaluate how the return stroke current attenuates along the channel. After giving the mathematics necessary for this inverse transformation, the procedure is illustrated by extracting the current attenuation curve from the typical wave shape of the return stroke current and from the distant radiation field of subsequent return strokes. The derived attenuation curve is used to evaluate both the subsequent and first return stroke electromagnetic fields at different distances. It is shown that all the experimentally observed features can be reproduced by the derived attenuation curve, except for the subsidiary peak and long zero-crossing times. In order to obtain electromagnetic fields of subsequent return strokes that are in agreement with measurements, one has to incorporate the current dispersion into the model. In the case of first return strokes, both current dispersion and reduction in return stroke speed with height are needed to obtain the desired features.


Author(s):  
Ahmad Idil Abd Rahman ◽  
◽  
Muhammad Akmal Bahari ◽  
Zikri Abadi Baharudin ◽  
◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Muhammad Akmal Bahari ◽  
Zikri Abadi Baharudin ◽  
Tole Sutikno ◽  
Ahmad Idil Abdul Rahman ◽  
Mohd Ariff Mat Hanafiah ◽  
...  

The mechanism on how lightning detection system (LDS) operated never been exposed by manufacturer since it was confidential. This scenario motivated the authors to explore the issue above by using MATLAB to develop autoanalysis software based on the feature extraction. This extraction is intended for recognizing the parameters in the first return stroke, and compare the measurement between the autoanalysis software and the manual analysis. This paper is a modification based on a previous work regarding autoanalysis of zero-crossing time and initial peak of return stroke using features extraction programming technique. Further, the parameter on rising time of initial peak is added in this autoanalysis programming technique. Finally, the manual analysis using WaveStudio (LeCroy product) of those two lightning parameters is compared with autoanalysis software. This study found that the autoanalysis produce similar result with the manual analysis, hence proved the reliability of this software.


1993 ◽  
Vol 98 (D12) ◽  
pp. 22903 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajeev Thottappillil ◽  
Martin A. Uman
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document