scholarly journals First results of the TRMM Microwave Imager (TMI) monthly oceanic rain rate: comparison with SSM/I

1999 ◽  
Vol 26 (15) ◽  
pp. 2379-2382 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. T. C. Chang ◽  
L. S. Chiu ◽  
C. Kummerow ◽  
J. Meng ◽  
T. T. Wilheit
Keyword(s):  
Rain Rate ◽  
First Results ◽  
Microwave Imager ◽  
Trmm Microwave Imager ◽  
Rate Comparison

scholarly journals Hurricane GPROF: An Optimized Ocean Microwave Rainfall Retrieval for Tropical Cyclones

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 1539-1556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula J. Brown ◽  
Christian D. Kummerow ◽  
David L. Randel
Keyword(s):  
Tropical Cyclones ◽  
Vertical Profile ◽  
Rain Rate ◽  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Initial Assessment ◽  
Trmm Precipitation ◽  
Microwave Imager ◽  
One Year ◽  
Trmm Microwave Imager ◽  
Rain Rates

AbstractThe Goddard profiling algorithm (GPROF) is an operational passive microwave retrieval that uses a Bayesian scheme to estimate rainfall. GPROF 2014 retrieves rainfall and hydrometeor vertical profile information based upon a database of profiles constructed to be simultaneously consistent with Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) precipitation radar (PR) and TRMM Microwave Imager (TMI) observations. A small number of tropical cyclones are in the current database constructed from one year of TRMM data, resulting in the retrieval performing relatively poorly for these systems, particularly for the highest rain rates. To address this deficiency, a new database focusing specifically on hurricanes but consisting of 9 years of TRMM data is created. The new database and retrieval procedure for TMI and GMI is called Hurricane GPROF. An initial assessment of seven tropical cyclones shows that Hurricane GPROF provides a better estimate of hurricane rain rates than GPROF 2014. Hurricane GPROF rain-rate errors relative to the PR are reduced by 20% compared to GPROF, with improvements in the lowest and highest rain rates especially. Vertical profile retrievals for four hydrometeors are also enhanced, as error is reduced by 30% compared to the GPROF retrieval, relative to PR estimates. When compared to the full database of tropical cyclones, Hurricane GPROF improves the RMSE and MAE of rain-rate estimates over those from GPROF by about 22% and 27%, respectively. Similar improvements are also seen in the overall rain-rate bias for hurricanes in the database, which is reduced from 0.20 to −0.06 mm h−1.

Rain Retrieval from TMI Brightness Temperature Measurements Using a TRMM PR–Based Database

2006 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 455-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Viltard ◽  
Corinne Burlaud ◽  
Christian D. Kummerow
Keyword(s):  
Brightness Temperature ◽  
Rain Rate ◽  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
High Standard ◽  
Brightness Temperatures ◽  
Trmm Pr ◽  
Microwave Imager ◽  
Point To Point ◽  
Trmm Microwave Imager ◽  
Test Database

Abstract This study focuses on improving the retrieval of rain from measured microwave brightness temperatures and the capability of the retrieved field to represent the mesoscale structure of a small intense hurricane. For this study, a database is constructed from collocated Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) precipitation radar (PR) and the TRMM Microwave Imager (TMI) data resulting in about 50 000 brightness temperature vectors associated with their corresponding rain-rate profiles. The database is then divided in two: a retrieval database of about 35 000 rain profiles and a test database of about 25 000 rain profiles. Although in principle this approach is used to build a database over both land and ocean, the results presented here are only given for ocean surfaces, for which the conditions for the retrieval are optimal. An algorithm is built using the retrieval database. This algorithm is then used on the test database, and results show that the error can be constrained to reasonable levels for most of the observed rain ranges. The relative error is nonetheless sensitive to the rain rate, with maximum errors at the low and high ends of the rain intensities (+60% and −30%, respectively) and a minimum error between 1 and 7 mm h−1. The retrieval method is optimized to exhibit a low total bias for climatological purposes and thus shows a high standard deviation on point-to-point comparisons. The algorithm is applied to the case of Hurricane Bret (1999). The retrieved rain field is analyzed in terms of structure and intensity and is then compared with the TRMM PR original rain field. The results show that the mesoscale structures are indeed well reproduced even if the retrieved rain misses the highest peaks of precipitation. Nevertheless, the mesoscale asymmetries are well reproduced and the maximum rain is found in the correct quadrant. Once again, the total bias is low, which allows for future calculation of the heat sources/sinks associated with precipitation production and evaporation.

scholarly journals Comparisons of Instantaneous TRMM Ground Validation and Satellite Rain-Rate Estimates at Different Spatial Scales

2008 ◽  
Vol 47 (8) ◽  
pp. 2215-2237 ◽  
Author(s):  
David B. Wolff ◽  
Brad L. Fisher
Keyword(s):  
Rain Rate ◽  
Spatial Scales ◽  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Heavy Rain ◽  
Global Ocean ◽  
Ground Validation ◽  
Microwave Imager ◽  
Rain Events ◽  
Trmm Microwave Imager ◽  
Rain Rates

Abstract This study provides a comprehensive intercomparison of instantaneous rain rates observed by the two rain sensors aboard the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) satellite with ground data from two regional sites established for long-term ground validation: Kwajalein Atoll and Melbourne, Florida. The satellite rain algorithms utilize remote observations of precipitation collected by the TRMM Microwave Imager (TMI) and the Precipitation Radar (PR) aboard the TRMM satellite. Three standard level II rain products are generated from operational applications of the TMI, PR, and combined (COM) rain algorithms using rain information collected from the TMI and the PR along the orbital track of the TRMM satellite. In the first part of the study, 0.5° × 0.5° instantaneous rain rates obtained from the TRMM 3G68 product were analyzed and compared to instantaneous Ground Validation (GV) program rain rates gridded at a scale of 0.5° × 0.5°. In the second part of the study, TMI, PR, COM, and GV rain rates were spatiotemporally matched and averaged at the scale of the TMI footprint (∼150 km2). This study covered a 6-yr period (1999–2004) and consisted of over 50 000 footprints for each GV site. In the first analysis, the results showed that all of the respective rain-rate estimates agree well, with some exceptions. The more salient differences were associated with heavy rain events in which one or more of the algorithms failed to properly retrieve these extreme events. Also, it appears that there is a preferred mode of precipitation for TMI rain rates at or near 2 mm h−1 over the ocean. This mode was noted over ocean areas of Kwajalein and Melbourne and has been observed in TRMM tropical–global ocean areas as well.

Comparison of TRMM-Derived Rainfall Products for General and Extreme Rains over the Maritime Continent

2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (7) ◽  
pp. 1867-1881 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andung Bayu Sekaranom ◽  
Hirohiko Masunaga
Keyword(s):  
Rain Rate ◽  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Maritime Continent ◽  
Brightness Temperatures ◽  
Extreme Rain ◽  
Trmm Precipitation ◽  
Precipitation Analysis ◽  
Microwave Imager ◽  
Trmm Microwave Imager ◽  
Rain Rates

AbstractProperties of the rain estimation differences between Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Precipitation Radar (PR) 2A25, TRMM Microwave Imager (TMI) 2A12, and TRMM Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) 3B42 are investigated with a focus on distinguishing between nonextreme and extreme rains over the Maritime Continent from 1998 to 2014. Statistical analyses of collocated TMI 1B11 85-GHz polarization-corrected brightness temperatures, PR 2A23 storm-top heights, and PR 2A25 vertical rain profiles are conducted to identify possible sources of the differences. The results indicate that a large estimation difference exists between PR and TMI for the general rain rate (extreme and nonextreme events). The PR–TMI rain-rate differences are larger over land and coast than over ocean. When extreme rain is isolated, a higher frequency of occurrence is identified by PR over ocean, followed by TMI and TMPA. Over land, TMI yields higher rain frequencies than PR with an intermediate range of rain rates (between 15 and 25 mm h−1), but it gives way to PR for the highest extremes. The turnover at the highest rain rates arises because the heaviest rain depicted by PR does not necessarily accompany the strongest ice-scattering signals, which TMI relies on for estimating precipitation over land and coast.

scholarly journals Regional Differences in Overland Rainfall Estimation from PR-Calibrated TMI Algorithm

2005 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tufa Dinku ◽  
Emmanouil N. Anagnostou
Keyword(s):  
Regional Differences ◽  
Rain Rate ◽  
Central Africa ◽  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Error Statistics ◽  
Southern Plains ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Current Algorithm ◽  
Microwave Imager ◽  
Trmm Microwave Imager

Abstract The Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) satellite carries a combination of active [precipitation radar (PR)] and multichannel passive microwave [the TRMM Microwave Imager (TMI)] sensors, which advance our ability to estimate rainfall over land. Rain retrieval from the TRMM PR is associated with an unprecedented accuracy and resolution but is limited in terms of sampling because of the narrow PR swath width (215 km). TMI provides wider coverage (760 km), but its observations are associated with a more complex relationship to precipitation in comparison with PR (especially over land). The PR rain estimates are used here for calibrating an overland TMI rain algorithm. The algorithm consists of 1) multichannel-based rain screening and convective/stratiform (C/S) classification schemes, and 2) nonlinear (linear) regressions for the rain-rate retrieval of stratiform (convective) rain regimes. This study examines regional differences in the algorithm performance. Four geographic regions consisting of central Africa (AFC), the Amazon (AMZ), the U.S. southern Plains (USA), and the Ganges–Brahmaputra–Meghna River basin (GBM) in south Asia are selected. Data from three summer months of 2000 and 2001 are used for calibration; validation is done using summer 2002 data. The current algorithm is also compared with the latest [version 6 (V6)] TRMM 2A12 product in terms of rain detection, and rain-rate retrieval error statistics on the basis of PR reference rainfall. The performance of the algorithm is different for the different regions. For instance, the reduction in random error (relative to 2A12 V6) is about 24%, 36%, 57%, and 165% for USA, AFC, AMZ, and GBM, respectively. However, significant difference between global (the four regions combined) and regional calibration is observed only for the GBM region.

scholarly journals Long-Term Comparison of Collocated Instantaneous Rain Retrievals from the TRMM Microwave Imager and Precipitation Radar over the Ocean

2015 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 867-879 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun-Kyoung Seo ◽  
Svetla Hristova-Veleva ◽  
Guosheng Liu ◽  
Mi-Lim Ou ◽  
Geun-Hyeok Ryu
Keyword(s):  
Remote Sensing ◽  
Rain Rate ◽  
Precipitation Radar ◽  
Climate Record ◽  
Convective Rain ◽  
Microwave Imager ◽  
Trmm Microwave Imager ◽  
Rain Rates ◽  
Geographical Locations

AbstractVersion-7 (V7) rain rates retrieved by the TRMM Microwave Imager (TMI) and Precipitation Radar (PR) are spatially and temporally collocated over the ocean and compared at TMI footprint scale for the summer months of 16 years, within the TRMM coverage belt from 38°S to 38°N latitude. This study puts special emphasis on examining how the estimates from the two instruments compare with each other for different rain types and for different geographical locations. It is found that, although the two rain-rate estimates agree with each other extremely well (only 2.6% difference) when averaged globally and over all rain types, large discrepancies (~60%) are observed if comparisons are conducted for rain pixels of only convective type or for regions where convective rain types dominate. For the stratiform rain type, the TMI and PR retrievals compare well with a difference of ~13% globally. In particular, the partial beam filling seems to be less important to the underestimation of TMI rain against PR rain than the spatial variability of rain. These findings point to the existing need for better understanding of the remote-sensing physics of convective rain. Such an improved understanding is critically important to decreasing the uncertainty in oceanic rainfall estimation from space in the coming GPM era of global long-term observations that will lead to the creation of a climate record of trends in precipitation.

scholarly journals Rain-Rate Characteristics over the Korean Peninsula and Improvement of the Goddard Profiling (GPROF) Database for TMI Rainfall Retrievals

2012 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 786-798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geun-Hyeok Ryu ◽  
Byung-Ju Sohn ◽  
Christian D. Kummerow ◽  
Eun-Kyoung Seo ◽  
Gregory J. Tripoli
Keyword(s):  
Korean Peninsula ◽  
Rain Rate ◽  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Summer Rainfall ◽  
Retrieval Algorithm ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Brightness Temperatures ◽  
University Of Wisconsin ◽  
Microwave Imager ◽  
Trmm Microwave Imager

AbstractSummer rainfall characteristics over the Korean Peninsula are examined using six years of Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Microwave Imager (TMI) measurements and surface rain measurements from the densely populated rain gauges spread across South Korea. A comparison of the TMI brightness temperature at 85 GHz with the measured surface rain rate reveals that a significant portion of rainfall over the peninsula occurs at warmer brightness temperatures than would be expected from the Goddard profiling (GPROF) database. By incorporating the locally observed rain characteristics into the GPROF algorithm, efforts are made to test whether locally appropriate hydrometeor profiles may be used to improve the retrieved rainfall. Profiles are obtained by simulating rain cases using the cloud-resolving University of Wisconsin Nonhydrostatic Modeling System (UW-NMS) model and matching the calculated radar reflectivities to TRMM precipitation radar (PR) reflectivities. Selected profiles and the corresponding simulated TMI brightness temperatures (limited in this study to values that are larger than 235 K) are added to the GPROF database to form a modified database that is considered to be more suitable for local application over the Korean Peninsula. The rainfall retrieved from the new database demonstrates that heavy-rainfall events—in particular, those associated with warmer clouds—are better captured by the new algorithm as compared with the official TRMM GPROF version-6 retrievals. The results suggest that a more locally suitable rain retrieval algorithm can be developed if locally representative rain characteristics are included in the GPROF algorithm.

scholarly journals A Method to Estimate Rain Rate over Tropical Oceans with the TRMM Microwave Imager Radiometer

2008 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 203-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
C PRABHAKARA ◽  
R IACOVAZZI, Jr. ◽  
J.-M YOO ◽  
K.-M KIM ◽  
T. L BELL
Keyword(s):  
Rain Rate ◽  
Tropical Oceans ◽  
Microwave Imager ◽  
Trmm Microwave Imager
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document