scholarly journals Nuclear Inclusion of Nontargeted and Chromatin-Targeted Polystyrene Beads and Plasmid DNA Containing Nanoparticles

2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 1757-1766 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathalie Symens ◽  
Rudolf Walczak ◽  
Joseph Demeester ◽  
Iain Mattaj ◽  
Stefaan C. De Smedt ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (23-24) ◽  
pp. 1082-1083
Author(s):  
N. Symens ◽  
R. Walzack ◽  
J. Demeester ◽  
I. Mattaj ◽  
S. De Smedt ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 148 (1) ◽  
pp. e96-e98 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Symens ◽  
R. Walzack ◽  
J. Demeester ◽  
I. Mattaj ◽  
S.C. De Smedt ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
F. G. Zaki ◽  
J. A. Greenlee ◽  
C. H. Keysser

Nuclear inclusion bodies seen in human liver cells may appear in light microscopy as deposits of fat or glycogen resulting from various diseases such as diabetes, hepatitis, cholestasis or glycogen storage disease. These deposits have been also encountered in experimental liver injury and in our animals subjected to nutritional deficiencies, drug intoxication and hepatocarcinogens. Sometimes these deposits fail to demonstrate the presence of fat or glycogen and show PAS negative reaction. Such deposits are considered as viral products.Electron microscopic studies of these nuclei revealed that such inclusion bodies were not products of the nucleus per se but were mere segments of endoplasmic reticulum trapped inside invaginating nuclei (Fig. 1-3).


Author(s):  
Malcolm Brown ◽  
Reynolds M. Delgado ◽  
Michael J. Fink

While light microscopy has been used to image sub-micron objects, numerous problems with diffraction-limitations often preclude extraction of useful information. Using conventional dark-field and phase contrast light microscopy coupled with image processing, we have studied the following objects: (a) polystyrene beads (88nm, 264nm, and 557mn); (b) frustules of the diatom, Pleurosigma angulatum, and the T-4 bacteriophage attached to its host, E. coli or free in the medium. Equivalent images of the same areas of polystyrene beads and T-4 bacteriophages were produced using transmission electron microscopy.For light microscopy, we used a Zeiss universal microscope. For phase contrast observations a 100X Neofluar objective (N.A.=1.3) was applied. With dark-field, a 100X planachromat objective (N.A.=1.25) in combination with an ultra-condenser (N.A.=1.25) was employed. An intermediate magnifier (Optivar) was available to conveniently give magnification settings of 1.25, 1.6, and 2.0. The image was projected onto the back focal plane of a film or television camera with a Carl Zeiss Jena 18X Compens ocular.


2019 ◽  
Vol XIV (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
I.Y. Bozo ◽  
A.A. Titova ◽  
M.N. Zhuravleva ◽  
A.I. Bilyalov ◽  
M.O. Mavlikeev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

1998 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 451-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susumu TAKAMATSU ◽  
Manami NAKANO ◽  
Hideyuki YOKOTA ◽  
Hitoshi KUNOH

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document