Comparison of theoretical methods for the determination of the protonation and deprotonation energies of ammonia, water, hydrogen fluoride, phosphine, hydrogen sulfide, hydrogen chloride and hydrogen cyanide

1990 ◽  
Vol 94 (14) ◽  
pp. 5514-5518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet E. Del Bene ◽  
Isaiah. Shavitt
1978 ◽  
Vol 56 (22) ◽  
pp. 2884-2888 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Queen ◽  
Alberta E. Lemire ◽  
Alexander F. Janzen ◽  
Michael N. Paddon-Row

Dimethyl sulfoxide reacts with phenyl chlorothiolformate according to the stoichiometry:[Formula: see text]p-Chlorophenyl and tert-butyl chlorothiolformate appeared to react in a similar manner. The 1:1 hydrogen chloride adduct Me2SO:HCl was characterized by elemental analysis and proton and carbon nmr. A cryoscopic molecular weight determination of the adduct Me2SO:HOCH(CF3)2 showed it to be monomeric at low concentrations but associated at higher concentrations, suggesting a monomer–dimer equilibrium. The 1:2 adduct Me2SO:2HF is formed by the addition of anhydrous HF to dimethyl sulfoxide.


1997 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 609-619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vlastimil Kubáň

Ammonia (up to 0.3 vol.%) can be determined (RSDs < 2%) after separation from a process gas stream containing (vol.%): carbon dioxide (0.3-20), hydrogen sulfide (< 0.4), hydrogen cyanide (< 1.5 . 10-4), sulfur dioxide (1), carbon monoxide (< 3) in 50-90 vol.% nitrogen and hydrocarbons. The ammonia content in sample is determined through changes in the conductivity of an acceptor stream (3 mM boric acid) caused by absorption of the analyte passed through a Nafion capillary membrane.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document