Homonuclear phosphorus-31 J-resolved 2D spectra of rhodium(I) phosphine complexes in the solid state

1992 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Wu ◽  
Roderick E. Wasylishen
2009 ◽  
Vol 87 (7) ◽  
pp. 1090-1101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fu Chen ◽  
Se-Woung Oh ◽  
Roderick E. Wasylishen

High-resolution solid-state 31P NMR spectroscopy was used to investigate a series of 1:1 silver–triphenylphosphine complexes, [Ph3PAgX]n, where X is a monovalent anion and n = 1, 2, 3, 4, or ∞. The 31P CP MAS NMR spectra reveal the number of distinct phosphorus sites in these complexes as well as the |1J(109Ag,31P)| values, which range from 401 ± 10 Hz (X = N3–) to 869 ± 10 Hz (X = SO3CF3–). The data obtained here and in earlier investigations indicate that |1J(109Ag,31P)| values for silver–tertiary phosphine complexes decrease as Ag–P bond lengths increase. This experimental conclusion is supported by DFT calculations, which also indicate that the Fermi-contact mechanism is the only important spin–spin coupling mechanism for 1J(109Ag,31P) in these complexes. In addition, the crystal structure of a silver–triphenylphosphine trifluoroacetate tetramer was determined using X-ray crystallography, and the structure of a silver–triphenylphosphine chloride tetramer was reinvestigated.


2015 ◽  
Vol 119 (30) ◽  
pp. 8279-8293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huaguang Yu ◽  
Xiuzhen Tan ◽  
Guy M. Bernard ◽  
Victor V. Terskikh ◽  
Jinglin Chen ◽  
...  

1984 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 621-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Allman ◽  
Ram G. Goel

Cationic complexes of the type [Hg(phosphine)n](ClO4)2 (n = 2, 3, 4) (phosphine = P(t-Bu)3, PCy3, P(4-Me2NC6H4)3, P(4-MeOC6H4)3, P(4-MeC6H4)3, P(3-MeC6H4)3, P(2-MeC6H4)3, P(4-FC6H4)3, P(4-ClC6H4)3) have been prepared and studied by vibrational spectroscopy in the perchlorate and low frequency regions, as well as by 31P and 199Hg nmr. The skeletal Hg—P frequencies have been assigned in both solution and the solid state. It was found that 1J(Hg—P) decreases with increasing phosphine basicity and that it is also dependent upon sample concentration and temperature.


1993 ◽  
Vol 48 (11) ◽  
pp. 1544-1554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerhard Müller ◽  
Joachim Lachmann

The organometal phosphine complexes ML3 (L = [o-(Ph2PCH2)C6H4]-; M = Al3+, Ga3+, In3a+) are obtained from MC13 and the lithiated ligand in diethyl ether. Tl[o-(Ph2PCH2)C6H4]3 is prepared from T1C1 by a disproportionation reaction. M1 species could not be detected with L as ligand. Al[o-(Ph2PCH2)C6H4]3 is the first triorganoaluminum bis(phosphine) adduct where C3P2 pentacoordination at aluminum has been definitely proven for both the solution (δ(27Al) =131 ppm, w1/2 = 12 kHz) and the solid state (d(Al–P) = 2.676(3)/2.782(2) A). The trigonal-bipyramidal coordination geometry (C3P2) at Al is achieved by two of the anionic phosphines acting as chelating ligands, spanning equatorial (C atoms) and axial sites (P atoms), while the third phosphine is only carbon-bonded. Like AlL3, the heavier congeners ML3 (M = Ga, In, Tl) are stereochemically nonrigid molecules in solution. Surprisingly, in the solid state only InL3 resembles the aluminum complex (C3P2 penta-coordination) while GaL3 and T1L3 contain four-coordinate metal centers (C3P). This may be rationalized by the noticeably less polar Ga–P bonds as compared to Al–P and In–P bonds, while in T1L3 the span of the ligand is not sufficient to allow for chelating coordination at a five- (or six-)coordinate Tl center.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document