Methods for Characterization of Composition of Fly Ashes from Coal-Fired Power Stations:  A Critical Overview

2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 1084-1098 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanislav V. Vassilev ◽  
Christina G. Vassileva
1994 ◽  
Vol 370 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Barrioulet ◽  
H. Cros ◽  
B. Husson ◽  
E. Ringot

AbstractFly ash from power stations is used as concrete additive to improve strength and durability. Surprisingly, studies of ashes of identical mineralogical composition from two different places have reported different results in terms of the rheological properties of the fresh material. The viscosity of the pastes made from these different fly ashes seems to be linked to the proportion of spherical and smooth-shaped grains found in them. A quantitative image analysis was carried out to characterize the shape of the grains of these two ashes from different geographical origins. The main result proves that the higher the glassy particle content of the fly ash, the more the hydraulic matrix is fluid.


2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 495-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jadambaa Temuujin ◽  
William Rickard ◽  
Arie van Riessen

1984 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. I. A. Malek ◽  
D. M. Roy

AbstractThe zeta-potentials of two fly ashes were studied (high-calcium and low-calcium). It was found that they possess a point of charge reversal at pH = 10.5 to 12. The point of zero charge (low-calcium fly ash) was found to be at pH = 5. Furthermore, it shifted to more acidic values after the fly ash is aged in several calcium-containing solutions. The surficial changes that could happen when mixing fly ashes with cement and concrete were further evaluated by aging fly ashes in different solutions: Ca(OH)2, CaSO4·2H2O, NaOH and water solutions. Information from analyses for different ionic species in the solutions and characterization of the solid residues (XRD and SEM) was used in tentative explanations for the different behavior of the two types of fly ash in cementitious mixtures and concrete.


2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Pereira Berto ◽  
Douglas McIntosh ◽  
Carlos Wilson Gomes Lopes

The oocysts of the coccidia are robust structures, frequently isolated from the feces or urine of their hosts, which provide resistance to mechanical damage and allow the parasites to survive and remain infective for prolonged periods. The diagnosis of coccidiosis, species description and systematics, are all dependent upon characterization of the oocyst. Therefore, this review aimed to the provide a critical overview of the methodologies, advantages and limitations of the currently available morphological, morphometrical and molecular biology based approaches that may be utilized for characterization of these important structures. It has become apparent that no single methodology is sufficient to fully characterize these structures and the majority of researchers favor the use of combinational or polyphasic approaches.


2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 745-755
Author(s):  
Le Van Thien ◽  
Ngo Thi Tuong Chau ◽  
Le Thi Tham Hong ◽  
Nguyen Thu Trang ◽  
Hiroyuki Futamata

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (14) ◽  
pp. 4951
Author(s):  
Helena Lopes ◽  
Susana Proença

Since ashes are a possible source of Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) contamination, their application in soils must be subject to more study and control. In this scope, feed residual forest biomasses and biomass ashes, collected along one year in four biomass power stations, were characterized mainly for their polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs) and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) contents. The biomasses present concerning levels of Cl (0.04–0.28%) that may lead to PCDD/Fs formation. The biomasses also contain OCDD (29–260 ng/kg) and 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD (35 ng/kg) that may contribute to increased Toxic Equivalents (TEQs) of ashes, possibly involving dechlorination and ash enrichment mechanisms. While the WHO2005-TEQs in bottom ashes (14–20 ng TEQ/kg) reaches the proposed limit (20 ng TEQ/kg) for ash use as fertilizers, in fly ashes (35–1139 ng TEQ/kg) the limit is exceeded. PAHs are below 0.02 mg/kg in bottom ashes and 1.5–2.5 mg/kg in fly ashes, complying with the proposed limit of 6 mg/kg. As bottom and fly ash streams may contain different ash flows, a clear definition of ash mixes is required. Correlations between unburned carbon (C), PAHs and PCDD/Fs were not found, which highlights the need for compulsory PCDD/Fs analysis in ashes, independently of their origin, burnout degree or levels of other contaminants. A sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of handling non-detected values, which showed more impact for TEQs values close to the proposed regulatory limit of PCDD/Fs. These findings highlight the need to define reporting protocols of analytical results for risk assessments and conformity evaluation.


2000 ◽  
Vol 07 (03) ◽  
pp. 277-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
GIANFRANCO PACCHIONI

The electronic structure and chemisorption properties of the surface of ionic crystals are reviewed, with emphasis on two topics: a critical overview of the experimental and theoretical studies of the adsorption of CO on single crystal and polycrystalline MgO, and a discussion on the most important defect centers at the MgO surface — low-coordinated sites, single oxygen and magnesium vacancies, divacancies, and impurity or substitutional atoms. The two subjects are to some extent interconnected. From the detailed theoretical and experimental study of the adsorption of a nonreactive molecule like CO and from the comparison of experiments done on single crystal or thin films and on powder samples, one can learn about the nature and concentration of the defects at the surface. A more precise characterization of defects requires, however, a careful spectroscopic investigation and a direct comparison with quantum-chemical calculations of both geometric structure and observable properties. The combined theoretical–experimental approach offers new opportunities for a better understanding of the complexity of oxide surfaces.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document