From One-Dimensional Ribbon to Three-Dimensional Microporous Framework: The Syntheses, Crystal Structures, and Properties of a Series of Mercury Antimony Chalcogenides

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 1364-1372 ◽  
Author(s):  
De-Nian Kong ◽  
Zai-Lai Xie ◽  
Mei-Ling Feng ◽  
Dong Ye ◽  
Ke-Zhao Du ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Crystal Structures ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Structures And Properties ◽  
Antimony Chalcogenides

scholarly journals Topological study of diverse hydrogen-bonded patterns found in a system of a nickel(II) complex and the sulfate anion

2018 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 351-359
Author(s):  
Miguel Angel Harvey ◽  
Sebastián Suarez ◽  
Pavel N. Zolotarev ◽  
Davide M. Proserpio ◽  
Ricardo Baggio
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Bonds ◽  
Crystal Structures ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Sulfate Anion ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Space Groups ◽  
Striking Resemblance ◽  
The Third ◽  
Reference Framework ◽  
Hydrogen Bonded

A nickel(II) coordination complex, bis[2,6-bis(1H-benzimidazol-2-yl-κN3)pyridine-κN]nickel(II) sulfate, [Ni(C19H13N5)2]SO4or [Ni(H2L)2]SO4, having four peripheral tetrahedrally oriented N—H donor units, combines with sulfate bridges to create hydrogen-bonded structures of varied dimensionality. The three crystal structures reported herein in the space groupsP212121,I\overline{4} andPccnare defined solely by strong charge-assisted N—H...O hydrogen bonds and contain disordered guests (water and dimethylformamide) that vary in size, shape and degree of hydrophilicity. Two of the compounds are channelled solids with three-dimensional structures, while the third is one-dimensional in nature. In spite of their differences, all three present a striking resemblance to the previously reported anhydrous relative [Guoet al.(2011).Chin. J. Inorg. Chem.27, 1517–1520], which is considered as the reference framework from which all three title compounds are derived. The hydrogen-bonded frameworks are described and compared using crystallographic and topological approaches.

Investigation of the crystal structures and Hirshfeld surfaces of three closely related N-(2-fluorobenzoyl)-arylsulfonamides

2016 ◽  
Vol 231 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Parameshwar Adimule Suchetan ◽  
Gundagallu Madanagopala Reddy Supriya ◽  
Kalavala Shivaprakash Srivishnu ◽  
Hanumanahalli Nagaraju Lakshmikantha ◽  
Shivalingegowda Naveen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Crystal Structures ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Hirshfeld Surface ◽  
Compound I ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Π Interactions ◽  
Hirshfeld Surfaces ◽  
3D Network ◽  
2D Arrays ◽  
2D Network

AbstractThe investigation of the crystal structures of three closely related sulfonamides, namely N-(2-fluorobenzoyl)-2-methylbenzenesulfonamide (I), N-(2-fluorobenzoyl)-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide (II) and N-(2-fluorobenzoyl)-2-chlorobenzenesulfonamide (III) by analysing intermolecular interactions and the packing patterns, and also by Hirshfeld surface analyses is presented. Compound (I) has a three-dimensional (3D) network, in which N–H···O and C–H···F chains build up two-dimensional (2D) arrays, which are extended into a 3D network through C–H···π interactions. In (II), alternating N–H···O and C–H···O rings form one-dimensional (1D) ribbons, which are interconnected by C–H···π interactions to build a 2D network. In (III), 2D sheets comprising N–H···O rings, C–H···π chains, Cl···F and F···F contacts are stacked by π···π interactions to form a 3D network. Hirshfeld surface analyses, comprising d

scholarly journals A Survey of Supramolecular Aggregation Based on Main Group Element⋯Selenium Secondary Bonding Interactions—A Survey of the Crystallographic Literature

Crystals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward R. T. Tiekink
Keyword(s):  
Crystal Structures ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Main Group ◽  
Group Element ◽  
The Other ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Supramolecular Architectures ◽  
Main Group Element ◽  
Supramolecular Aggregation ◽  
Secondary Bonding

The results of a survey of the crystal structures of main group element compounds (M = tin, lead, arsenic, antimony, bismuth, and tellurium) for intermolecular M⋯Se secondary bonding interactions is presented. The identified M⋯Se interactions in 58 crystals can operate independent of conventional supramolecular synthons and can sustain zero-, one-, two, and, rarely, three-dimensional supramolecular architectures, which are shown to adopt a wide variety of topologies. The most popular architecture found in the crystals stabilized by M⋯Se interactions are one-dimensional chains, found in 50% of the structures, followed by zero-dimensional (38%). In the majority of structures, the metal center forms a single M⋯Se contact; however, examples having up to three M⋯Se contacts are evident. Up to about 25% of lead(II)-/selenium-containing crystals exhibit Pb⋯Se tetrel bonding, a percentage falling off to about 15% in bismuth analogs (that is, pnictogen bonding) and 10% or lower for the other cited elements.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document