scholarly journals Give Them Fish or Teach Them to Fish? The Effects of Stability of Social Stratification and Forms of Help on Higher Socioeconomic Status Group Members’ Attitudes Towards Anti-Poverty Programs-CORRIGENDUM

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Social Stratification ◽  
Status Group ◽  
Group Members ◽  
Socioeconomic Status Group

scholarly journals Give Them Fish or Teach Them to Fish? The Effects of Stability of Social Stratification and Forms of Help on Higher Socioeconomic Status Group Members’ Attitudes Towards Anti-Poverty Programs

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Austin Jay P. Ferolino
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Social Stratification ◽  
Cash Transfer ◽  
Theoretical Contribution ◽  
Transfer Programs ◽  
The Social ◽  
Group Members ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Socioeconomic Status Group ◽  
Social Identity Approach

Building on social identity approach and intergroup helping as status relations model, the current research examined the explored effects of stability of social stratification and forms of help on higher socioeconomic status (SES) members’ attitudes towards anti-poverty programs. Two studies were conducted in a 2 (social stratification stability) × 2 (forms of help) design on willingness to support anti-poverty programs. Study 1 examined the conditions of unstable and stable social stratification that might pattern differences in support of hypothetical anti-poverty programs construed as dependency-oriented or autonomy-oriented help. Study 2 replicated and extended study 1 by examining higher SES (subjective) participants’ attitudes towards the cash transfer programs (conditional vs. unconditional, which were determined by their perceptions of the stability of social stratification). Overall, the results of the two studies confirmed that attitudes towards anti-poverty programs could be construed as specific forms of help (dependency-oriented and/or autonomy-oriented help) depending on the nature of the intergroup relations (stability of the social stratification). Finally, the theoretical contribution of the current research is discussed.

scholarly journals Predominancyof Coping Styles in Patients with Type II Diabetes in Low Socio Economic Status Groups

2022 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-167
Author(s):  
Selvakumar Jagannathan
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Type Ii Diabetes ◽  
Coping Style ◽  
Coping Styles ◽  
Training Programme ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
Status Group ◽  
Socioeconomic Status Group

Background: Coping style is a person’s characteristic strategies used in response to life problems or traumas. Coping serves a protective function .This study aims to examine the impact of coping styles predominance in the training programme given to patients with type II diabetes of low socioeconomic status group.30 patients with type II diabetes of low socioeconomic status group were selected using purposive sampling from the diabetic clinic for the assessment of coping style. Coping style was assessed using “Coping styles of adults with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes” by Karlsen and Bru (1998). Paired t-test was used to assess the effectiveness of coping styles enhancement training programme for patients with type II diabetes. The study revealed that there is significant increase in the level of coping styles of patients with type II diabetes due to coping styles enhancement training programme.

An exploration of language use by high and low status group members

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gideon Mazambani ◽  
Maria Carlson ◽  
Stephen Reysen
Keyword(s):  
Language Use ◽  
Status Group ◽  
Group Members

Academic Achievement and Identity of Low Status Group Members

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chad A. Johnson ◽  
Justin Aoki ◽  
Justin Wheeler ◽  
Peizhong Li
Keyword(s):  
Academic Achievement ◽  
Status Group ◽  
Group Members

Low-status group members in the intergroup paradigm: Social identity and derogation of the ingroup

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick J. Munhall ◽  
Mark Alicke ◽  
G. Daniel Lassiter ◽  
Amy Rosenblatt ◽  
Leah Collins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Identity ◽  
Status Group ◽  
Group Members

scholarly journals Optimal Proxy Selection for Socioeconomic Status Inference on Twitter

Complexity ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob Levy Abitbol ◽  
Eric Fleury ◽  
Márton Karsai
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Social Stratification ◽  
Census Data ◽  
Predictive Performance ◽  
Residential Areas ◽  
Scientific Discussion ◽  
Combination Methods ◽  
Twitter Users ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Professional Occupation

Individual socioeconomic status inference from online traces is a remarkably difficult task. While current methods commonly train predictive models on incomplete data by appending socioeconomic information of residential areas or professional occupation profiles, little attention has been paid to how well this information serves as a proxy for the individual demographic trait of interest when fed to a learning model. Here we address this question by proposing three different data collection and combination methods to first estimate and, in turn, infer the socioeconomic status of French Twitter users from their online semantics. We assess the validity of each proxy measure by analyzing the performance of our prediction pipeline when trained on these datasets. Despite having to rely on different user sets, we find that training our model on professional occupation provides better predictive performance than open census data or remote sensed expert annotation of habitual environments. Furthermore, we release the tools we developed in the hope it will provide a generalizable framework to estimate socioeconomic status of large numbers of Twitter users as well as contribute to the scientific discussion on social stratification and inequalities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document