scholarly journals Efficacy of a sleep health intervention to optimize standard smoking cessation treatment response: results from a pilot randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-117
Author(s):  
Freda Patterson ◽  
Michael A. Grandner ◽  
Susan K. Malone ◽  
Ryan T. Pohlig ◽  
Rebecca L. Ashare ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Treatment Response ◽  
Sex Education ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Treatment Seeking ◽  
Sleep Health ◽  
Smoking Cessation Treatment ◽  
Cessation Treatment ◽  
End Of Treatment

AbstractBackgroundWe tested if an adjunctive sleep health (SH) intervention improved smoking cessation treatment response by increasing quit rates. We also examined if baseline sleep, and improvements in sleep in the first weeks of quitting, were associated with quitting at the end of treatment.MethodsTreatment-seeking smokers (N = 29) aged 21–65 years were randomized to a SH intervention (n = 16), or general health (GH) control (n = 13) condition. Participants received six counseling sessions across 15-weeks: SH received smoking cessation + SH counseling; GH received smoking cessation + GH counseling. Counseling began 4-weeks before the target quit date (TQD), and varenicline treatment began 1-week prior to TQD. Smoking status and SH were assessed at baseline (week 1), TQD (week 4), 3 weeks after cessation (week 7), week 12, and at the end of treatment (EOT; week 15).ResultsSH versus GH participants had higher Carbon Monoxide (CO) -verified, 7-day point prevalence abstinence at EOT (69% vs. 54%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.40–10.69, P = 0.77). Higher baseline sleep efficiency (aOR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.03–1.96, P = 0.03), predicted higher EOT cessation. Models were adjusted for age, sex, education, and baseline nicotine dependence.ConclusionsImproving SH in treatment-seeking smokers prior to cessation warrants further examination as a viable strategy to promote cessation.

The Use of Self-Directed Relapse Prevention Booklets to Assist in Maintaining Abstinence After a 6-Week Group Smoking Cessation Treatment Program: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 190-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Veldheer ◽  
Shari Hrabovsky ◽  
Jessica Yingst ◽  
Chris Sciamanna ◽  
Arthur Berg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Treatment Program ◽  
Group Treatment ◽  
Relapse Prevention ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Treatment Method ◽  
Smoking Cessation Treatment ◽  
Cessation Treatment ◽  
Intensive Group

Background. Identifying effective relapse prevention interventions is a vital step to help smokers maintain abstinence for the long term. Aims. The purpose of this study is to determine if providing recently quit smokers with self-directed relapse prevention booklets is effective at maintaining abstinence after intensive group smoking cessation treatment. Method. Two hundred and twenty-five participants were randomized to receive Forever Free (FF) relapse prevention booklets or a control booklet (Surgeon General’s report, SG) at the end of a 6-week group treatment program. Participants were then contacted by phone to assess whether they had read the materials. Smoking status was assessed 6 months after their target quit date. Primary analyses focused on the 115 participants who quit at the end of treatment. Results. There was no difference in the 6-month quit rate between groups (40.7% quit FF vs. 44.6% quit SG, p = .67). The FF group read a significantly smaller proportion of the materials versus the control booklet (20.0% read most or all of FF vs. 72.0% of SG, p < .001). Conclusion. Forever Free self-directed relapse prevention booklets did not reduce relapse or enhance cessation over general tobacco and health information when added to intensive group smoking cessation treatment. However, this study lacked power to detect a small but clinically meaningful positive effect.

scholarly journals Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Novel Smoking Cessation App Designed for Individuals With Co-Occurring Tobacco Use Disorder and Serious Mental Illness

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 1533-1542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger Vilardaga ◽  
Javier Rizo ◽  
Paige E Palenski ◽  
Paolo Mannelli ◽  
Jason A Oliver ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Illness ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Tobacco Use ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Smoking Cessation Treatment ◽  
Tobacco Use Disorder ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Cessation Treatment ◽  
Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract Introduction High rates of tobacco use among people with serious mental illness (SMI), along with their unique needs, suggest the importance of developing tailored smoking cessation interventions for this group. Previous early-phase work empirically validated the design and content of Learn to Quit, a theory-based app designed for this population. Methods In a pilot randomized controlled trial, we compared the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of Learn to Quit versus QuitGuide, an app designed for the general population. All participants received nicotine replacement therapy and technical assistance. Daily smokers with SMI (N = 62) participated in the trial with outcomes assessed at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16. Results Compared to QuitGuide, Learn to Quit participants had similar number of days of app use (34 vs. 32, p = .754), but larger number of app interactions (335 vs. 205; p = .001), longer durations of app use (4.24 hrs. vs. 2.14 hrs; p = .044), and higher usability scores (85 vs. 79, p = .046). At week 16, Learn to Quit led to greater reductions in cigarettes per day (12.3 vs. 5.9 for QuitGuide; p = 0.10). Thirty-day point prevalence abstinence was verified in 12% of Learn to Quit participants versus 3% of QuitGuide participants (odds ratio = 3.86, confidence interval = 0.41 to 36, p = .239). Changes in psychiatric symptoms and adverse events were not clinically significant between conditions. Conclusions This pilot trial provides strong evidence of Learn to Quit’s usability, feasibility, and safety. Preliminary evidence suggests the app may be efficacious. A randomized controlled efficacy trial is needed to test the app in a larger sample of smokers with SMI. Implications This study suggests that the Learn to Quit app is a feasible approach to deliver smoking cessation treatment in patients with co-occurring tobacco use disorder and SMI. This means that, if found efficacious, this technology could be used to deploy smoking cessation treatment to larger segments of this population, hence improving public health. Therefore, a randomized controlled trial should be conducted to examine the efficacy of this digital intervention.

scholarly journals Depression, anxiety, stress, and motivation over the course of smoking cessation treatment

2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 433-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maritza Muzzi Cardozo Pawlina ◽  
Regina de Cássia Rondina ◽  
Mariano Martinez Espinosa ◽  
Clóvis Botelho
Keyword(s):  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Rhode Island ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Behavioral Therapy ◽  
Treatment Success ◽  
Wilcoxon Test ◽  
Patient Anxiety ◽  
Smoking Cessation Treatment ◽  
Cessation Treatment ◽  
Anxiety Depression

Objective: To evaluate changes in the levels of patient anxiety, depression, motivation, and stress over the course of smoking cessation treatment. Methods: This cohort study involved patients enrolled in a smoking cessation program in Cuiabá, Brazil. We selected patients who completed the program in six months or less (n = 142). Patient evaluations were conducted at enrollment (evaluation 1 [E1]); after 45 days of treatment with medication and cognitive-behavioral therapy (E2); and at the end of the six-month study period (E3). Patients were evaluated with a standardized questionnaire (to collect sociodemographic data and determine smoking status), as well as with the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment scale, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory, and Lipp Inventory of Stress Symptoms for Adults. The data were analyzed with the nonparametric Wilcoxon test for paired comparisons. To compare treatment success (smoking cessation) with treatment failure, the test for two proportions was used. Results: Among the 142 patients evaluated, there were improvements, in terms of the levels of anxiety, depression, motivation, and stress, between E1 and E2, as well as between E1 and E3. In addition, treatment success correlated significantly with the levels of motivation and anxiety throughout the study period, whereas it correlated significantly with the level of depression only at E2 and E3. Conclusions: We conclude that there are in fact changes in the levels of patient anxiety, depression, motivation, and stress over the course of smoking cessation treatment. Those changes appear to be more pronounced in patients in whom the treatment succeeded.

scholarly journals Gender differences in personality patterns and smoking status after a smoking cessation treatment

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bárbara Piñeiro ◽  
Ana López-Durán ◽  
Elena Fernández del Río ◽  
Úrsula Martínez ◽  
Elisardo Becoña
Keyword(s):  
Gender Differences ◽  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Smoking Cessation Treatment ◽  
Cessation Treatment ◽  
Personality Patterns

scholarly journals Self‐help educational booklets for the prevention of smoking relapse following smoking cessation treatment: a randomized controlled trial

Addiction ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 110 (12) ◽  
pp. 2006-2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivienne Maskrey ◽  
Annie Blyth ◽  
Tracey J. Brown ◽  
Garry R. Barton ◽  
Caitlin Notley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Smoking Relapse ◽  
Smoking Cessation Treatment ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Self Help ◽  
Cessation Treatment

scholarly journals The Preliminary Efficacy and Feasibility of Group-Based Smoking Cessation Treatment Program for Incarcerated Smokers

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 155798832094335
Author(s):  
Pamela Valera ◽  
Nicholas Acuna ◽  
Ismary Vento
Keyword(s):  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Treatment Program ◽  
Group Treatment ◽  
Electronic Cigarettes ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Exhaled Breath ◽  
Smoking Cessation Treatment ◽  
Nicotine Patches ◽  
Cessation Treatment

Group-based tobacco dependence treatment has been known to help smokers to quit in general adult populations, but the feasibility and efficacy of this type of smoking cessation treatment in correctional settings remain uncertain. A 6-week group-based smoking cessation treatment with nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in the form of nicotine patches was implemented in seven male prison facilities, in the Northeast, among smokers who were born biologically as male. Exhaled breath carbon monoxide (CO) levels were collected from participants at each session to confirm smoking status. Participants were evaluated at the 1-month post-group treatment follow-up to determine abstinence. Those who were lost to follow-up were recorded as continued smoking and not using NRT nicotine patches. The goal of the study was to explore the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of conducting a smoking cessation treatment program for incarcerated smokers. A total of 350 inmates were screened, 177 inmates were enrolled across the prison sites for the 6-week program, and 102 inmates completed the program. A majority of those enrolled reported that they began smoking when they were between 15 and 19 years of age (44.9%) and were smoking on average for 26 years. Less than half (21.3%) reported ever using electronic cigarettes at baseline and in Session 1,116 individuals who attended reported a median CO level of 18.0 parts per million (ppm). At a 1-month follow-up, 43 individuals reported a median CO level of 5.00 ppm. The study demonstrated preliminary efficacy and feasibility of group-based smoking cessation treatment with NRT nicotine patches in incarcerated smokers.

scholarly journals Increasing access to smoking cessation treatment among Latino smokers using case management

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 168-175
Author(s):  
Francisco Cartujano-Barrera ◽  
Jaime Perales ◽  
Evelyn Arana ◽  
Lisa Sanderson Cox ◽  
Hung-Wen Yeh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Case Management ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Educational Materials ◽  
Smoking Cessation Treatment ◽  
Assistance Programs ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Phone Calls ◽  
Cessation Treatment

AbstractIntroductionDisparities exist among Latino smokers with respect to knowledge and access to smoking cessation resources. This study tested the feasibility of using case management (CM) to increase access to pharmacotherapy and quitlines among Latino smokers.MethodsLatino smokers were randomized to CM (n = 40) or standard care (SC, n = 40). All participants received educational materials describing how to utilize pharmacy assistance for cessation pharmacotherapy and connect with quitlines. CM participants received four phone calls from staff to encourage pharmacotherapy and quitline use. At 6-months follow-up, we assessed the utilization of pharmacotherapy and quitline. Additional outcomes included self-reported smoking status and approval for pharmacotherapy assistance.ResultsUsing intention-to-treat analysis, CM produced higher utilization than SC of both pharmacotherapy (15.0% versus 2.5%; P = 0.108) and quitlines (12.5% versus 5.0%; P = 0.432), although differences were not statistically significant. Approval for pharmacotherapy assistance programs (20.0% versus 0.0%; P = 0.0005) was significantly higher for CM than SC participants. Self-reported point-prevalence smoking abstinence at 6-months were 20.0% and 17.5% for CM and SC, respectively (P = 0.775).ConclusionsCM holds promise as an effective intervention to connect Latino smokers to evidence-based cessation treatment.

The relationship between psychopathology and smoking cessation treatment response

2000 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 267-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Gariti ◽  
Arthur I Alterman ◽  
Frank D Mulvaney ◽  
Louise Epperson
Keyword(s):  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Treatment Response ◽  
Smoking Cessation Treatment ◽  
Cessation Treatment ◽  
The Relationship
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document