Aero-optics of subsonic turbulent boundary layers

2012 ◽  
Vol 696 ◽  
pp. 122-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kan Wang ◽  
Meng Wang
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Dominant Role ◽  
Elevation Angle ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Density Field ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Number Range ◽  
Scale Turbulence

AbstractCompressible large-eddy simulations are carried out to study the aero-optical distortions caused by Mach 0.5 flat-plate turbulent boundary layers at Reynolds numbers of ${\mathit{Re}}_{\theta } = 875$, 1770 and 3550, based on momentum thickness. The fluctuations of refractive index are calculated from the density field, and wavefront distortions of an optical beam traversing the boundary layer are computed based on geometric optics. The effects of aperture size, small-scale turbulence, different flow regions and beam elevation angle are examined and the underlying flow physics is analysed. It is found that the level of optical distortion decreases with increasing Reynolds number within the Reynolds-number range considered. The contributions from the viscous sublayer and buffer layer are small, while the wake region plays a dominant role, followed by the logarithmic layer. By low-pass filtering the fluctuating density field, it is shown that small-scale turbulence is optically inactive. Consistent with previous experimental findings, the distortion magnitude is dependent on the propagation direction due to anisotropy of the boundary-layer vortical structures. Density correlations and length scales are analysed to understand the elevation-angle dependence and its relation to turbulence structures. The applicability of Sutton’s linking equation to boundary-layer flows is examined, and excellent agreement between linking equation predictions and directly integrated distortions is obtained when the density length scale is appropriately defined.

Pressure gradient effects on the large-scale structure of turbulent boundary layers

2013 ◽  
Vol 715 ◽  
pp. 477-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zambri Harun ◽  
Jason P. Monty ◽  
Romain Mathis ◽  
Ivan Marusic
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Amplitude Modulation ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Outer Region ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Small Scale

AbstractResearch into high-Reynolds-number turbulent boundary layers in recent years has brought about a renewed interest in the larger-scale structures. It is now known that these structures emerge more prominently in the outer region not only due to increased Reynolds number (Metzger & Klewicki, Phys. Fluids, vol. 13(3), 2001, pp. 692–701; Hutchins & Marusic, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 579, 2007, pp. 1–28), but also when a boundary layer is exposed to an adverse pressure gradient (Bradshaw, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 29, 1967, pp. 625–645; Lee & Sung, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 639, 2009, pp. 101–131). The latter case has not received as much attention in the literature. As such, this work investigates the modification of the large-scale features of boundary layers subjected to zero, adverse and favourable pressure gradients. It is first shown that the mean velocities, turbulence intensities and turbulence production are significantly different in the outer region across the three cases. Spectral and scale decomposition analyses confirm that the large scales are more energized throughout the entire adverse pressure gradient boundary layer, especially in the outer region. Although more energetic, there is a similar spectral distribution of energy in the wake region, implying the geometrical structure of the outer layer remains universal in all cases. Comparisons are also made of the amplitude modulation of small scales by the large-scale motions for the three pressure gradient cases. The wall-normal location of the zero-crossing of small-scale amplitude modulation is found to increase with increasing pressure gradient, yet this location continues to coincide with the large-scale energetic peak wall-normal location (as has been observed in zero pressure gradient boundary layers). The amplitude modulation effect is found to increase as pressure gradient is increased from favourable to adverse.

Heat Transfer in Turbulent Boundary Layers Subjected to Free-Stream Turbulence—Part I: Experimental Results

2003 ◽  
Vol 125 (2) ◽  
pp. 232-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Barrett ◽  
D. Keith Hollingsworth
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Free Stream ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Length Scale ◽  
Momentum Thickness ◽  
Free Stream Turbulence

Turbulent boundary layers were subjected to grid-generated free-stream turbulence to study the effects of length scale and intensity on heat transfer. Relative to conventional boundary layer thickness measures, test conditions included very small-scale free-stream turbulence. The boundary layers studied ranged from 400–2700 in momentum-thickness Reynolds number and from 450–1900 in enthalpy-thickness Reynolds number. Free-stream turbulence intensities varied from 0.1–8.0%. Ratios of free-stream length scale to boundary-layer momentum thickness ranged from 4.4–32.5. The turbulent-to-viscous length-scale ratios presented are the smallest found in the heat-transfer literature; the ratios spanned from 115–1020. The turbulent-to-thermal ratios (using enthalpy thickness as the thermal scale) are also the smallest reported; the ratios ranged from 3.2–12.3. Relative to clean-free-stream expectations based on the momentum- and enthalpy-thickness Reynolds numbers, the skin friction coefficient increased by up to 16%, and the Stanton number increased by up to 46%.

Governing Parameters of Adverse Pressure Gradient Turbulent Boundary Layers

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yvan Maciel ◽  
Tie Wei ◽  
Ayse G. Gungor ◽  
Mark P. Simens
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Outer Region ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Inertial Parameter ◽  
Velocity Scale ◽  
Gradient Parameter

We perform a careful nondimensional analysis of the turbulent boundary layer equations in order to bring out, without assuming any self-similar behaviour, a consistent set of nondimensional parameters characterizing the outer region of turbulent boundary layers with arbitrary pressure gradients. These nondimensional parameters are a pressure gradient parameter, a Reynolds number (different from commonly used ones) and an inertial parameter. They are obtained without assuming a priori the outer length and velocity scales. They represent the ratio of the magnitudes of two types of forces in the outer region, using the Reynolds shear stress gradient (apparent turbulent force) as the reference force: inertia to apparent turbulent forces for the inertial parameter, pressure to apparent turbulent forces for the pressure gradient parameter and apparent turbulent to viscous forces for the Reynolds number. We determine under what conditions they retain their meaning, depending on the outer velocity scale that is considered, with the help of seven boundary layer databases. We find the impressive result that if the Zagarola-Smits velocity is used as the outer velocity scale, the streamwise evolution of the three ratios of forces in the outer region can be accurately followed with these non-dimensional parameters in all these flows — not just the order of magnitude of these ratios. This cannot be achieved with three other outer velocity scales commonly used for pressure gradient turbulent boundary layers. Consequently, the three new nondimensional parameters, when expressed with the Zagarola-Smits velocity, can be used to follow — in a global sense — the streamwise evolution of the stream-wise mean momentum balance in the outer region. This study provides a clear and consistent framework for the analysis of the outer region of adverse-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers.

Passive Manipulation of Separation-Bubble Transition Using Surface Modifications

2009 ◽  
Vol 131 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian R. McAuliffe ◽  
Metin I. Yaras
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Shear Layer ◽  
Separation Bubble ◽  
Surface Modifications ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Vortex Pairing ◽  
Separated Shear Layer ◽  
Scale Turbulence

Through experiments using two-dimensional particle-image velocimetry (PIV), this paper examines the nature of transition in a separation bubble and manipulations of the resultant breakdown to turbulence through passive means of control. An airfoil was used that provides minimal variation in the separation location over a wide operating range, with various two-dimensional modifications made to the surface for the purpose of manipulating the transition process. The study was conducted under low-freestream-turbulence conditions over a flow Reynolds number range of 28,000–101,000 based on airfoil chord. The spatial nature of the measurements has allowed identification of the dominant flow structures associated with transition in the separated shear layer and the manipulations introduced by the surface modifications. The Kelvin–Helmholtz (K-H) instability is identified as the dominant transition mechanism in the separated shear layer, leading to the roll-up of spanwise vorticity and subsequent breakdown into small-scale turbulence. Similarities with planar free-shear layers are noted, including the frequency of maximum amplification rate for the K-H instability and the vortex-pairing phenomenon initiated by a subharmonic instability. In some cases, secondary pairing events are observed and result in a laminar intervortex region consisting of freestream fluid entrained toward the surface due to the strong circulation of the large-scale vortices. Results of the surface-modification study show that different physical mechanisms can be manipulated to affect the separation, transition, and reattachment processes over the airfoil. These manipulations are also shown to affect the boundary-layer losses observed downstream of reattachment, with all surface-indentation configurations providing decreased losses at the three lowest Reynolds numbers and three of the five configurations providing decreased losses at the highest Reynolds number. The primary mechanisms that provide these manipulations include: suppression of the vortex-pairing phenomenon, which reduces both the shear-layer thickness and the levels of small-scale turbulence; the promotion of smaller-scale turbulence, resulting from the disturbances generated upstream of separation, which provides quicker transition and shorter separation bubbles; the elimination of the separation bubble with transition occurring in an attached boundary layer; and physical disturbance, downstream of separation, of the growing instability waves to manipulate the vortical structures and cause quicker reattachment.

Pressure Gradient Effects on Smooth- and Rough-Surface Turbulent Boundary Layers—Part II: Adverse Pressure Gradient

2014 ◽  
Vol 137 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ju Hyun Shin ◽  
Seung Jin Song
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Boundary Layer Thickness ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Roughness Effects ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Velocity Defect

An experimental investigation has been conducted to identify the effects of pressure gradient and surface roughness on turbulent boundary layers. In Part II, smooth- and rough-surface turbulent boundary layers with and without adverse pressure gradient (APG) are presented at a fixed Reynolds number (based on the length of flat plate) of 900,000. Flat-plate boundary layer measurements have been conducted using a single-sensor, hot-wire probe. For smooth surfaces, compared to the zero pressure gradient (ZPG) boundary layer, the APG boundary layer has a higher mean velocity defect throughout the boundary layer and lower friction coefficient. APG decreases the streamwise normal Reynolds stress for y less than 0.4 times the boundary layer thickness and increases it slightly in the outer region. For rough surfaces, APG reduces the roughness effects of increasing the mean velocity defect and normal Reynolds stress for y less than 23 and 28 times the average roughness height, respectively. Consistently, for the same roughness, APG decreases the integrated streamwise turbulent kinetic energy. APG also decreases the roughness effect on the friction coefficient, roughness Reynolds number, and roughness shift. Compared to the ZPG boundary layers, the roughness effects on integral boundary layer parameters—boundary layer thickness and momentum thickness—are weaker under APG. Thus, contrary to the favorable pressure gradient (FPG) in part I, APG reduces the roughness effects on turbulent boundary layers.

The structure of turbulent boundary layers

1967 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 741-773 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. J. Kline ◽  
W. C. Reynolds ◽  
F. A. Schraub ◽  
P. W. Runstadler
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Dominant Role ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Low Speed ◽  
Quantitative Studies ◽  
Break Up ◽  
Low Speed Streaks ◽  
Dimensionless Correlations

Extensive visual and quantitative studies of turbulent boundary layers are described. Visual studies reveal the presence of surprisingly well-organized spatially and temporally dependent motions within the so-called ‘laminar sublayer’. These motions lead to the formation of low-speed streaks in the region very near the wall. The streaks interact with the outer portions of the flow through a process of gradual ‘lift-up’, then sudden oscillation, bursting, and ejection. It is felt that these processes play a dominant role in the production of new turbulence and the transport of turbulence within the boundary layer on smooth walls.Quantitative data are presented providing an association of the observed structure features with the accepted ‘regions’ of the boundary layer in non-dimensional co-ordinates; these data include zero, negative and positive pressure gradients on smooth walls. Instantaneous spanwise velocity profiles for the inner layers are given, and dimensionless correlations for mean streak-spacing and break-up frequency are presented.Tentative mechanisms for formation and break-up of the low-speed streaks are proposed, and other evidence regarding the implications and importance of the streak structure in turbulent boundary layers is reviewed.

History effects and near equilibrium in adverse-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers

2017 ◽  
Vol 820 ◽  
pp. 667-692 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Bobke ◽  
R. Vinuesa ◽  
R. Örlü ◽  
P. Schlatter
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
History Effects ◽  
Displacement Thickness ◽  
Gradient Parameter

Turbulent boundary layers under adverse pressure gradients are studied using well-resolved large-eddy simulations (LES) with the goal of assessing the influence of the streamwise pressure-gradient development. Near-equilibrium boundary layers were characterized through the Clauser pressure-gradient parameter $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$. In order to fulfil the near-equilibrium conditions, the free stream velocity was prescribed such that it followed a power-law distribution. The turbulence statistics pertaining to cases with a constant value of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$ (extending up to approximately 40 boundary-layer thicknesses) were compared with cases with non-constant $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$ distributions at matched values of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$ and friction Reynolds number $Re_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}}$. An additional case at matched Reynolds number based on displacement thickness $Re_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}^{\ast }}$ was also considered. It was noticed that non-constant $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$ cases appear to approach the conditions of equivalent constant $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$ cases after long streamwise distances (approximately 7 boundary-layer thicknesses). The relevance of the constant $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$ cases lies in the fact that they define a ‘canonical’ state of the boundary layer, uniquely characterized by $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$ and $Re$. The investigations on the flat plate were extended to the flow around a wing section overlapping in terms of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$ and $Re$. Comparisons with the flat-plate cases at matched values of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$ and $Re$ revealed that the different development history of the turbulent boundary layer on the wing section leads to a less pronounced wake in the mean velocity as well as a weaker second peak in the Reynolds stresses. This is due to the weaker accumulated effect of the $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$ history. Furthermore, a scaling law suggested by Kitsios et al. (Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow, vol. 61, 2016, pp. 129–136), proposing the edge velocity and the displacement thickness as scaling parameters, was tested on two constant-pressure-gradient parameter cases. The mean velocity and Reynolds-stress profiles were found to be dependent on the downstream development. The present work is the first step towards assessing history effects in adverse-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers and highlights the fact that the values of the Clauser pressure-gradient parameter and the Reynolds number are not sufficient to characterize the state of the boundary layer.

Influence of the Wake Component on Turbulent Skin Friction at Subsonic and Supersonic Speeds

1979 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 590-606 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.G. Mabey
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Wind Tunnel ◽  
Velocity Profile ◽  
Skin Friction ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Significant Influence ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Number Range ◽  
Reynolds Number Range ◽  
Friction Measurements

SummarySome velocity profile and skin friction measurements for turbulent boundary layers at subsonic and supersonic speeds are reviewed to derive the magnitude of the wake component and the effects of its variation with Reynolds number on predictions of skin friction. As Reynolds number increases the wake component increases rapidly, reaches a maximum and then decreases. The measurements considered suggest that this maximum may be higher at supersonic speeds than at subsonic speeds. This wake component variation has a significant influence on predictions of skin friction in the Reynolds number range of interest on wind tunnel models.

Scaling of the bursting frequency in turbulent boundary layers

1983 ◽  
Vol 132 ◽  
pp. 87-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. F. Blackwelder ◽  
J. H. Haritonidis
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Spatial Resolution ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Wall Region ◽  
Constant Independent ◽  
Spatial Averaging ◽  
Number Range ◽  
The Past ◽  
Resolution Problem

The bursting frequency in turbulent boundary layers has been measured over the Reynolds-number range 103 < U∞/ν < 104. When scaled with the variables appropriate for the wall region, the non-dimensional frequency was constant independent of Reynolds number. A strong effect of the sensor size was noted on the measured bursting frequency. Only sensors having a spatial scale less than twenty viscous lengthscales were free from spatial-averaging effects and yielded consistent results. The spatial-resolution problem was apparently the reason for erroneous results reported in the past.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document