POLITICAL TIES AND FIRM PERFORMANCE IN CHINA: EVIDENCE FROM A QUANTILE REGRESSION

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 331-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenjing Xie ◽  
Keji Liu ◽  
Fei Xie ◽  
Haoyuan Ding
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Quantile Regression ◽  
Economic Performance ◽  
Positive Relationship ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Political Ties ◽  
Regression Framework ◽  
A Share

AbstractWhether political ties enhance or weaken firm performance has been widely investigated in a number of studies, including some on China. Based on a database of non-financial A-share listed firms from 2004 to 2012, we study the effects of political ties on firm performance within a quantile regression framework. We find that there is a positive relationship between political ties and economic performance, but that it is diminishing with respect to firm performance. Political ties appear particularly important for weaker firms.

scholarly journals The Impact of Corporate Board Size on Firm Performance: Evidence from Ghana and Nigeria

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
LjEbenezer Agyemang Badu ◽  
K.O. Appiah
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Agency Theory ◽  
Firm Size ◽  
Positive Relationship ◽  
Empirical Support ◽  
Corporate Board ◽  
Board Size ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Different Types ◽  
The Impact

This paper examines the impact of corporate board size on firm performance for a sample of 137 listed firms in Ghana and Nigeria. Our findings suggest a statistically significant and positive relationship between board size and firm performance, implying that in Ghana and Nigeria allowing corporate board size to be dependent of firm size tends to improve firm performance. Our findings are consistent across different kinds of models that deal with different types of endogeneities and corporate performance proxies. Our results provide empirical support for agency theory, which suggests that optimal corporate board size effectively advise, monitor and discipline management thereby improving firm performance.

scholarly journals Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: A Quantile Regression Approach

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (13) ◽  
pp. 3717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nana Liu ◽  
Chuanzhe Liu ◽  
Quan Guo ◽  
Bowen Da ◽  
Linna Guan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Quantile Regression ◽  
Information Disclosure ◽  
Financial Constraints ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
The Impact ◽  
A Share

A prominent claim within the literature is that corporate social responsibility-disclosured firms are fundamentally more resilient to financial shocks, relative to firms that take no corporate social responsibility action. To test this, we examine the impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) information disclosure on financial constraints (FC). Our sample is composed of A-share publicly listed firms from Shanghai and Shenzhen in China during 2013–2017. We find that CSR disclosure influences negatively financial constraints. The quantile regression results also indicate that the influences would more obvious when a company faces stronger financial constraints. Further, CSR disclosure influences negatively financial constraints in financially opaque firms, and the effect of financial opaque on the relationship strengthens when the company faces great financial constraints. After considering the problems of missing variables and endogenous, changing the level of CSR and FC measurement, using 2SLS and two-step GMM methods, the conclusion is still robust. However, the results should not be generalized, since the sample was based on 434 A-share publicly listed firms for 2013–2017. From the perspective of FC, this study contributes to the literature in the field of CSR and expands the empirical research on the economic consequences of CSR. It also can encourage enterprises to voluntarily disclose social responsibility information and it is of great significance to promote the stable development of the capital market and society.

scholarly journals Managerial ownership and firm performance on selected JSE listed firms

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 233-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandisiwe Zondi ◽  
Mabutho Sibanda
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Least Squares ◽  
Agency Theory ◽  
Positive Relationship ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Retail Sector ◽  
Regression Analyses ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
And Performance

This paper investigates if there is a relationship between managerial ownership and firm performance in selected firms listed on the JSE, and if so, what that relationship is. The study conducts regression analyses over a sample of 23 retail sector firms, observing data stretching from 2010 to 2013. The results are found to be robust. The results suggest that the hypothesis that a positive relationship exists between managerial ownership and performance be rejected as a negative relationship is found. Instead, the results of a two-stage least squares (2SLS) analysis find that managerial ownership does not impact firm performance in any direction. Overall the results of the study do not support the agency theory, as aligning the interests of managers and shareholders does not improve firm performance, at least within the retail sector

scholarly journals The effect of board composition and managerial pay on Saudi firm performance

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh Al-Faryan
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Firm Performance ◽  
Positive Relationship ◽  
Board Composition ◽  
Board Independence ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Managerial Pay ◽  
Governance Arrangements

AbstractUsing five empirical methodologies to account for endogeneity issues, this study investigates the effects of board independence and managerial pay on the performance of 169 Saudi listed firms between 2007 and the end of 2014. Studying board independence and managerial pay utilises the main internal governance mechanism in relation to firm performance; therefore, the effect of the 2009 exogenous regulatory shock on board independence was also examined to learn whether it impacted firm performance. The empirical results show that the board composition–performance relationship is endogenous. Strong evidence is found through the dynamic generalised method of moments estimation, which indicates that board composition has a positive relationship with return on assets, and poor past performance of listed firms has a negative impact on the current level of performance. The difference-in-differences approach results show a positive relationship between board composition, stock returns, and Tobin’s Q. The findings also reveal that managerial pay has a positive relationship with firm performance, although when endogeneity is considered, there is a smaller positive relationship and a decrease in significance levels. Thus, pay-for-performance in Saudi Arabia matters, and firms are not simply controlled by the government. The results of this study have implications for both policy makers and investors. In particular, policy makers and Saudi regulators can evaluate the impact of Saudi corporate governance arrangements and, in so doing, highlight changes in corporate governance arrangements that need to be made to achieve their economic objectives, such as Vision 2030. This study also contributes to the literature by showing the importance of considering endogeneity in studies.

scholarly journals CEO Compensation, Managerial Overconfidence and Performance of Sharia Compliant Firms and Non-Sharia Compliant Firms: Evidence from Listed GCC Firms

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 159-177
Author(s):  
Gaafar Mohamed Abdalkrim
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Ceo Compensation ◽  
Positive Relationship ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Financial Report ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Managerial Overconfidence ◽  
Exchange Data

Background: The positive relationship between managerial overconfidence and performance implies that overconfident managers overestimate their ability to create value and improve their firm’s performance, which also lead to overestimate their own firms returns by taking over other firms. Purpose: The study examines relationship between managerial overconfidence, CEO compensation, and performance of sharia compliant firms and non-sharia compliant firms for 207 GCC listed firms from 2010 to 2014. Methodology: The study sample comprised of 207 firms for the main empirical analysis. The data used in this study were collected from GCC stock exchange data-base and firms financial report provided by website argaam.com between 2010 and 2018. Findings: The study found that managerial overconfidence is positively and significantly related to firm performance. CEO compensation and managerial overconfidence is also associated positively with sharia–compliant firms’ performance. The findings supported first hypothesis that managerial overconfidence leads to better firms’ performance. Originality: The study has revealed a positive impact of sharia compliant firms’ managerial overconfidence on firm performance. Furthermore, the effect of CEO compensation is favorable in sharia compliant firms.

scholarly journals Environmental, Social, Governance Activities and Firm Performance: Evidence from China

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 767
Author(s):  
Lei Ruan ◽  
Heng Liu
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Emerging Markets ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Listed Companies ◽  
Regulatory Agencies ◽  
Rating Data ◽  
Social Governance ◽  
Environmentally Sensitive ◽  
Regulatory Measures ◽  
A Share

Increasingly noticeable environmental and risk problems have made more and more companies and regulatory agencies realize the importance of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) activities. However, on the question that whether ESG activities have promoted or reduced firm performance, there is still no consensus. Especially for China, a representative country in emerging markets whose corporate ESG activities are still in their infancy and related systems and regulatory measures not complete, its theoretical and practical circles more urgently need to know an accurate answer to this question. Therefore, this article takes China’s Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed companies that have ESG rating data from 2015 to 2019 as samples and finds that corporate ESG activities have a significantly negative impact on firm performance. Further research finds that compared with state-owned enterprises and environmentally sensitive enterprises, non-state-owned enterprises and non-environmentally sensitive enterprises provide stronger evidence to support the above conclusions.

The impact of intellectual capital on firm performance: a study of Indian firms listed in COSPI

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 935-964 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neha Smriti ◽  
Niladri Das
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Intellectual Capital ◽  
Value Creation ◽  
Generalized Method Of Moments ◽  
Value Added ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Share Price ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
The Impact

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of intellectual capital (IC) on financial performance (FP) for Indian companies listed on the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy Overall Share Price Index (COSPI). Design/methodology/approach Hypotheses were developed according to theories and literature review. Secondary data were collected from Indian companies listed on the COSPI between 2001 and 2016, and the value-added intellectual coefficient (VAIC) of Pulic (2000) was used to measure IC and its components. A dynamic system generalized method of moments (SGMM) estimator was employed to identify the variables that significantly contribute to firm performance. Findings Indian listed firms appear to be performing well and efficiently utilizing their IC. Overall, human capital had a major impact on firm productivity during the study period. Furthermore, the empirical analysis showed that structural capital efficiency and capital employed efficiency were equally important contributors to firm’s sales growth and market value. The growing importance of the contribution of IC to value creation was consistently reflected in the FP of these Indian companies. Practical implications This study has robust theoretical grounds and employs a validated methodology. The present study extends knowledge of IC among academicians and managers and highlights its contribution to value creation. The findings may help stakeholders and policymakers in developing countries properly reallocate intellectual resources. Originality/value This study is the first study to evaluate IC and its relationship with traditional measures of firm performance among Indian listed firms using dynamic SGMM and VAIC models.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document