scholarly journals Cognitive rehabilitation for early stage Alzheimer’s disease: a pilot study with an Irish population

2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. E. Kelly ◽  
B. A. Lawlor ◽  
R. F. Coen ◽  
I. H. Robertson ◽  
S. Brennan

ObjectivesResearch shows that cognitive rehabilitation (CR) has the potential to improve goal performance and enhance well-being for people with early stage Alzheimer’s disease (AD). This single subject, multiple baseline design (MBD) research investigated the clinical efficacy of an 8-week individualised CR intervention for individuals with early stage AD.MethodsThree participants with early stage AD were recruited to take part in the study. The intervention consisted of eight sessions of 60–90 minutes of CR. Outcomes included goal performance and satisfaction, quality of life, cognitive and everyday functioning, mood, and memory self-efficacy for participants with AD; and carer burden, general mental health, quality of life, and mood of carers.ResultsVisual analysis of MBD data demonstrated a functional relationship between CR and improvements in participants’ goal performance. Subjective ratings of goal performance and satisfaction increased from baseline to post-test for three participants and were maintained at follow-up for two. Baseline to post-test quality of life scores improved for three participants, whereas cognitive function and memory self-efficacy scores improved for two.ConclusionsOur findings demonstrate that CR can improve goal performance, and is a socially acceptable intervention that can be implemented by practitioners with assistance from carers between sessions. This study represents one of the promising first step towards filling a practice gap in this area. Further research and randomised-controlled trials are required.

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 1-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Clare ◽  
Aleksandra Kudlicka ◽  
Jan R Oyebode ◽  
Roy W Jones ◽  
Antony Bayer ◽  
...  

BackgroundCognitive rehabilitation (CR) is an individualised, person-centred intervention for people with mild to moderate dementia that addresses the impact of cognitive impairment on everyday functioning.ObjectivesTo determine whether or not CR is a clinically effective and cost-effective intervention for people with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease or vascular or mixed dementia, and their carers.DesignThis multicentre randomised controlled trial compared CR with treatment as usual (TAU). Following a baseline assessment and goal-setting to identify areas of everyday functioning that could be improved or better managed, participants were randomised (1 : 1) via secure web access to an independent randomisation centre to receive either TAU or CR and followed up at 3 and 9 months post randomisation.SettingCommunity.ParticipantsParticipants had anInternational Classification of Diseases, Tenth Edition, diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease or vascular or mixed dementia, had mild to moderate cognitive impairment (Mini Mental State Examination score of ≥ 18 points), were stable on medication if prescribed, and had a family carer who was willing to contribute. The exclusion criteria were people with a history of brain injury or other neurological disorder and an inability to speak English. To achieve adequate power, we needed 350 people to complete the trial, with 175 people in each trial arm.InterventionCognitive rehabilitation consisted of 10 therapy sessions over 3 months, followed by four maintenance sessions over 6 months, delivered in participants’ homes. The therapists were nine occupational therapists and one nurse.Outcome measuresThe primary outcome was self-reported goal attainment at 3 months. Goal attainment was also assessed at 9 months. Carers provided independent ratings of goal attainment at both time points. The secondary outcomes were participant quality of life, mood, self-efficacy and cognition, and carer stress, health status and quality of life. The assessments at 3 and 9 months were conducted by researchers who were blind to the participants’ group allocation.ResultsA total of 475 participants were randomised (CR arm,n = 239; TAU arm,n = 236), 427 participants (90%) completed the trial and 426 participants were analysed (CR arm,n = 208, TAU arm,n = 218). At 3 months, there were statistically significant large positive effects for participant-rated goal attainment [mean change in the CR arm: 2.57; mean change in the TAU arm: 0.86; Cohen’sd = 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75 to 1.19], corroborated by carer ratings (Cohen’sd = 1.11, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.34). These effects were maintained at 9 months for both the participant ratings (Cohen’sd = 0.94, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.17) and the carer ratings (Cohen’sd = 0.96, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.20). There were no significant differences in the secondary outcomes. In the cost–utility analyses, there was no evidence of cost-effectiveness in terms of gains in the quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of the person with dementia (measured using the DEMentia Quality Of Life questionnaire utility score) or the QALYs of the carer (measured using the EuroQol-5 Dimensions, three-level version) from either cost perspective. In the cost-effectiveness analyses, by reference to the primary outcome of participant-rated goal attainment, CR was cost-effective from both the health and social care perspective and the societal perspective at willingness-to-pay values of £2500 and above for improvement in the goal attainment measure. There was no evidence on the cost-effectiveness of the self-efficacy measure (the Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale) from either cost perspective.LimitationsPossible limitations arose from the non-feasibility of using observational outcome measures, the lack of a general measure of functional ability and the exclusion of people without a carer or with rarer forms of dementia.ConclusionsCognitive rehabilitation is clinically effective in enabling people with early-stage dementia to improve their everyday functioning in relation to individual goals targeted in the therapy sessions.Future workNext steps will focus on the implementation of CR into NHS and social care services and on extending the approach to people with rarer forms of dementia.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN21027481.FundingThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full inHealth Technology Assessment; Vol. 23, No. 10. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.


2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 27-37
Author(s):  
Angie L. Sardina, PhD ◽  
Suzanne Fitzsimmons, MSN, ARNP, GNP ◽  
Catherine M. Hoyt, BA ◽  
Linda L. Buettner, PhD

This study evaluated whether a mentally stimulating activities (MSA) program reduced neuropsychiatric symptoms and improved cognitive status and quality of life, as compared to a support group for persons in the early stage of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). This randomized controlled trial included 81 adults (aged 55+), who were randomly assigned to the MSA group (treatment) or a social support group (control). A repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) identified that MSA participants significantly reduced apathy (p 0.001) and depressive symptoms (p 0.001), as well as improved cognitive status (p 0.001) and quality of life (p 0.001) as compared to the control group. A structured classroom-style MSA program may be a viable and therapeutic intervention to alleviate neuropsychiatric symptoms, and improve cognitive status and quality of life in early-stage AD.


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. S545-S546
Author(s):  
P. Osvath ◽  
V. Voros ◽  
A. Kovacs ◽  
I. Greges ◽  
S. Fekete ◽  
...  

AimWith an increasingly growing population in Europe, cognitive impairment is a major social and health issue. According to the World Alzheimer Report (WHO, 2014), dementia, including Alzheimer's disease is one of the biggest global public health challenges our generation is facing. There are many efforts at European level to promote active and healthy ageing. This three-year project has the ambition to provide new services for integrated care with breakthrough research and radical innovation by employing user-friendly Information and Communication Technology (ICT) tools, ultimately increasing patients’ quality-of-life and autonomy at home.MethodsICT4Life proposes an innovative platform for integrated care by the use of sensor-based analytics for human behaviour. Novel ICT services are used to determine the relation between cognitive decline, related psychopathological symptoms and the quality-of-life of the patients, and to assess how these affect patients’ and caregivers’ daily living. ICT4Life platform uses advanced sensor-based analytics; to maximize elderly empowerment and self-care abilities thanks to a properly designed and reconfigurable recommendation system that will be able to exploit user-generated data; and to improve decision-making processes in care professionals’ daily activities. All solutions are developed following a user-centred methodology and tested in real-life scenarios.ResultsThe study design and the preliminary results of the ICT4Life project are presented on the poster.ConclusionICT4Life programme develops a solution for individuals with early stage cognitive impairment that will permit doctors and caregivers to extract useful information about patients, while contributing in a user-friendly way to extending their independence.Disclosure of interestCOI: This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement N° 690090. Tamas Tenyi and Sandor Fekete are supported by the National Brain Research Program Grant N° NAP KTIA NAP-A-II/12.


2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 109-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helena Kisvetrová ◽  
David Školoudík ◽  
Roman Herzig ◽  
Martin Vališ ◽  
Božena Jurašková ◽  
...  

Background/Aims: The aim of this study was to perform a psychometric validation of the Czech version of the Quality of Life – Alzheimer’s Disease scale (QoL-AD) for patients with early-stage dementia. Methods: The sample included 212 patient-proxy pairs. For convergent validity, the Czech version of the Bristol Activities of Daily Living Scale (BADLS-CZ), the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), and the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) were used. Results: The reliability of the QoL-AD for patients and caregivers was good (Cronbach’s α = 0.85, ICC = 0.25–0.54). A positive correlation existed between the QoL-AD and the SPPB, and negative correlations existed between the QoL-AD and the BADLS-CZ as well as between the QoL-AD and the GDS. Factor analysis resulted in a three-factor solution (physical and mental health, family life, and social security). Conclusion: The Czech version of the QoL-AD has good psychometric properties in compliance with international recommendations.


2010 ◽  
Vol 51 (02) ◽  
pp. 72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oscar Rosas Carrasco ◽  
Laura del Pilar Torres Arreola ◽  
María de Guadalupe Guerra Silla ◽  
Sara Torres Castro ◽  
Luis Miguel Gutiérrez Robledo

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 427-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandrine Andrieu ◽  
Nicola Coley ◽  
Yves Rolland ◽  
Christelle Cantet ◽  
Catherine Arnaud ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 497-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Clegg ◽  
Jackie Bryant ◽  
Tricia Nicholson ◽  
Linda McIntyre ◽  
Sofie De Broe ◽  
...  

Objectives: Systematic review of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine for people suffering from Alzheimer's disease.Methods: Sixteen electronic databases (including MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and Embase) and bibliographies of related papers were searched for published/unpublished English language studies, and experts and pharmaceutical companies were consulted for additional information. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and economic studies were selected. Clinical effectiveness was assessed on measurement scales assessing progression of Alzheimer's disease on the person's global health, cognition, functional ability, behavior and mood, and quality of life. Cost-effectiveness was presented as incremental cost per year spent in a nonsevere state (by Mini Mental Health State Examination) or quality-adjusted life-year.Results: Twelve of 15 RCTs included were judged to be of good quality. Although donepezil had beneficial effects in Alzheimer's patients on global health and cognition, rivastigmine on global health, and galantamine on global health, cognition, and functional scales, these improvements were small and may not be clinically significant. Measures of quality of life and behavior and mood were rarely assessed. Adverse effects were usually mild and transient. Cost-effectiveness base case estimates ranged from £2,415 savings to £49,476 additional cost (1997 prices) per unit of effect for donepezil and a small savings for rivastigmine. Estimates were not considered robust or generalizable.Conclusions: Donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine appear to have some clinical effect for people with Alzheimer's disease, although the extent to which these translate into real differences in everyday life remains unclear. Due to the nature of current economic studies, cost-effectiveness remains uncertain and the impact on different care sectors has been inadequately investigated. Further research is needed to establish the actual benefits of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEls) for people with Alzheimer's disease and their caregivers, the relationship of these changes to clinical management, and careful prospective evaluation of resource and budgetary consequences.


2010 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keika Inouye ◽  
Elisete Silva Pedrazzani ◽  
Sofia Cristina Iost Pavarini ◽  
Cristina Yoshie Toyoda

This paper aimed to compare the reports of patients and caregivers about how they perceive quality of life (QoL) in general and each of its dimensions in elderly with Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). The participants were elderly diagnosed with AD (n=53) attended by the Exceptional Medication Program in a city in the interior of Sao Paulo; and their respective family caregivers. The QoL measures were obtained through the Quality of Life Assessment Scale on Alzheimer’s Disease. The results showed statistically significant differences in the “memory” (p<0.05) and “you in general” (p<0.005) dimensions. Regarding the final score, the average in the patient’s version was 29.32 points (sd=6.27), against 28.33 points (sd=5.58) in the family version, p>0.100. Although the relative and patient reports were not identical, the results pointed to a high level of consistency among information.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document