scholarly journals Provision of Hepatitis A Vaccine by Paramedics During Noncritical Patient Interactions: Lessons Learned

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s362-s362
Author(s):  
Christine McGuire-Wolfe ◽  
Timothy Reardon

Background: Hepatitis A cases have been regularly increasing in Florida since 2016, after remaining relatively stable for several years. Between January 1, 2019, and October 19, 2019, 2,847 cases of hepatitis were reported to the Florida Department of Health, including 2,209 hospitalizations and 41 deaths due to infection with hepatitis A1. At least 93% of these cases was acquired within the state of Florida.1 During this outbreak, Pasco County clearly emerged as a focal point for new cases. As of week 42 of 2019, Pasco County was the second-highest county for new cases (n = 484) and the leading county for deaths due to hepatitis A infection (n = 8). Risk factors identified from hepatitis A cases reported between January 1, 2019, and October 19, 2019, included any drug use (57%), injection drug use (37%), noninjection drug use (35%), homelessness (22%), and being a man who had sexual intercourse with other men (MSM, 4%).1 Moreover, 33% of newly reported cases were interviewed and denied risk factors; 1 (20%) had recently been incarcerated or was currently incarcerated.1 Individuals with these risk factors are often individuals who also require emergency medical services (EMS). On August 1, 2019, a public health emergency (PHE) was issued for the entire state of Florida. The existence of a PHE allows for paramedics to administer vaccine (with the approval of the fire rescue medical director). Pasco County Fire Rescue routinely operates 28 advanced life support (ALS) ambulances with either a crew of 2 paramedics or a paramedic/EMT pair. On October 7, 2019, the Pasco County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approved a Memorandum of Understanding between the Florida Department of Health in Pasco County, the Pasco County Fire Rescue Medical Director, and the BCC for ALS crews to provide hepatitis A vaccination to noncritical (ie, basic life support) patients during routine contact. This effort appears to be the first within the of Florida. Pasco County Fire Rescue (PCFR) began stocking hepatitis A vaccine on January 1, 2020 and ceased participation in the program on March 1, 2020. During the window of participation, PCFR responded to approximately 6,570 calls in which the patient would have been non-critical and eligible for hepatitis A vaccination. Twelve hepatitis A vaccinations (0.18%) were administered. Crews verbalized concerns about adding vaccination to their job description, feelings of being overwhelmed with existing emergency medical services (EMS) responsibilities, apathy regarding the potential benefit of provision of vaccine, and perception that successful participation in a vaccine campaign would lead to additional community paramedicine responsibilities. The vaccine program was terminated early due to the significant demands on EMS as SARS-CoV2 impacted Pasco County. This trial highlights the need for crew investments and buy-in for future partial or full community paramedicine initiatives.1. Florida Department of Health, Hepatitis A Surveillance State Report, Week 42.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 106 (4) ◽  
pp. e54-e54 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. Staes ◽  
T. L. Schlenker ◽  
I. Risk ◽  
K. G. Cannon ◽  
H. Harris ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sarayna S. McGuire ◽  
Anuradha Luke ◽  
Aaron B. Klassen ◽  
Lucas A. Myers ◽  
Aidan F. Mullan ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: Performance feedback on clinical care and patient outcomes is a cornerstone of medical education, yet it remains lacking in the prehospital environment. Research seeking to establish the quantity of feedback provided to Emergency Medical Services (EMS) has been limited and studies focused on complimentary feedback or how feedback relates to EMS job satisfaction are lacking. The objectives of this study were to measure the frequency and nature of feedback received by EMS agencies and to identify the importance of receiving feedback as it relates to EMS job satisfaction. Methods: This was an anonymous, survey-based study of twenty-nine Basic Life Support (BLS) and fifteen Advanced Life Support (ALS) agencies located in Southeastern Minnesota (USA). Descriptive statistics and Fisher exact tests were used. The study was deemed exempt by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board. Results: Ninety-four responses were included from nineteen different EMS agencies, including sixty-one (64.9%) paramedics and thirty-three (35.1%) emergency medical technicians (EMTs). One-half of all respondents reported that they had not received any type of feedback in the past 30 days, while another 43.6% of respondents indicated that they had only received feedback one to three times in the same time period. Twenty (60.6%) EMTs reported receiving no feedback in the past 30 days, compared with twenty-seven (44.3%) paramedics (P = .123). Of respondents receiving feedback, 65.9% reported never or rarely receiving positive reinforcing feedback and 60.6% reported never or rarely receiving constructive criticism or feedback regarding something that did not go well with patient care or transport. The majority of respondents were dissatisfied with the quantity (86.1%) and quality (73.4%) of feedback received. An overwhelming majority (93.6%) indicated that feedback on patient care or outcomes was important in influencing their overall job satisfaction. This high importance was maintained across all demographic groups. Conclusion: Within the cohort of survey respondents, a paucity of feedback received by EMS personnel is a source of dissatisfaction for EMS providers. Feedback on patient care strongly relates to overall job satisfaction. These findings suggest system-wide opportunities for structured feedback processes, focusing upon both quality and quantity of delivered feedback, to improve both patient care and staff satisfaction.


2011 ◽  
Vol 183 (10) ◽  
pp. 1147-1154 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. L. Miller ◽  
M. E. Pearce ◽  
A. Moniruzzaman ◽  
V. Thomas ◽  
C. W. Christian ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 743-747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfonso Mele ◽  
Tommaso Stroffolini ◽  
Filippo Palumbo ◽  
Giovanni Gallo ◽  
Pietro Ragni ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document