Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing at hospital discharge: A systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay M. Daniels ◽  
David J. Weber
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing

AbstractA large proportion of antibiotic use associated with hospitalization occurs immediately after discharge, representing an important focus for antimicrobial stewardship programs. This review identified few studies evaluating the effect of interventions aimed at improving discharge antibiotic prescribing. Antimicrobial stewardship to improve postdischarge antibiotic prescribing is an unmet need warranting further study.

scholarly journals 229. Hospitalists Antimicrobial Scorecard Improves Antibiotic Prescribing at a Community Teaching Hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S116-S116
Author(s):  
Julia Sessa ◽  
Helen Jacoby ◽  
Bruce Blain ◽  
Lisa Avery
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Rank Order ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Measuring antimicrobial consumption data is a foundation of antimicrobial stewardship programs. There is data to support antimicrobial scorecard utilization to improve antibiotic use in the outpatient setting. There is a lack of data on the impact of an antimicrobial scorecard for hospitalists. Our objective was to improve antibiotic prescribing amongst the hospitalist service through the development of an antimicrobial scorecard. Methods Conducted in a 451-bed teaching hospital amongst 22 full time hospitalists. The antimicrobial scorecard for 2019 was distributed in two phases. In October 2019, baseline antibiotic prescribing data (January – September 2019) was distributed. In January 2020, a second scorecard was distributed (October – December 2019) to assess the impact of the scorecard. The scorecard distributed via e-mail to physicians included: Antibiotic days of therapy/1,000 patient care days (corrected for attending census), route of antibiotic prescribing (% intravenous (IV) vs % oral (PO)) and percentage of patients prescribed piperacillin-tazobactam (PT) for greater than 3 days. Hospitalists received their data in rank order amongst their peers. Along with the antimicrobial scorecard, recommendations from the antimicrobial stewardship team were included for hospitalists to improve their antibiotic prescribing for these initiatives. Hospitalists demographics (years of practice and gender) were collected. Descriptive statistics were utilized to analyze pre and post data. Results Sixteen (16) out of 22 (73%) hospitalists improved their antibiotic prescribing from pre- to post-scorecard (χ 2(1)=3.68, p = 0.055). The median antibiotic days of therapy/1,000 patient care days decreased from 661 pre-scorecard to 618 post-scorecard (p = 0.043). The median PT use greater than 3 days also decreased significantly, from 18% pre-scorecard to 11% post-scorecard (p = 0.0025). There was no change in % of IV antibiotic prescribing and no correlation between years of experience or gender to antibiotic prescribing. Conclusion Providing antimicrobial scorecards to our hospitalist service resulted in a significant decrease in antibiotic days of therapy/1,000 patient care days and PT prescribing beyond 3 days. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals A Review of Evidence-Based Recommendations for Pericoronitis Management and a Systematic Review of Antibiotic Prescribing for Pericoronitis among Dentists: Inappropriate Pericoronitis Treatment Is a Critical Factor of Antibiotic Overuse in Dentistry

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (13) ◽  
pp. 6796
Author(s):  
Jan Schmidt ◽  
Martina Kunderova ◽  
Nela Pilbauerova ◽  
Martin Kapitan
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Local Therapy ◽  
Critical Factor ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Narrative Review ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Antibiotic Overuse ◽  
Clinically Significant

This work provides a narrative review covering evidence-based recommendations for pericoronitis management (Part A) and a systematic review of antibiotic prescribing for pericoronitis from January 2000 to May 2021 (Part B). Part A presents the most recent, clinically significant, and evidence-based guidance for pericoronitis diagnosis and proper treatment recommending the local therapy over antibiotic prescribing, which should be reserved for severe conditions. The systematic review includes publications analyzing sets of patients treated for pericoronitis and questionnaires that identified dentists' therapeutic approaches to pericoronitis. Questionnaires among dentists revealed that almost 75% of them prescribed antibiotics for pericoronitis, and pericoronitis was among the top 4 in the frequency of antibiotic use within the surveyed diagnoses and situations. Studies involving patients showed that antibiotics were prescribed to more than half of the patients with pericoronitis, and pericoronitis was among the top 2 in the frequency of antibiotic use within the monitored diagnoses and situations. The most prescribed antibiotics for pericoronitis were amoxicillin and metronidazole. The systematic review results show abundant and unnecessary use of antibiotics for pericoronitis and are in strong contrast to evidence-based recommendations summarized in the narrative review. Adherence of dental professionals to the recommendations presented in this work can help rapidly reduce the duration of pericoronitis, prevent its complications, and reduce the use of antibiotics and thus reduce its impact on patients' quality of life, healthcare costs, and antimicrobial resistance development.

scholarly journals Development of an Electronic Algorithm to Target Outpatient Antimicrobial Stewardship Efforts for Acute Bronchitis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s32-s32
Author(s):  
Ebbing Lautenbach ◽  
Keith Hamilton ◽  
Robert Grundmeier ◽  
Melinda Neuhauser ◽  
Lauri Hicks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Acute Bronchitis ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Diagnostic Codes ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
The Impact

Background: Antibiotic resistance has increased at alarming rates, driven predominantly by antibiotic overuse. Although most antibiotic use occurs in outpatients, antimicrobial stewardship programs have primarily focused on inpatient settings. A major challenge for outpatient stewardship is the lack of accurate and accessible electronic data to target interventions. We sought to develop and validate an electronic algorithm to identify inappropriate antibiotic use for outpatients with acute bronchitis. Methods: This study was conducted within the University of Pennsylvania Health System (UPHS). We used ICD-10 diagnostic codes to identify encounters for acute bronchitis at any outpatient UPHS practice between March 15, 2017, and March 14, 2018. Exclusion criteria included underlying immunocompromising condition, other comorbidity influencing the need for antibiotics (eg, emphysema), or ICD-10 code at the same visit for a concurrent infection (eg, sinusitis). We randomly selected 300 (150 from academic practices and 150 from nonacademic practices) eligible subjects for detailed chart abstraction that assessed patient demographics and practice and prescriber characteristics. Appropriateness of antibiotic use based on chart review served as the gold standard for assessment of the electronic algorithm. Because antibiotic use is not indicated for this study population, appropriateness was assessed based upon whether an antibiotic was prescribed or not. Results: Of 300 subjects, median age was 61 years (interquartile range, 50–68), 62% were women, 74% were seen in internal medicine (vs family medicine) practices, and 75% were seen by a physician (vs an advanced practice provider). On chart review, 167 (56%) subjects received an antibiotic. Of these subjects, 1 had documented concern for pertussis and 4 had excluding conditions for which there were no ICD-10 codes. One received an antibiotic prescription for a planned dental procedure. Thus, based on chart review, 161 (54%) subjects received antibiotics inappropriately. Using the electronic algorithm based on diagnostic codes, underlying and concurrent conditions, and prescribing data, the number of subjects with inappropriate prescribing was 170 (56%) because 3 subjects had antibiotic prescribing not noted based on chart review. The test characteristics of the electronic algorithm (compared to gold standard chart review) for identification of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing were the following: sensitivity, 100% (161 of 161); specificity, 94% (130 of 139); positive predictive value, 95% (161 of 170); and negative predictive value, 100% (130 of 130). Conclusions: For outpatients with acute bronchitis, an electronic algorithm for identification of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing is highly accurate. This algorithm could be used to efficiently assess prescribing among practices and individual clinicians. The impact of interventions based on this algorithm should be tested in future studies.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions to Optimize Treatment of Infections in Nursing Home Residents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 073346482110182
Author(s):  
Sainfer Aliyu ◽  
Jasmine L. Travers ◽  
S. Layla Heimlich ◽  
Joanne Ifill ◽  
Arlene Smaldone
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Nursing Home ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Meta Analyses

Effects of antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) interventions to optimize antibiotic use for infections in nursing home (NH) residents remain unclear. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess ASPs in NHs and their effects on antibiotic use, multi-drug-resistant organisms, antibiotic prescribing practices, and resident mortality. Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using five databases (1988–2020). Nineteen articles were included, 10 met the criteria for quantitative synthesis. Inappropriate antibiotic use decreased following ASP intervention in eight studies with a pooled decrease of 13.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: [4.7, 23.0]; Cochran’s Q = 166,837.8, p < .001, I2 = 99.9%) across studies. Decrease in inappropriate antibiotic use was highest in studies that examined antibiotic use for urinary tract infection (UTI). Education and antibiotic stewardship algorithms for UTI were the most effective interventions. Evidence surrounding ASPs in NH is weak, with recommendations suited for UTIs.

scholarly journals 1119. Implementation of Pediatric Antimicrobial Stewardship Rounds in a Children’s Hospital

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S397-S398
Author(s):  
Natalie Tucker ◽  
Ezzeldin Saleh ◽  
Marcela Rodriguez
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Consumption ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Custom Made ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Individual

Abstract Background Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) are required in all acute care hospitals per The Joint Commission. ASP must adhere to the recommendations laid out by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, but how each ASP chooses to implement these recommendations is left to the individual program. In January 2018, we began formal antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) walking rounds, led by infectious diseases trained physician and pharmacist, in our 99-bed pediatric hospital. Methods In January 2018, we started twice-weekly AMS rounds on the pediatric hospitalist service. A custom-made “Antimicrobial Stewardship Patient List” was designed in our electronic medical record (EMR) to generate a list of all patients receiving antibiotics. The ASP team (comprised of an infectious diseases pharmacist and a pediatric infectious diseases physician) reviewed EMR charts to determine antibiotic prescribing appropriateness and design recommended interventions. Any recommendations and teaching points were then discussed with the hospitalist team in person. After piloting the hospitalist service, AMS rounds were extended to include the general surgery patients and finally the intensive care unit. Data on number of charts reviewed, proposed interventions, and acceptance rates were collected throughout the process. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the intervention data. Results In the first year of the program, 427 patient charts were reviewed with 186 identified interventions. In total, 156 (84.3%) of the interventions were accepted and implemented by the primary team. The most common types of interventions were the duration of therapy (29%), antibiotic discontinuation (16.7%), intravenous to oral conversion (11.3%), de-escalation (10.2%), and infectious diseases consult (5.9%). Conclusion Pediatric AMS rounds led to the successful implementation of the majority of recommended interventions. Future goals of the program include calculating days of therapy per 1000 patient-days to assess antibiotic consumption before and after AMS rounds and to expand into other services to further promote appropriate antibiotic use in hospitalized pediatric patients. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Perceptions, Current Practices and Interventions of Community Pharmacists Regarding Antimicrobial Stewardship: A Qualitative Study in France

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire Durand ◽  
Aude Chappuis ◽  
Eric Douriez ◽  
Frédérique Poulain ◽  
Raheelah Ahmad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Antimicrobial Resistance ◽  
Community Health ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Thematic Analysis ◽  
Community Pharmacists ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Community Health Care

Abstract Background: Community health care accounts for the vast majority of antibiotic use in Europe. Given the threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), there is an urgent need to develop new antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions in primary care that could involve different health care providers including community pharmacists. This study aimed to explore the perceptions, currents practices and interventions of community pharmacists regarding antimicrobial stewardship.Methods: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with community pharmacists in France. Participants were recruited through a professional organization of community pharmacists combined with a snowballing technique. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used while developing the interview guide and carrying out thematic analysis.Results: Sixteen community pharmacists participated. All the respondents had good awareness about antimicrobial resistance and believed community pharmacists had an important role in tackling AMR. Some barriers to community pharmacists’ participation in AMS were identified such as difficult interactions with prescribers, lack of time and lack of access to patient medical records and diagnosis. Increased patient education, audits and feedback of antibiotic prescribing, increased point-of-care testing and delayed prescribing were interventions suggested by the pharmacists to improve antibiotic use in primary care. Strategies cited by participants to facilitate the implementation of such interventions are increased pharmacist-general practitioner collaboration, specialized training, clinical decision support tools as well as financial incentives. Conclusions: This study suggests that community pharmacists could play a greater role in infection management and AMS interventions. Further interprofessional collaboration is needed to optimize antibiotic prescribing and utilization in community health care.

scholarly journals A Systematic Review to Examine the Effectiveness of Antibiotic Educational Programs in Outpatient Settings at Reducing Antibiotic Prescribing?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathew Reynolds
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Antibiotic Resistance ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Educational Programs ◽  
Drop Out ◽  
World Health ◽  
Flow Diagram ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Inpatient Settings ◽  
Outpatient Settings

Antibiotic resistance has been identified by both the Center for Disease Control and the World Health Organization as a worldwide epidemic. Antimicrobial stewardship programs have been utilized at inpatient settings that include educational programs about antibiotic resistance. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of antimicrobial resistance education in outpatient settings. The databases searched were MEDLINE, PubMed, Google Scholar and CINAHL. PRISMA checklist and flow diagram were used for identifying the randomized control trials for the systematic review. A total of five articles were identified and organized using data collection tables. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist was used to assess the quality of the trials. All five of the articles showed improvement in overall antibiotic prescribing with education in an outpatient setting. Limitations to the studies included patient/provider drop-out rates, changing diagnoses to order antibiotics, lack of inclusion of all antibiotics ordered by practices, time of year the studies took place, and provider access to training regardless of being in sample. Implications for advanced practice nursing were identified as education, starting antibiotic research, utilizing APRN in research and leadership were discussed. Further research is indicated in the effectiveness of outpatient teaching to reduce antibiotic resistance as well as other areas of research the antimicrobial stewardship programs are utilizing in the inpatient settings.

scholarly journals A pragmatic randomized trial of a primary care antimicrobial stewardship intervention in Ontario, Canada

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Warren McIsaac ◽  
Sahana Kukan ◽  
Ella Huszti ◽  
Leah Szadkowski ◽  
Braden O’Neill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Care Provider ◽  
Primary Care Provider ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Tract Infections

Abstract Background More than 90% of antibiotics are prescribed in primary care, but 50% may be unnecessary. Reducing unnecessary antibiotic overuse is needed to limit antimicrobial resistance. We conducted a pragmatic trial of a primary care provider-focused antimicrobial stewardship intervention to reduce antibiotic prescriptions in primary care. Methods Primary care practitioners from six primary care clinics in Toronto, Ontario were assigned to intervention or control groups to evaluate the effectiveness of a multi-faceted intervention for reducing antibiotic prescriptions to adults with respiratory and urinary tract infections. The intervention included provider education, clinical decision aids, and audit and feedback of antibiotic prescribing. The primary outcome was total antibiotic prescriptions for these infections. Secondary outcomes were delayed prescriptions, prescriptions longer than 7 days, recommended antibiotic use, and outcomes for individual infections. Generalized estimating equations were used to estimate treatment effects, adjusting for clustering by clinic and baseline differences. Results There were 1682 encounters involving 54 primary care providers from January until May 31, 2019. In intervention clinics, the odds of any antibiotic prescription was reduced 22% (adjusted Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.78; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 0.64.0.96). The odds that a delay in filling a prescription was recommended was increased (adjusted OR=2.29; 95% CI=1.37, 3.83), while prescription durations greater than 7 days were reduced (adjusted OR=0.24; 95% CI=0.13, 0.43). Recommended antibiotic use was similar in control (85.4%) and intervention clinics (91.8%, p=0.37). Conclusions A community-based, primary care provider-focused antimicrobial stewardship intervention was associated with a reduced likelihood of antibiotic prescriptions for respiratory and urinary infections, an increase in delayed prescriptions, and reduced prescription durations. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03517215).

scholarly journals Social and Contextual Influences on Antibiotic Prescribing and Antimicrobial Stewardship: A Qualitative Study with Clinical Commissioning Group and General Practice Professionals

Antibiotics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 859
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Borek ◽  
Sibyl Anthierens ◽  
Rosalie Allison ◽  
Cliodna Mcnulty ◽  
Philip Anyanwu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Practice ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Contextual Factors ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Social Characteristics ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Contextual Influences ◽  
Staff Shortage ◽  
Appropriate Prescribing ◽  
System Approaches

Antibiotic prescribing in England varies considerably between Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) and general practices. We aimed to assess social and contextual factors affecting antibiotic prescribing and engagement with antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) initiatives. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 22 CCG professionals and 19 general practice professionals. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically. Social/contextual influences were grouped into the following four categories: (1) Immediate context, i.e., patients’ social characteristics (e.g., deprivation and culture), clinical factors, and practice and clinician characteristics (e.g., “struggling” with staff shortage/turnover) were linked to higher prescribing. (2) Wider context, i.e., pressures on the healthcare system, limited resources, and competing priorities were seen to reduce engagement with AMS. (3) Collaborative and whole system approaches, i.e., communication, multidisciplinary networks, leadership, and teamwork facilitated prioritizing AMS, learning, and consistency. (4) Relativity of appropriate prescribing, i.e., “high” or “appropriate” prescribing was perceived as relative, depending on comparators, and disregarding different contexts, but social norms around antibiotic use among professionals and patients seemed to be changing. Further optimization of antibiotic prescribing would benefit from addressing social/contextual factors and addressing wider health inequalities, not only targeting individual clinicians. Tailoring and adapting to local contexts and constraints, ensuring adequate time and resources for AMS, and collaborative, whole system approaches to promote consistency may help promote AMS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document