scholarly journals A Systematic Review to Examine the Effectiveness of Antibiotic Educational Programs in Outpatient Settings at Reducing Antibiotic Prescribing?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathew Reynolds

Antibiotic resistance has been identified by both the Center for Disease Control and the World Health Organization as a worldwide epidemic. Antimicrobial stewardship programs have been utilized at inpatient settings that include educational programs about antibiotic resistance. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of antimicrobial resistance education in outpatient settings. The databases searched were MEDLINE, PubMed, Google Scholar and CINAHL. PRISMA checklist and flow diagram were used for identifying the randomized control trials for the systematic review. A total of five articles were identified and organized using data collection tables. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist was used to assess the quality of the trials. All five of the articles showed improvement in overall antibiotic prescribing with education in an outpatient setting. Limitations to the studies included patient/provider drop-out rates, changing diagnoses to order antibiotics, lack of inclusion of all antibiotics ordered by practices, time of year the studies took place, and provider access to training regardless of being in sample. Implications for advanced practice nursing were identified as education, starting antibiotic research, utilizing APRN in research and leadership were discussed. Further research is indicated in the effectiveness of outpatient teaching to reduce antibiotic resistance as well as other areas of research the antimicrobial stewardship programs are utilizing in the inpatient settings.

Author(s):  
Ehsan Nabovati ◽  
Zhila TaherZadeh ◽  
Saeid Eslami ◽  
Ameen Abu-Hanna ◽  
Reza Abbasi

Abstract Background Antibiotic prescribing is common worldwide. There are several original studies about antibiotic prescribing in the healthcare setting of Iran reporting different levels of prescribing. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the prevalence of antibiotic prescribing in both inpatient and outpatient settings in Iran, an example of a developing country. Methods To identify published studies on antibiotic prescribing, databases such as ISI, Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Electronic Persian were searched in Iran till January 2020. Eligible studies were those analyzing original data on the prescription and use of antibiotics in outpatient or inpatient settings in Iran. Moreover, all studies that used an intervention to improve antibiotic prescribing were included. The quality of the included studies was assessed using self-administered quality assessment criteria. The meta-analysis of prevalence of antibiotic prescribing was conducted based on the meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology guidelines. To calculate pooled rates, the random-effects model was used. Results A total of 54 studies (39 outpatients and 15 inpatients) were included in this study. The median of antibiotic prescribing in the outpatient and inpatient settings accounted for 45.25% and 68.2% of patients, respectively. The results of meta-analysis also showed that the antibiotic prescribing accounted for 45% of prescriptions in outpatient settings and 39.5%, 66%, and 75.3% of patients in all wards, pediatrics wards, and ICU wards of inpatient settings, respectively. The most commonly prescribed antibiotic classes in outpatient settings were penicillins, cephalosporins, and macrolides, while in inpatient settings, these were cephalosporins, penicillins, and carbapenems. There were seven studies using interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing pattern. It should be mentioned that intervention in a study had a statistically significant effect on improving antibiotic prescribing (p < .05). Conclusion Prevalence of antibiotic prescribing in Iran is high. Our findings highlight the need for urgent action to improve prescription practices. It seems that developing a national plan to improve antibiotic prescribing is necessary.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Master R.O. Chisale ◽  
Sheena Ramazanu ◽  
Joseph Tsung-Shu Wu ◽  
Frank W. Sinyiza ◽  
Thokozani Bvumbwe ◽  
...  

Abstract Background World Health Organisation (WHO) has approved and recommended several public health measures to halt the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The implementation of recommended interventions vary between higher income and Low and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs). The economical constraints within LMICs posed challenges in accessing resources for COVID-19 prevention. The study aimed to identify the workable community-based interventions being utilised in LMICs.Main body We applied systematic review approach for this study. Included articles were searched in eight online databases. The analysis was guided by the acceptable of best practice developed by the PROSPERO and COCHRANE for systematic search and selection of articles using pre-defined search terms. Furthermore, a PRISMA flow diagram was used to show the number of articles retrieved, retained, excluded with rationales given for every action. Studies conducted on community-based intervention for preventing COVID-19 and levels of knowledge, attitudes and practice (KAP) on community-based intervention for preventing COVID-19 regardless of the design were included. A mixed method appraisal tool (MMAT) was used to appraise studies.Six studies from LMICs were included for detail analysis after the systematic review screening process from 10,100 articles. The quality assessment using MMAT tool appraised these articles were all in highest quality. Among the six articles, 10 community-based interventions were implemented in LMICs. The three key workable and implemented interventions are: use of masks, social distance and hand wash. The review identified varying levels of KAP between LMICs and social-demographical factors affecting KAP in these settings.Conclusion This systematic review has identified the community-based interventions implemented in LMICs to prevent COVID-19 during the pandemic and key factors affecting the level of KAP among the population. This study re-affirms the importance of effective and suitable implementation of the identified interventions. More studies need to be conducted in LMICs to establish the effectiveness and adoption of the implemented and recommended interventions.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S49-S50
Author(s):  
Philip Chung ◽  
Regina Nailon ◽  
M Salman Ashraf ◽  
Scott Bergman ◽  
Teresa Micheels ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Nebraska (NE) ranks among the highest states for per capita antibiotic (AB) use in outpatient (OP) settings. Nebraska Medicine (NM) partnered with NE Antimicrobial Stewardship Assessment and Promotion Program (ASAP), a program funded by NE DHHS via a CDC grant, to reduce AB prescribing for acute bronchitis in OP settings. Methods The antimicrobial stewardship (AS) pilot program targeted NM OP clinics during winter 2018. All OP facility clinicians were notified of the availability of online AS educational videos. In addition, 5 primary care clinics (PCC) received clinician-directed interventions that included acute respiratory infection management pocket guides and posters for display in workrooms. Another 5 PCC received both clinician- and patient-directed interventions (examination room patient empowerment posters, Be Antibiotic Aware pledge cards and brochures). We compared AB prescribing rates for acute bronchitis between January and April 2017 and January and April 2018 among the 2 PCC groups and a control group of 5 immediate care clinics/emergency departments (ICC/ED). Clinicians in all 10 PCC were surveyed to assess usefulness of the AS campaign. Results A total of 593 acute bronchitis diagnosis encounters were included. AB prescribing rates for acute bronchitis for the 15 sites decreased from 53.7% to 43.6% (P = 0.02). Prescribing rates were unchanged in ICC/ED that received only notification of online educational videos (40.8% vs. 41.5%, P = 1.00) but were reduced in clinics that received clinician-directed (74.5% vs. 33.3%, P < 0.01) and patient-directed (61.1% vs. 48.8%, P = 0.07) interventions. Azithromycin was the most commonly prescribed AB (31.5% in 2017 and 29.8% in 2018). After the AS campaign, only the clinician-directed intervention group saw a reduction in azithromycin prescribing (33.3% vs. 13.9%, P < 0.05). Out of 51 clinicians who completed the survey, 45.1% felt campaign tools facilitated meaningful discussion with patients. Workroom posters and pocket guides were reported by 47.1% and 39.2% to be somewhat or extremely helpful, respectively. Conclusion This OP AS campaign led to a significant reduction in AB prescribing. Successful OP AS campaigns need multifaceted approaches but targeted clinician interventions appear most beneficial. Disclosures All Authors: No reported Disclosures.


2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 139-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan D. Spigelman ◽  
Shane Rendalls ◽  
Mary-Louise McLaws ◽  
Ashleigh Gray

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the context for strategies to overcome antimicrobial resistance in Australia, which may provide valuable learnings for other jurisdictions. Design/methodology/approach – Non-systematic review of literature from websites of national, state and territory health departments and interviews with key stakeholders for Australian strategies to reduce antimicrobial resistance. Findings – In July 2015 all states and territories in Australia adopted the National Antimicrobial Resistance Strategy 2015-2019, which is built on the World Health Organization policy package to combat antimicrobial resistance. This strategy represents “the collective, expert views of stakeholders on how best to combat antimicrobial resistance in Australia. It will also support global and regional efforts, recognising that no single country can manage the threat of antimicrobial resistance alone”. It combines quantitative and qualitative monitoring strategies with frameworks and guidelines to improve management of the use of antimicrobial resistant drugs. Prior to this, health services and states developed and implemented initiatives aimed at monitoring and improving prescribing practices. Development of the national strategy has encouraged and fostered debate within the Australian health system and a raft of new policy initiatives. Research limitations/implications – Surveillance strategies are in place to monitor impact and trends at jurisdictional and sector levels. However, actual impact on antimicrobial resistance and prescribing practices remains to be seen as existing initiatives are expanded and new initiatives implemented. Practical implications – This overview of key Australian initiatives balancing quantitative and qualitative surveillance, accreditation, research, education, community awareness and price signals on antibiotic prescribing practices may be valuable to health systems in developing local strategies. Originality/value – The authors provide an up to date overview of the context, strategies and aims of antimicrobial stewardship in Australia.


2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i50-i50
Author(s):  
N Trotter ◽  
R Karimi ◽  
C Tolley ◽  
S P Slight

Abstract Introduction Antimicrobial drug resistance has been recognised by the World Health Organisation as ‘One of the biggest threats to global health today’.1 As the use of digital systems in the NHS increases, there is huge potential to use systems such as electronic prescribing and clinical decision support as part of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programmes (ASPs) i.e., initiatives to change prescribing practices to promote and monitor use of antimicrobials and preserve their future effectiveness. However, there is a lack of research that has investigated the impact of digital tools as part of ASPs. Aim We aimed to review the literature available on the use of digital antimicrobial stewardship tools on individual outcomes such as antimicrobial usage, length of stay, mortality and cost. Methods A systematic search was performed across three databases (Embase, MEDLINE and CINAHL) using MESH terms and key words relating to antimicrobial stewardship, hospitals, length of stay (LOS), clinical outcomes, cost and mortality. Duplicates were removed and articles screened at the title, abstract and full text stage by two authors (NT and RK) according to our inclusion and exclusion criteria. We included primary research articles that: had implemented an ASPs in an adult hospital setting for at least 6 months, reported antimicrobial usage as defined daily dose per 1000 patient days (DDD/1000) and at least one of the following outcomes: LOS, mortality or cost and discussed an ASP that included a digital component. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. We calculated the percentage change to determine the impact of digital ASPs across all outcomes using the formula (After - Before)/Before x 100 = % Change. Before=pre-implementation results; after= results post-implementation Results We identified 3997 papers across all databases, and included 14 full texts that explored the impact of ASPs including a digital component (Figure 1). Of these, 14 papers reported the DDD/1000, 7 on mortality, 8 on LoS and 6 reported on cost. All studies evaluating DDD/1000 reported a decrease in antimicrobial usage ranging from -8.42% to -61.30%. Reductions in mortality (0 to -79%), LoS (25 to -27%) and costs (-8.42% to -69.19%) were also found. All ASPs utilised a digital component alongside a range of other interventions, such as the creation of formularies, guidelines and education emphasising the importance of using a combined approach in antimicrobial stewardship. Different interventions were found to have their own advantages, for example, education was key to sustainability and feedback was essential to improve prescribing practices. Users of the digital tools found that the tools were generally simple and user friendly, which facilitated their acceptance. Conclusion Our found that ASPs including a digital component were associated with reductions in antimicrobial usage, mortality, length of stay and cost. The positive effects were seen when such tools were combined with other approaches such as education and feedback approaches. We were unable to perform a meta-analysis due to the absence of confidence intervals and odds ratios in many of the included studies. Further research is needed to evaluate the cost-benefit associated with digital ASPs and whether sharing ASPs across multiple sites could reduce the maintenance burden for individual organisations. References 1. World Health Organisation (2020), Antibiotic Resistance Factsheet, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antibiotic-resistance [accessed on 18th October 2020]


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia Menon ◽  
Joel Francis ◽  
Natasha Zdraveska ◽  
Alfred Dusabimana ◽  
Samit Bhattacharyya

Abstract Background Diabetes mellitus (DM) is burgeoning as a global chronic health condition. Some studies suggest that tuberculosis (TB) can even cause diabetes in those not previously known to be diabetic, which as a corollary can add to the already heavy global DM burden. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends screening for DM at the start of TB treatment; however, it remains to be elucidated which patients with TB-induced hyperglycaemia are at risk for developing DM and who would benefit from a more regular follow-up. This systematic review will aim to firstly synthesise literature on the irreversibility of TB-induced hyperglycaemia in individuals with previously undiagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus and secondly to synthesise literature on risk factors for progression from TB-induced hyperglycaemia to overt DM in previously undiagnosed. Methods We will search for relevant studies in electronic databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, PROQUEST, and SCOPUS. Furthermore, references will be hand searched to identify other studies. A flow diagram will be drawn to identify the studies retrieved from each database. We will review all publications that include studies containing data on impaired glucose metabolism upon TB diagnosis, and the quality of all eligible studies will be assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We will further conduct a meta-analysis to pool estimates on the risk of progression of persistent hyperglycaemia to overt DM within this population group, as well as the risk factors for this progression. We will use a random effect model to assess heterogeneity, will carry out sensitivity analysis to explore the influence of a single study on the overall estimate, and will report our findings from our systematic review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA guidelines. Egger’s test will be performed to explore the presence of selective reporting bias. If data allow, we will perform a subgroup/meta-regression analysis. Summary effects will be reported using odds ratio, hazard ratio, and relative risk ratios. Furthermore, any clinical, epidemiological, and public health research gaps we identify will be described in a research proposal.


2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (suppl_2) ◽  
pp. S119-S126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hitoshi Honda ◽  
Norio Ohmagari ◽  
Yasuharu Tokuda ◽  
Caline Mattar ◽  
David K. Warren

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document