scholarly journals Hospital epidemiologists’ and infection preventionists’ opinions regarding hospital-onset bacteremia and fungemia as a potential healthcare-associated infection metric

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (05) ◽  
pp. 536-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymund B. Dantes ◽  
Lilian M. Abbo ◽  
Deverick Anderson ◽  
Lisa Hall ◽  
Jennifer H. Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infection ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Abdominal Infections ◽  
Healthcare Associated

AbstractObjective:To ascertain opinions regarding etiology and preventability of hospital-onset bacteremia and fungemia (HOB) and perspectives on HOB as a potential outcome measure reflecting quality of infection prevention and hospital care.Design:Cross-sectional survey.Participants:Hospital epidemiologists and infection preventionist members of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) Research Network.Methods:A web-based, multiple-choice survey was administered via the SHEA Research Network to 133 hospitals.Results:A total of 89 surveys were completed (67% response rate). Overall, 60% of respondents defined HOB as a positive blood culture on or after hospital day 3. Central line-associated bloodstream infections and intra-abdominal infections were perceived as the most frequent etiologies. Moreover, 61% thought that most HOB events are preventable, and 54% viewed HOB as a measure reflecting a hospital’s quality of care. Also, 29% of respondents’ hospitals already collect HOB data for internal purposes. Given a choice to publicly report central-line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) and/or HOB, 57% favored reporting either HOB alone (22%) or in addition to CLABSI (35%) and 34% favored CLABSI alone.Conclusions:Among the majority of SHEA Research Network respondents, HOB is perceived as preventable, reflective of quality of care, and potentially acceptable as a publicly reported quality metric. Further studies on HOB are needed, including validation as a quality measure, assessment of risk adjustment, and formation of evidence-based bundles and toolkits to facilitate measurement and improvement of HOB rates.

The Past, Present, and Future of Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention in Pediatrics: Catheter-Associated Bloodstream Infections

2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (S1) ◽  
pp. S27-S31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina A. Bryant ◽  
Danielle M. Zerr ◽  
W. Charles Huskins ◽  
Aaron M. Milstone
Keyword(s):  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Prevention Strategies ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infection ◽  
Research Topics ◽  
The Past ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
Current Practices

Central line–associated bloodstream infections cause morbidity and mortality in children. We explore the evidence for prevention of central line–associated bloodstream infections in children, assess current practices, and propose research topics to improve prevention strategies.

scholarly journals Prescription for antibiotics at drug shops and strategies to improve quality of care and patient safety: a cross-sectional survey in the private sector in Uganda

BMJ Open ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. e010632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony K Mbonye ◽  
Esther Buregyeya ◽  
Elizeus Rutebemberwa ◽  
Siân E Clarke ◽  
Sham Lal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Private Sector ◽  
Improve Quality ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Drug Shops

scholarly journals Views and Experiences of Parents and Physicians on the Care Provided to Children with Sickle Cell Disease in Cameroon

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ettamba Agborndip ◽  
Benjamin Momo Kadia ◽  
Domin Sone Majunda Ekaney ◽  
Lawrence Tanyi Mbuagbaw ◽  
David C Rees ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Sickle Cell Disease ◽  
Sickle Cell ◽  
Good Knowledge ◽  
Cell Disease ◽  
National Guidelines ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
North West

AbstractBackgroundSickle Cell Disease (SCD) affects two in 100 Cameroonian new-borns, with 50-90% of affected children dying before their fifth birthday. Despite this burden, there is no national SCD programme in Cameroon. This study aimed to assess parents’ and physicians’ knowledge of SCD, their satisfaction with the quality of care and their recommendations to improve the treatment of SCD in Cameroon.MethodsA multi-centre cross-sectional survey was conducted in English and French, using structured questionnaires distributed in electronic format to physicians throughout Cameroon. Paper-based questionnaires were also administered to parents in the West and North West regions of Cameroon. Data were entered into Microsoft Excel and analysed using the SPSS statistical software.ResultsFifty-four parents and 205 physicians were recruited. We found that 72.2% of parents had good knowledge of SCD, 72.2% of parents were satisfied with the quality of care. Attending a sickle cell clinic (AOR 22, 95% CI 17.70-250) was significantly associated with having good knowledge. Just 14.2% of physicians had good knowledge and 23.3% of physicians were satisfied with the available management standards of SCD. Seeing more than five patients per month (AOR 3.17, 95% CI 1.23-8.20) was significantly associated with having good knowledge. Sickle cell clinics, national guidelines and subsidised treatment were the top three measures proposed by physicians and parents to improve the management of SCD.ConclusionKnowledge of SCD and satisfaction with care were poor among Cameroonian physicians. There is a need for a national programme and a comprehensive system of care for SCD in Cameroon.

scholarly journals Evaluating equity in healthcare: pilot implementation of a self-assessment tool

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Chiarenza ◽  
D Domenig ◽  
S Cattacin
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
The Self ◽  
Vulnerable Groups ◽  
Service Users ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Cross Sectional

Abstract Background Several sets of standards aiming at improving access and quality of care for service users have been published in recent years. Certain standards focused on improving healthcare providers’ responsiveness to specific target groups. The general goal of this research was to improve organisations’ awareness of equity standards that are not focused on specific groups, but on all contributing factors that put vulnerable groups at risk of exclusion. The specific objective was to evaluate the degree of compliance with a set of equity standards in 52 health care organisations from 16 countries. Methods A self-assessment tool (SAT) was developed to allow healthcare organisations to measure their capacity to provide equitable care for service users. The SAT indicates the main areas that should be addressed: equity in policy; equitable access and utilisation; equitable quality of care; equity in participation; promoting equity. A cross-sectional survey addressing participants from pilot-organisations was used for data collection, concerning both the self-reported compliance score with the standards, as well as the additional information provided to support the score assigned. Data were analysed quantitatively as well as qualitatively. Results The findings confirm that healthcare providers do invest in improving equity in the access and delivery of services to vulnerable groups. However, many health organisations have inadequate strategies to address inequities and are insufficiently engaged in improving equity in participation and promoting equity outside the organisation. Conclusions The participating organisations reported a significant impact from use of the self-assessment tool: some received the support from regional/national authorities to continue working on improving equity in healthcare; others linked the equity standards to existing performance-measurement strategies; others invested in new frameworks to improve service users engagement. Key messages The implementation of the SAT contributes to a self-reflective process, involving health professionals and managers, in which gaps and potential improvements are identified. Pilot organisations utilised the SAT as part of a process of increasing their awareness of equity issues and changing their organisational culture.

Physicians’ Perceptions Toward Use of Telemedicine During COVID-19 Pandemic in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
sarah idriss ◽  
walaa alasaadi ◽  
abdullah Aldhuhayyan ◽  
Ahmed alenzi ◽  
Reem alharbi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Health Care Delivery ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Face To Face

BACKGROUND The use of communication technologies to deliver health care remotely is known as telemedicine. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had a variety of consequences for health-care delivery in 2020. As a result, it was necessary to adapt and deliver high-quality care to patients while limiting possible viral exposure for both patients and health-care workers. During the pandemic, physicians employed video visits, phone visits, and electronic written visits (e-consultations), all of which have the ability to provide a comparable quality of care while removing social barriers. OBJECTIVE The study’s aim is to assess physicians’ perspectives and attitudes concerning the usage of telemedicine in Riyadh hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. The main domains of the assessment are physicians’ overall experience with telemedicine use before and during COVID-19, future adaptability to using telemedicine, perceptions about patients’ experience, and the influence of telemedicine on burnout. METHODS Methods: An anonymous 28-question cross-sectional survey was developed using SurveyMonkey and distributed to all physicians from all specialty disciplines across Riyadh city hospitals. RESULTS A total of 362 doctors were included in the study. Among them, 28.7% were consultants, 30.4% were specialists, and 40.9% were residents. Male doctors formed the majority (56.1%). When asked about the frequency of using telemedicine, 41.4% answered “frequently,” 26% responded “occasionally,” and 32.6% said “never.” Thirty one percent of doctors agreed and somewhat agreed that the “quality of care during telemedicine is comparable with face-to-face visits.” About 55% doctors believed that telemedicine consultation is a cost-effective way, compared to face-to-face visits. Most of the doctors were skilled (70%) at telemedicine, and they were also able to solve technology issues during telemedicine visits (54%). Overall, the physicians felt that their patients liked telemedicine: 68% said they felt comfortable using telemedicine and 76% said theyfound that it saved time. As per the burnout question, 4.1% of doctors felt burnout every day, 7.5% felt burnout a few times a week, and 27.3% felt burnout a few times per month. CONCLUSIONS Physicians had a generally favorable attitude toward telemedicine, believing that the quality of health-care delivery using it was comparable to that of in-person care. Future research is needed to investigate how physicians’ attitudes toward telemedicine have changed since the pandemic, as well as how this virtual technology might be used to improve their professional and personal well-being.

Surveillance for Healthcare-Associated Infections: Hospital-Onset Adult Sepsis Events versus Current Reportable Conditions

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brady Page ◽  
Michael Klompas ◽  
Christina Chan ◽  
Michael R Filbin ◽  
Sayon Dutta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Record ◽  
Pay For Performance ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infections ◽  
Urinary Infections ◽  
Abdominal Infections ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
Record Review

Abstract Background U.S. hospitals are required by CMS to publicly report CLABSI, CAUTI, C.diffficile, MRSA bacteremia, and selected SSIs for benchmarking and pay-for-performance programs. It is unclear, however, to what extent these conditions capture the full breadth of serious healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). CDC’s hospital-onset Adult Sepsis Event (HO-ASE) definition could facilitate more comprehensive and efficient surveillance for serious HAIs, but the overlap between HO-ASE and currently reportable HAIs is unknown. Methods We retrospectively assessed the overlap between HO-ASEs and reportable HAIs among adults hospitalized between June 2015-June 2018 in 3 hospitals. Medical record reviews were conducted for 110 randomly selected HO-ASE cases to determine clinical correlates. Results Amongst 282,441 hospitalized patients, 2,301 (0.8%) met HO-ASE criteria and 1,260 (0.4%) had reportable HAIs. In-hospital mortality rates were higher with HO-ASEs than reportable HAIs (28.6% vs 12.9%). Mortality rates for HO-ASE missed by reportable HAIs were substantially higher than mortality rates for reportable HAIs missed by HO-ASE (28.1% vs 6.3%). Reportable HAIs were only present in 334/2,301 (14.5%) HO-ASEs, most commonly CLABSIs (6.0% of HO-ASEs), C.difficile (5.0%), and CAUTI (3.0%). On medical record review, most HO-ASEs were caused by pneumonia (39.1%, of which only 34.9% were ventilator-associated), bloodstream infections (17.4%, of which only 10.5% were central line-associated), non-C.difficile intra-abdominal infections (14.5%), urinary infections (7.3%, of which 87.5% were catheter-associated), and skin/soft tissue infections (6.4%). Conclusions CDC’s HO-ASE definition detects many serious nosocomial infections missed by currently reportable HAIs. HO-ASE surveillance could increase the efficiency and clinical significance of surveillance while identifying new targets for prevention.

scholarly journals Indirect Versus Direct Standardization Methods for Reporting Healthcare-Associated Infections: An Analysis of Central Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections in Maryland

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (8) ◽  
pp. 989-992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lyndsay M. O’Hara ◽  
Max Masnick ◽  
Surbhi Leekha ◽  
Sarah S. Jackson ◽  
Natalia Blanco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infections ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infection ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
Direct Standardization ◽  
Standardization Methods

Whether healthcare-associated infection data should be presented using indirect (current CMS/CDC methodology) or direct standardization remains controversial. We applied both methods to central-line–associated bloodstream infection data from 45 acute-care hospitals in Maryland from 2012 to 2014. We found that the 2 methods generate different hospital rankings with payment implications.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:989–992

Distribution of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections Determined From Washington State’s Annual Reporting Validation Program, 2009–2013

2016 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 489-492
Author(s):  
Jason M. Lempp ◽  
M. Jeanne Cummings ◽  
David W. Birnbaum
Keyword(s):  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Healthcare Quality ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Infect Control Hosp ◽  
Public Healthcare ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infection ◽  
Reporting Accuracy ◽  
Annual Reporting ◽  
Healthcare Associated

Healthcare-associated infection reporting validation is essential because this information is increasingly used in public healthcare quality assurances and care reimbursement. Washington State’s validation of central line-associated bloodstream infection reporting applies credible quality sciences methods to ensure that hospital reporting accuracy is maintained. This paper details findings and costs from our experience.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:489–492

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document