Distribution of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections Determined From Washington State’s Annual Reporting Validation Program, 2009–2013

2016 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 489-492
Author(s):  
Jason M. Lempp ◽  
M. Jeanne Cummings ◽  
David W. Birnbaum
Keyword(s):  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Healthcare Quality ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Infect Control Hosp ◽  
Public Healthcare ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infection ◽  
Reporting Accuracy ◽  
Annual Reporting ◽  
Healthcare Associated

Healthcare-associated infection reporting validation is essential because this information is increasingly used in public healthcare quality assurances and care reimbursement. Washington State’s validation of central line-associated bloodstream infection reporting applies credible quality sciences methods to ensure that hospital reporting accuracy is maintained. This paper details findings and costs from our experience.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:489–492

scholarly journals Indirect Versus Direct Standardization Methods for Reporting Healthcare-Associated Infections: An Analysis of Central Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections in Maryland

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (8) ◽  
pp. 989-992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lyndsay M. O’Hara ◽  
Max Masnick ◽  
Surbhi Leekha ◽  
Sarah S. Jackson ◽  
Natalia Blanco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infections ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infection ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
Direct Standardization ◽  
Standardization Methods

Whether healthcare-associated infection data should be presented using indirect (current CMS/CDC methodology) or direct standardization remains controversial. We applied both methods to central-line–associated bloodstream infection data from 45 acute-care hospitals in Maryland from 2012 to 2014. We found that the 2 methods generate different hospital rankings with payment implications.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:989–992

The Past, Present, and Future of Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention in Pediatrics: Catheter-Associated Bloodstream Infections

2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (S1) ◽  
pp. S27-S31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina A. Bryant ◽  
Danielle M. Zerr ◽  
W. Charles Huskins ◽  
Aaron M. Milstone
Keyword(s):  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Prevention Strategies ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infection ◽  
Research Topics ◽  
The Past ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
Current Practices

Central line–associated bloodstream infections cause morbidity and mortality in children. We explore the evidence for prevention of central line–associated bloodstream infections in children, assess current practices, and propose research topics to improve prevention strategies.

Risk Factors for Central Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections in the Era of Prevention Bundles

2014 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 214-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devin Callister ◽  
Pauline Limchaiyawat ◽  
Samantha J. Eells ◽  
Loren G. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Hemodynamic Monitoring ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Infection Risk ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Infect Control Hosp ◽  
Infection Risk Factors ◽  
Independent Risk Factors

Little is known about central line–associated bloodstream infection risk factors in the bundle era. In our case-control investigation, we found that independent risk factors for central line–associated bloodstream infection at our center included the number of recent lab tests, catheter duration, and lack of hemodynamic monitoring as the insertion indication.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;00(0): 1–3

scholarly journals Hospital epidemiologists’ and infection preventionists’ opinions regarding hospital-onset bacteremia and fungemia as a potential healthcare-associated infection metric

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (05) ◽  
pp. 536-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymund B. Dantes ◽  
Lilian M. Abbo ◽  
Deverick Anderson ◽  
Lisa Hall ◽  
Jennifer H. Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infection ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Abdominal Infections ◽  
Healthcare Associated

AbstractObjective:To ascertain opinions regarding etiology and preventability of hospital-onset bacteremia and fungemia (HOB) and perspectives on HOB as a potential outcome measure reflecting quality of infection prevention and hospital care.Design:Cross-sectional survey.Participants:Hospital epidemiologists and infection preventionist members of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) Research Network.Methods:A web-based, multiple-choice survey was administered via the SHEA Research Network to 133 hospitals.Results:A total of 89 surveys were completed (67% response rate). Overall, 60% of respondents defined HOB as a positive blood culture on or after hospital day 3. Central line-associated bloodstream infections and intra-abdominal infections were perceived as the most frequent etiologies. Moreover, 61% thought that most HOB events are preventable, and 54% viewed HOB as a measure reflecting a hospital’s quality of care. Also, 29% of respondents’ hospitals already collect HOB data for internal purposes. Given a choice to publicly report central-line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) and/or HOB, 57% favored reporting either HOB alone (22%) or in addition to CLABSI (35%) and 34% favored CLABSI alone.Conclusions:Among the majority of SHEA Research Network respondents, HOB is perceived as preventable, reflective of quality of care, and potentially acceptable as a publicly reported quality metric. Further studies on HOB are needed, including validation as a quality measure, assessment of risk adjustment, and formation of evidence-based bundles and toolkits to facilitate measurement and improvement of HOB rates.

scholarly journals Characteristics of Healthcare-Associated Infections Contributing to Unexpected In-Hospital Deaths

2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 864-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Morgan ◽  
Lucia L. Lomotan ◽  
Kathleen Agnes ◽  
Linda McGrail ◽  
Mary-Claire Roghmann
Keyword(s):  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infections ◽  
Bacterial Isolates ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infection ◽  
Hospital Deaths ◽  
Healthcare Associated

We reviewed the medical records of all the patients who died in our hospital during the period from 2004 through 2008 to determine the contribution of healthcare-associated infections to mortality. Of the 179 unexpected in-hospital deaths during that period, 55 (31%) were related to 69 healthcare-associated infections. The most common healthcare-associated infection was central line-associated bloodstream infection, and the most common organisms identified were members of the Enterobacteriaceae family. Overall, 45% of bacterial isolates were multidrug resistant.

scholarly journals Comparing Hospital Healthcare-Associated Infection Incidence During Pre-COVID-19 Pandemic and Pandemic Eras

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
pp. s45-s46
Author(s):  
Andrea Parriott ◽  
N. Neely Kazerouni ◽  
Erin Epson
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Resistance ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Incomplete Data ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infection ◽  
California Department ◽  
Crude Incidence ◽  
Infection Incidence ◽  
Healthcare Associated

Background: Diversion of resources from infection prevention activities, personal protective equipment supply shortages, conservation (extended use and reuse) or overuse with multiple gown and glove layers, and antimicrobial prescribing changes during the COVID-19 pandemic might increase healthcare-associated infection (HAI) incidence and antimicrobial resistance. We compared the incidences of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), methicillin-resistant Staphyloccocus aureus bloodstream infection (MRSA BSI), and vancomycin-resistant enterococci bloodstream infection (VRE BSI) reported by California hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic with incidence data collected prior to the pandemic. Methods: Using data reported by hospitals to the California Department of Health via the NHSN, we compared incidences in the second and third quarters of 2020 (pandemic) to the second and third quarters of 2019 (before the pandemic). For CDI and MRSA BSI, we compared the standardized infection ratios (SIRs, based on the 2015 national baseline), and we calculated the P values. No adjustment model is available for VRE BSI; thus, we measured incidence via crude incidence rates (infections per 100,000 patient days). We calculated incidence rate ratio (IRR) with 95% CI for VRE BSI. To examine the possible effect of missing data during the pandemic, we performed a sensitivity analysis by excluding all facilities that had incomplete data reporting at any time during either analysis period. Results: Incidence measures and numbers of facilities contributing data in prepandemic and pandemic periods are shown in Table 1. There were no statistically significant changes in SIRs at P = .05 for either MRSA BSI or CDI between the prepandemic and pandemic periods (MRSA BSI P = .17; CDI P = .08). Crude VRE BSI incidence increased during the pandemic compared to the prepandemic period (IRR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.16–1.70). Excluding facilities with incomplete data had minimal effect. Conclusions: We found insufficient evidence that MRSA BSI or CDI incidence changed in California hospitals during the pandemic relative to the prepandemic period; however, there was a significant increase in the crude incidence of VRE BSI. Next, we will include interrupted time series analyses to assess departure from long-term trends, including a risk-adjusted model for VRE BSI. Additionally, we will evaluate for changes in central-line–associated bloodstream infection incidence and antimicrobial resistance among HAI pathogens.Funding: NoDisclosures: None

Preventing Central Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections: A Qualitative Study of Management Practices

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 557-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann Scheck McAlearney ◽  
Jennifer L. Hefner ◽  
Julie Robbins ◽  
Michael I. Harrison ◽  
Andrew Garman
Keyword(s):  
Management Practices ◽  
Management Practice ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Professional Staff ◽  
Main Theme ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infection ◽  
Program Outcomes ◽  
Administrative Leaders ◽  
Healthcare Associated

OBJECTIVETo identify factors that may explain hospital-level differences in outcomes of programs to prevent central line–associated bloodstream infections.DESIGNExtensive qualitative case study comparing higher- and lower-performing hospitals on the basis of reduction in the rate of central line–associated bloodstream infections. In-depth interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed to determine whether emergent themes differentiated higher- from lower-performing hospitals.SETTINGEight US hospitals that had participated in the federally funded On the CUSP—Stop BSI initiative.PARTICIPANTSOne hundred ninety-four interviewees including administrative leaders, clinical leaders, professional staff, and frontline physicians and nurses.RESULTSA main theme that differentiated higher- from lower-performing hospitals was a distinctive framing of the goal of “getting to zero” infections. Although all sites reported this goal, at the higher-performing sites the goal was explicitly stated, widely embraced, and aggressively pursued; in contrast, at the lower-performing hospitals the goal was more of an aspiration and not embraced as part of the strategy to prevent infections. Five additional management practices were nearly exclusively present in the higher-performing hospitals: (1) top-level commitment, (2) physician-nurse alignment, (3) systematic education, (4) meaningful use of data, and (5) rewards and recognition. We present these strategies for prevention of healthcare-associated infection as a management “bundle” with corresponding suggestions for implementation.CONCLUSIONSSome of the variance associated with CLABSI prevention program outcomes may relate to specific management practices. Adding a management practice bundle may provide critical guidance to physicians, clinical managers, and hospital leaders as they work to prevent healthcare-associated infections.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;00(0): 1–7

scholarly journals Pathogens Associated With Repeat Versus Single Central-Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections, Acute-Care Hospitals, NHSN

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s343-s344
Author(s):  
Margaret A. Dudeck ◽  
Katherine Allen-Bridson ◽  
Jonathan R. Edwards
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
National Level ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infections ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
Repeat Infection ◽  
Single Versus

Background: The NHSN is the nation’s largest surveillance system for healthcare-associated infections. Since 2011, acute-care hospitals (ACHs) have been required to report intensive care unit (ICU) central-line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) to the NHSN pursuant to CMS requirements. In 2015, this requirement included general medical, surgical, and medical-surgical wards. Also in 2015, the NHSN implemented a repeat infection timeframe (RIT) that required repeat CLABSIs, in the same patient and admission, to be excluded if onset was within 14 days. This analysis is the first at the national level to describe repeat CLABSIs. Methods: Index CLABSIs reported in ACH ICUs and select wards during 2015–2108 were included, in addition to repeat CLABSIs occurring at any location during the same period. CLABSIs were stratified into 2 groups: single and repeat CLABSIs. The repeat CLABSI group included the index CLABSI and subsequent CLABSI(s) reported for the same patient. Up to 5 CLABSIs were included for a single patient. Pathogen analyses were limited to the first pathogen reported for each CLABSI, which is considered to be the most important cause of the event. Likelihood ratio χ2 tests were used to determine differences in proportions. Results: Of the 70,214 CLABSIs reported, 5,983 (8.5%) were repeat CLABSIs. Of 3,264 nonindex CLABSIs, 425 (13%) were identified in non-ICU or non-select ward locations. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen in both the single and repeat CLABSI groups (14.2% and 12%, respectively) (Fig. 1). Compared to all other pathogens, CLABSIs reported with Candida spp were less likely in a repeat CLABSI event than in a single CLABSI event (P < .0001). Insertion-related organisms were more likely to be associated with single CLABSIs than repeat CLABSIs (P < .0001) (Fig. 2). Alternatively, Enterococcus spp or Klebsiella pneumoniae and K. oxytoca were more likely to be associated with repeat CLABSIs than single CLABSIs (P < .0001). Conclusions: This analysis highlights differences in the aggregate pathogen distributions comparing single versus repeat CLABSIs. Assessing the pathogens associated with repeat CLABSIs may offer another way to assess the success of CLABSI prevention efforts (eg, clean insertion practices). Pathogens such as Enterococcus spp and Klebsiella spp demonstrate a greater association with repeat CLABSIs. Thus, instituting prevention efforts focused on these organisms may warrant greater attention and could impact the likelihood of repeat CLABSIs. Additional analysis of patient-specific pathogens identified in the repeat CLABSI group may yield further clarification.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Healthcare-Associated Infection in Italy Annual Point-Prevalence Surveys, 2002–2004

2009 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 659-665 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Lanini ◽  
William R. Jarvis ◽  
Emanuele Nicastri ◽  
Gaetano Privitera ◽  
Giovanni Gesu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
National Health System ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Point Prevalence ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infection ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Healthcare Associated

Objective.Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. During the period from 2002 through 2004, a group of Italian hospitals was recruited to conduct HAI point-prevalence surveys.Design.Three point-prevalence surveys.Methods.A total of 9,609 patients were surveyed.Results.The overall frequency of HAI was 6.7% (645 infections among the 9,609 surveyed patients). The most frequent HAIs were lower respiratory tract infections, which accounted for 35.8% (231 of 645 HAIs) of all HAIs, followed by urinary tract infections (152 [23.6%] of 645 HAIs), bloodstream infections (90 [14.0%] of 645 HAIs), and surgical site infections (79 [12.2%] of 645 HAIs). In both multivariate and univariate analysis, invasive procedures, duration of stay, chemotherapy, trauma, coma, and the location of the hospital were all factors statistically significantly associated with the occurrence of an HAL Enterobacteriaceae were the most common isolates recovered in medical and surgical wards, whereas gram-negative aerobic bacilli were the most common isolates recovered in intensive care units. Approximately one-half of all of the patients surveyed were receiving antibiotics at the time of our study; the most used antibiotic classes were fluoroquinolones in medical wards, cephalosporins in surgical wards, and penicillins and glycopeptides in intensive care units.Conclusion.Our study emphasizes the need for implementing further HAI surveillance to provide the National Health System with proper tools to prevent and manage infection in hospitalized patients.

scholarly journals Review of Best Practices for CLABSI Prevention and the Impact of Recent Legislation on CLABSI Reporting

SAGE Open ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 215824401667774 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Woodward ◽  
Reba Umberger
Keyword(s):  
Best Practices ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Mandatory Reporting ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Common Source ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infection ◽  
Extrinsic Factors ◽  
The Impact

Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) are a very common source of healthcare-associated infection (HAI). Incidence of CLABSI has been significantly reduced through the efforts of nurses, healthcare providers, and infection preventionists. Extrinsic factors such as recently enacted legislation and mandatory reporting have not been closely examined in relation to changes in rates of HAI. The following review will examine evidence-based practices related to CLABSI and how they are reported, as well as how the Affordable Care Act, mandatory reporting, and pay-for-performance programs have affected these best practices related to CLABSI prevention. There is a disconnect in the methods and guidelines for reporting CLABSI between these programs, specifically among local monitoring agencies and the various federal oversight organizations. Future research will focus on addressing the gap in what defines a CLABSI and whether or not these programs to incentivize hospital to reduce CLABSI rates are effective.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document