scholarly journals DESIGN-FOR-COST-AND-ENVIRONMENT: ONTOLOGICAL ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF SERVICE REPRESENTATION APPROACHES

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 2197-2206
Author(s):  
M. Villanueva ◽  
B. Yannou ◽  
Y. Leroy ◽  
F. Cluzel ◽  
M. Vautier ◽  
...  

AbstractBrought by the need for competent approaches to assess the financial cost and environmental impact towards service design-for-cost-and-environment, this paper investigates on the following service representation approaches: Service Blueprinting, Process Chain Network, Business Process Model & Notation, and Customer Journey Mapping. An ontological analysis further compares their similarities and differences. Lastly, a table summarizes the findings, were further insights could be drawn to help service companies be more aware of both their spending and ecological responsibility.

Author(s):  
Isabela Cristina Teles Terra ◽  
Aline Pires Vieira De Vasconcelos ◽  
Henrique Rego Monteiro Da Hora ◽  
Milton Erthal Junior

A correta escolha de uma linguagem de modelagem de processos pode impactor positivamente uma organização. O presente trabalho apresenta a utilização do método AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) com o objetivo de auxiliar na escolha de uma linguagem de modelagem de negócios entre as seguintes alternativas: Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN), Unified Modeling Language (UML) e Event-driven Process Chain (EPC). A modelagem contemplou os critérios expressividade, legibilidade, usabilidade, atratividade, formalidade e universalidade e a consulta a um especialista que realizou os julgamentos. A linguagem de modelagem de processos BPMN foi sugerida como melhor opção pelo método AHP, superando as outras linguagens em todos os critérios analisados.


2015 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Scot Ausborn ◽  
Julia Rotondo ◽  
Tim Mulcahy

Mapping the General Social Survey to the Generic Statistical Business Process Model: NORC's Experience


2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao HE ◽  
Zhi-Yi MA ◽  
Yan ZHANG ◽  
Wei-Zhong SHAO

Processes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 1172
Author(s):  
Leonard Moser ◽  
Christina Penke ◽  
Valentin Batteiger

One of the more promising technologies for future renewable fuel production from biomass is hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL). Although enormous progress in the context of continuous experiments on demonstration plants has been made in the last years, still many research questions concerning the understanding of the HTL reaction network remain unanswered. In this study, a unique process model of an HTL process chain has been developed in Aspen Plus® for three feedstock, microalgae, sewage sludge and wheat straw. A process chain consisting of HTL, hydrotreatment (HT) and catalytic hydrothermal gasification (cHTG) build the core process steps of the model, which uses 51 model compounds representing the hydrolysis products of the different biochemical groups lipids, proteins, carbohydrates, lignin, extractives and ash for modeling the biomass. Two extensive reaction networks of 272 and 290 reactions for the HTL and HT process step, respectively, lead to the intermediate biocrude (~200 model compounds) and the final upgraded biocrude product (~130 model compounds). The model can reproduce important characteristics, such as yields, elemental analyses, boiling point distribution, product fractions, density and higher heating values of experimental results from continuous experiments as well as literature values. The model can be applied as basis for techno-economic and environmental assessments of HTL fuel production, and may be further developed into a predictive yield modeling tool.


Author(s):  
Zhyldyz Kalpeyeva ◽  
Aizhan Kassymova ◽  
Timur Umarov ◽  
Akkyz Mustafina ◽  
Nurzhan Mukazhanov

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document