Genetic Testing in Children with Epilepsy: Report of a Single-Center Experience

Author(s):  
So Lee ◽  
Natalya Karp ◽  
Eugenio Zapata-Aldana ◽  
Bekim Sadikovic ◽  
Ping Yang ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT: Background: Retrospective observational study to determine diagnostic yield and utility of genetic testing in children with epilepsy attending the Epilepsy Clinic at Children’s Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada. Methods: Children (birth–18 years) with epilepsy, who were seen in a 10-year period (January 1, 2008–March 31, 2018), were selected using defined inclusion criteria and by combining clinic datasets and laboratory records. Results: In total, 105 children (52.38% male and 47.61% female) with a variety of seizures were included in the analysis. Developmental delay was documented in the majority (83; 79.04%). Overall, a genetic diagnosis was established in 24 (22.85%) children. The diagnostic yield was highest for whole-exome sequencing (WES), at 35.71%. The yield from microarray was 8.33%. Yields of single-gene testing (18.60%) and targeted multigene panel testing (19.23%) were very similar. Several likely pathogenic and pathogenic variants not previously reported were identified and categorized using ACMG criteria. All diagnosed patients underwent a review of anti-seizure medication management and received counseling on natural history of their disease, possible complications, recurrence risks, and possibilities of preimplantation or prenatal genetic diagnosis. Conclusions: Our study confirms the multiple benefits of detecting a genetic etiology in children with epilepsy. Similar yields in single versus multigene testing underscore the importance of accurate clinical phenotyping. Patients with epilepsy and their caregivers in Ontario would undoubtedly benefit from repatriation of multigene panels and WES to the province.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 668-668
Author(s):  
Shirley A Yao ◽  
Elizabeth A Wiley ◽  
Lisa R. Susswein ◽  
Megan L. Marshall ◽  
Natalie J. Carter ◽  
...  

668 Background: Approximately 25% of pheochromocytomas (PCC) have a hereditary basis, and germline variants in the SDHA, SDHB, SDHC, SDHD, SDHAF2, TMEM127, MAX, VHL, FH, RET, MEN1, and NF1 genes have been associated with a predisposition to PCC and paraganglioma (PGL). Multi-gene hereditary cancer panel testing for PCC has become increasingly more common than single-gene testing algorithms. Identification of a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant (PV/LPV) in one of these genes has important implications for surveillance in patients and their family members. Here we describe the spectrum of PV/LPV variants identified in individuals with PCC. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of clinical and molecular data for all individuals diagnosed with PCC who underwent panel testing through BioReference Laboratories that included at least SDHA, SDHB, SDHC, SDHD, SDHAF2, TMEM127, MAX, VHL, FH, RET, MEN1, and NF1 between January 2016 and February 2017. Results: Seventy-nine individuals underwent testing due to a personal (n = 76) or family (n = 3) history of PCC. The positive yield was 14% (11/79). The majority of PV/LPV were in SDHB (n = 4; 36%), followed by RET (n = 2, 18%), with the remaining variants being identified in SDHA (1), SDHC (1), VHL (1), TMEM127 (1), and MAX (1). Approximately half (6/11) of those with a PV/LPV had a non-syndromic presentation of a unilateral PCC with no reported family history of PCC or PGL. The average age at tumor diagnosis was lower for probands testing positive than those without PV/LPV (34y±14 vs 44y±16). Conclusions: Our data support previous recommendations that patients with apparently sporadic, non-syndromic PCC be considered for genetic testing. Panel testing is a useful tool for identifying individuals with hereditary PCC.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 16-16
Author(s):  
Nimmi S. Kapoor ◽  
Lisa D. Curcio ◽  
Carlee A. Blakemore ◽  
Amy K. Bremner ◽  
Rachel E. McFarland ◽  
...  

16 Background: Recently introduced multi-gene panel testing including BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes (BRCA1/2) for hereditary cancer risk has raised concerns with the ability to detect all deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations compared to older methods of sequentially testing BRCA1/2 separately. The purpose of this study is to evaluate rates of pathogenic BRCA1/2mutations and variants of uncertain significance (VUS) between previous restricted algorithms of genetic testing and newer approaches of multi-gene testing. Methods: Data was collected retrospectively from 966 patients who underwent genetic testing at one of three sites from a single institution. Test results were compared between patients who underwent BRCA1/2testing only (limited group, n = 629) to those who underwent multi-gene testing with 5-43 cancer-related genes (panel group, n = 337). Results: Deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations were identified in 37 patients, with equivalent rates between limited and panel groups (4.0% vs 3.6%, respectively, p = 0.86). Thirty-nine patients had a BRCA1/2 VUS, with similar rates between limited and panel groups (4.5% vs 3.3%, respectively, p = 0.49). On multivariate analysis, there was no difference in detection of either BRCA1/2 mutations or VUS between both groups. Of patients undergoing panel testing, an additional 3.9% (n = 13) had non-BRCA pathogenic mutations and 13.4% (n = 45) had non-BRCA VUSs. Mutations in PALB2, CHEK2, and ATM were the most common non-BRCA mutations identified. Conclusions: Multi-gene panel testing detects pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations at equivalent rates as limited testing and increases the diagnostic yield. Panel testing increases the VUS rate, mainly due to non-BRCA genes. Patients at risk for hereditary breast cancer can safely benefit from upfront, more efficient, multi-gene panel testing.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1533-1533
Author(s):  
Jessica Fields ◽  
Dimitrios Nasioudis ◽  
Zhen Ni Zhou ◽  
Ann Carlson ◽  
Melissa Kristen Frey ◽  
...  

1533 Background: Approximately one in forty Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) individuals carry a BRCA1/2 mutation and genetic screening in this population has largely focused on these two genes. With the recent rapid uptake of multigene panel testing for cancer genetic assessment, we sought to explore multigene panels in our cohort which is comprised of AJ and non-AJ patients. Methods: The results of all patients with known ancestry who underwent genetic testing and counseling at the hereditary breast and ovarian cancer center at a single institution between 7/1/2013-12/31/2016 were reviewed. Results: One thousand six hundred and fifty patients with known ancestry underwent genetic testing over the study period, including 681 AJ patients. The median age was 49 (range 20-86). AJ patients were more likely to undergo targeted testing than non-AJ patients (74% vs. 61 %, P<0.001). The use of multigene panels in AJ patients increased over time (2013 – 3.2%, 2014 – 18.7%, 2015 – 27.4%, 2016 – 48.4%, P<0.001). Mutations were more common in AJ patients (75, 11% vs. 66, 7%, P=0.003). Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) were less common in AJ patients (40, 6% vs. 124, 13%, P<0.001), even when excluding patients with single gene testing (32, 19% vs. 98, 27%, P=0.05). Among all patients, mutations in BRCA1/2 were most common (75%). The majority (69%) of non- BRCA1/2 mutations were identified on multigene panels. Rates of mutations in non- BRCA1/2 genes were the same among AJ and non-AJ patients (16, 21% vs. 20, 30%, P=0.3, Table 1). Conclusions: AJ patients have equivalent rates of non- BRCA1/2 mutations and on multigene panels have lower rates of VUS compared to non-AJ patients. However, the majority of AJ patients underwent targeted gene testing. These findings suggest consideration of a change in paradigm for genetic assessment of AJ patients with a focus on BRCA and non- BRCAassociated cancer genes through multigene panel testing. [Table: see text]


Kidney360 ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 10.34067/KID.0002272020
Author(s):  
Nasim Bekheirnia ◽  
Kevin E. Glinton ◽  
Linda Rossetti ◽  
Joshua Manor ◽  
Wuyan Chen ◽  
...  

Background: As genetic testing increasingly integrates into the practice of nephrology, our understanding of the basis of many kidney disorders has exponentially increased. Given this, we recently initiated a Renal Genetics Clinic (RGC) at our large, urban children's hospital for patients with kidney disorders. Methods: Genetic testing was performed in Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) certified laboratories using single gene testing, multi-gene panels, chromosomal microarray (CMA), or exome sequencing (ES). Results: A total of 192 patients were evaluated in this clinic, with cystic kidney disease (49/192) being the most common reason for referral followed by Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney and Urinary Tract (CAKUT: 41/192) and hematuria (38/192). Genetic testing was performed for 158 patients with an overall diagnostic yield of 81/158 (51.3%). In the patients who reached a genetic diagnosis, 16/81 (19.7%), medical or surgical treatment of the patients were impacted, and in 12/81 (14.8%), previous clinical diagnoses were changed to more accurate genetic diagnoses. Conclusions: Such testing provided an accurate diagnosis for children and in some cases led to further diagnosis in seemingly asymptomatic family members and changes to overall medical management. Genetic testing, as facilitated by such a specialized clinical setting, thus appears to have clear utility in the diagnosis and counseling of patients with a wide range of kidney manifestations.


2022 ◽  
Vol 108 (01) ◽  
pp. 11-16
Author(s):  
Hákon Björn Högnason ◽  
◽  
Vigdís Fjóla Stefánsdóttir ◽  
Eirný Þöll Þórólfsdóttir ◽  
Jón Jóhannes Jónsson ◽  
...  

INTRODUCTION: A genetic counselling unit at Landspitali hospital (LSH) was established in 2006. Meanwhile, genetic testing has become an integral part of general health care. In this article we detail the outcome of genetic testing at the Department of Genetic and Molecular Medicine (DGM) at Landspitali over a five year period (2012-2017). Factors that were analyzed for the time period were: Number of patients, reason for referral, reason for genetic testing without genetic counselling and yield (proportion of positive tests) of genetic testing. METHODS: Data was analysed from two medical record databases, Shire and Saga, used by the DGM in the time period. RESULTS: The number of individuals coming for genetic counselling increased every year over the time period. Reasons for referral were cancer-related in two-thirds of cases. Other reasons for referral included various other familial disorders. Most common were autosomal dominant disorders like myotonic dystrophy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and autosomal recessive disorders like spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and GM1-gangliosidosis. Most common reasons for genetic testing outside of the LSH GC unit was because of managable diseases like hemochromatosis and F5/Prothrombin-related thrombophilia. Yield of genetic testing was assessed for a) known mutation testing / carrier testing, b) single gene testing, c) gene panel testing and d) whole genome and whole exome sequencing. Known mutation testing was positive in 33% of cases and single gene testing in 46% of cases. The yield of gene panel testing for cancer was found to be lower (20%) than gene panel testing for other disorders (40%). The yield of whole exome and whole genome sequencing was 46%.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mev Dominguez-Valentin ◽  
Sigve Nakken ◽  
Hélène Tubeuf ◽  
Daniel Vodak ◽  
Per Olaf Ekstrøm ◽  
...  

AbstractWe have surveyed 191 prospectively sampled familial cancer patients with no previously detected pathogenic variant in the BRCA1/2, PTEN, TP53 or DNA mismatch repair genes. In all, 138 breast cancer (BC) cases, 34 colorectal cancer (CRC) and 19 multiple early-onset cancers were included. A panel of 44 cancer-predisposing genes identified 5% (9/191) pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants and 87 variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were identified mostly in familial BC individuals (7/9) and were located in 5 genes: ATM (3), BRCA2 (1), CHEK2 (1), MSH6 (1) and MUTYH (1), followed by multiple early-onset (2/9) individuals, affecting the CHEK2 and ATM genes. Eleven of the 87 VUS were tested, and 4/11 were found to have an impact on splicing by using a minigene splicing assay. We here report for the first time the splicing anomalies using this assay for the variants ATM c.3806A > G and BUB1 c.677C > T, whereas CHEK1 c.61G > A did not result in any detectable splicing anomaly. Our study confirms the presence of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in genes that are not routinely tested in the context of the above-mentioned clinical phenotypes. Interestingly, more than half of the pathogenic germline variants were found in the moderately penetrant ATM and CHEK2 genes, where only truncating variants from these genes are recommended to be reported in clinical genetic testing practice.


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Becherucci ◽  
Viviana Palazzo ◽  
Luigi Cirillo ◽  
Benedetta Mazzinghi ◽  
Samuela Landini ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aims Bartter (BS) and Gitelman syndrome (GS) are autosomal recessive rare inherited disorders characterized by hypokalemic metabolic alkalosis and secondary hyperaldosteronism. The primary defect is a genetically determined impairment of sodium chloride reabsorption in the renal tubule, thus resulting in salt loss, dehydration and acid-base homeostasis perturbations. Although the diagnosis can be suspected based on presenting features, the clinical diagnosis of BS and GS can be challenging, as they are rare and phenotypically overlapping. As a consequence, the current clinical classification lacks of specificity and genetic testing represents the gold standard for the diagnosis. Driven by the rapidly decreasing costs and turn-around time, next-generation sequencing technologies are increasingly utilized in diagnostics and research of inherited tubulopathies, including BS and GS. Recently, sequencing of selected gene panels provided the advantage of achieving high coverage of genes of interest at lower costs, providing high diagnostic yield and new insights into the phenotypic spectrum of these rare disorders. However, whole-exome (WES) is not routinely performed for the molecular diagnosis of BS and GS. The aim of our study was to assess the diagnostic performance of WES in BS and GS and to establish genotype-phenotype correlations. Method We performed WES in all consecutive patients referred for genetic testing with a clinical suspect of BS or GS. Variant prioritization was carried out according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines (ACMG). Parents and first-degree relatives were included, whenever available. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were collected retrospectively, in order to establish genotype-phenotype correlations. Results We enrolled 50 patients (22 males, 46 Caucasians) with a clinical diagnosis of BS (19), GS (24) or BS/GS (7). All the patients showed hypokalemic metabolic alkalosis at onset (serum bicarbonate=29.5 mEq/l ± 4.4, potassium= 2.7 mEq/l ± 0.6). The median age at clinical diagnosis was 7 years (range 0-67 years). Three patients had familial history of tubulopathies. WES showed pathogenic variants in 42/50 patients (84%), thus establishing a conclusive diagnosis. Interestingly, a dedicated analytic pipeline allowed us to identify copy number variations (CNVs) in 7/42 patients with a confirmed genetic diagnosis. In detail, WES allowed us to confirm the clinical diagnosis in 33/50 patients, with an improvement in classification in at least 14 cases (i.e. subtype I-V of BS). In 9 additional patients, genetic testing changed the clinical diagnosis: 6 patients with a clinical of BS turned out to have pathogenic variants in SLC12A3, resulting in GS; in 3 patients, genetic testing revised the clinical diagnosis indicating inherited disorders outside the BS/GS spectrum (HELIX syndrome, Primary familial hypoparatiroidism, Type 2 renal hypomagnesemia). Only 38% of patients with a genetic diagnosis of BS showed nephrocalcinosis. Strikingly, this was present in 8% of patients with GS. On the other hand, hypomagnesemia, a distinctive feature of GS, was similarly distributed among BS and GS patients (45% vs. 68%, respectively). Finally, although patients with GS showed a median age at onset higher than patients with BS, some overlap did exist, making differential diagnosis challenging at single-patient level. Conclusion The results of our study demonstrate that WES ensures a high diagnostic yield (84%) in patients with a clinical diagnosis of BS or GS, especially if coupled with analysis of CNVs. This approach showed to be useful in dealing with the phenotypic heterogeneity typical of these rare disorders, improving differential diagnosis by detecting phenocopies also outside the BS/GS spectrum, enabling additional specific work-up, genetic counseling, and screening of at-risk relatives.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elke M. van Veen ◽  
D. Gareth Evans ◽  
Elaine F. Harkness ◽  
Helen J. Byers ◽  
Jamie M. Ellingford ◽  
...  

AbstractPurpose: Lobular breast cancer (LBC) accounts for ~ 15% of breast cancer. Here, we studied the frequency of pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) in an extended panel of genes in women affected with LBC. Methods: 302 women with LBC and 1567 without breast cancer were tested for BRCA1/2 PGVs. A subset of 134 LBC affected women who tested negative for BRCA1/2 PGVs underwent extended screening, including: ATM, CDH1, CHEK2, NBN, PALB2, PTEN, RAD50, RAD51D, and TP53.Results: 35 PGVs were identified in the group with LBC, of which 22 were in BRCA1/2. Ten actionable PGVs were identified in additional genes (ATM(4), CDH1(1), CHEK2(1), PALB2(2) and TP53(2)). Overall, PGVs in three genes conferred a significant increased risk for LBC. Odds ratios (ORs) were: BRCA1: OR = 13.17 (95%CI 2.83–66.38; P = 0.0017), BRCA2: OR = 10.33 (95%CI 4.58–23.95; P < 0.0001); and ATM: OR = 8.01 (95%CI 2.52–29.92; P = 0.0053). We did not detect an increased risk of LBC for PALB2, CDH1 or CHEK2. Conclusion: The overall PGV detection rate was 11.59%, with similar rates of BRCA1/2 (7.28%) PGVs as for other actionable PGVs (7.46%), indicating a benefit for extended panel genetic testing in LBC. We also report a previously unrecognised association of pathogenic variants in ATM with LBC.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina E. Hoei-Hansen ◽  
Marie L. B. Tygesen ◽  
Morten Dunø ◽  
John Vissing ◽  
Martin Ballegaard ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim The diagnostic workup in patients with delayed motor milestones suspected of having either myopathy or a congenital myasthenic syndrome is complex. Our hypothesis was that performance of a muscle biopsy and neurophysiology including stimulated single-fiber electromyography during an anesthetic procedure, combined with genetic testing has a high diagnostic quality. Materials and Methods Clinical and paraclinical data were retrospectively collected from 24 patients aged from 1 month to 10 years (median: 5.2 years). Results Neurophysiology examination was performed in all patients and was abnormal in 11 of 24. No patients had findings suggestive of a myasthenic syndrome. Muscle biopsy was performed in 21 of 24 and was normal in 16. Diagnostic findings included nemaline rods, inclusion bodies, fiber size variability, and type-II fiber atrophy. Genetic testing with either a gene panel or exome sequencing was performed in 18 of 24 patients, with pathogenic variants detected in ACTA1, NEB, SELENON, GRIN2B, SCN8A, and COMP genes. Conclusion Results supporting a neuromuscular abnormality were found in 15 of 24. In six patients (25%), we confirmed a genetic diagnosis and 12 had a clinical neuromuscular diagnosis. The study suggests that combined use of neurophysiology and muscle biopsy in cases where genetic testing does not provide a diagnosis can be useful in children with delayed motor milestones and clinical evidence of a neuromuscular disease.


Heart ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. heartjnl-2020-316798
Author(s):  
Monica Ahluwalia ◽  
Carolyn Y Ho

Genetic testing in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a valuable tool to manage patients and their families. Genetic testing can help inform diagnosis and differentiate HCM from other disorders that also result in increased left ventricular wall thickness, thereby directly impacting treatment. Moreover, genetic testing can definitively identify at-risk relatives and focus family management. Pathogenic variants in sarcomere and sarcomere-related genes have been implicated in causing HCM, and targeted gene panel testing is recommended for patients once a clinical diagnosis has been established. If a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant is identified in a patient with HCM, predictive genetic testing is recommended for their at-risk relatives to determine who is at risk and to guide longitudinal screening and risk stratification. However, there are important challenges and considerations to implementing genetic testing in clinical practice. Genetic testing results can have psychological and other implications for patients and their families, emphasising the importance of genetic counselling before and after genetic testing. Determining the clinical relevance of genetic testing results is also complex and requires expertise in understanding of human genetic variation and clinical manifestations of the disease. In this review, we discuss the genetics of HCM and how to integrate genetic testing in clinical practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document