scholarly journals P152: Point of care biliary ultrasound in the emergency department (BUSED): implications for surgical referral and emergency department wait times

CJEM ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (S1) ◽  
pp. S111-S111
Author(s):  
F. Myslik ◽  
J. Vandelinde ◽  
R. Leeper ◽  
R. Hilsden ◽  
D. Thompson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Wall Thickness ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Bladder Wall ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Biliary Disease ◽  
Gall Stones ◽  
Biliary Ultrasound

Introduction: Patients with uncomplicated biliary disease frequently present to the emergency department for assessment. To improve bedside clinical decision making many emergency medicine physicians have pursued specialized training to perform point of care biliary ultrasound in the emergency department (BUSED). The purpose of this study was to determine the usefulness of BUSED in predicting the need for surgical consultation and intervention for biliary disease. Methods: A retrospective study of 283 consecutive patients visiting the emergency department who received a BUSED scan from December 1, 2016 to July 16, 2017. Physician interpretations of the BUSED scans were collected from the electronic image storage and interpretation system. Additional data was collected from the electronic health record including lab values, the subsequent use of diagnostic imaging, and outcomes data including disposition, surgical consultation or intervention, and 28 day follow up for representation or complication. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were performed. Results: Of the patients who received a biliary POCUS scan, 29% were referred to general surgery, and 43% of those referred proceeded to eventual cholecystectomy. Factors found to be independently predictive of surgical intervention on point of care BUSED scans included presence of gall stones (OR 13.01, 95%CI 5.02 to 27.1) and increased gallbladder wall thickness (OR 6.01, 95%CI 1.7 to 11.1). A total of 30% of patients receiving BUSED required at least one additional, radiology based imaging test (CT or diagnostic US). Average emergency department length of stay was substantially longer for those who required additional imaging as compared to those who were able to be diagnosed by BUSED alone (16.1 versus 5.2 hours, 10.9 hours 95%CI 10.6 11.2, p<0.05) . Conclusion: Point of care biliary ultrasound performed by emergency physicians provides timely access to diagnostic information. Positive findings of gall stones and increased gall bladder wall thickness are highly predictive of the need for surgical intervention. Future, prospective studies are warranted to determine if point of care sonography is sufficient to proceed to surgery in select cases of uncomplicated biliary disease.

scholarly journals FUTURES: Forecasting the Unexpected Transfer to Upgraded Resources in Sepsis

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 187-191
Author(s):  
Alexa Profozich ◽  
Trevor Sytsma ◽  
Ryan Arnold ◽  
Kristen Miller ◽  
Muge Capan
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Initial Point ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Sepsis Management ◽  
Insight Into

Sepsis is one of the most deadly and costly diseases. The Emergency Department (ED) is the initial point of care for most patients who become hospitalized due to sepsis. Quantifying the accuracy of ED clinician forecasting regarding patients’ clinical trajectories and outcomes can provide insight into clinical decision making and inform sepsis management.

scholarly journals Impact of point-of-care ultrasound on clinical decision-making at an urban emergency department in Tanzania

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. e0194774 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teri Ann Reynolds ◽  
Stas Amato ◽  
Irene Kulola ◽  
Chuan-Jay Jeffrey Chen ◽  
Juma Mfinanga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Urban Emergency Department

POCT errors can lead to false potassium results

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Buño ◽  
Paloma Oliver
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Clinical Intervention ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Whole Process ◽  
Severe Hyperkalemia ◽  
Wrong Diagnosis ◽  
Critical Patients

Abstract Point-of-care-testing (POCT) facilitates rapid availability of results that allows prompt clinical decision making. These results must be reliable and the whole process must not compromise its quality. Blood gas analyzers are one of the most used methods for POCT tests in Emergency Departments (ED) and in critical patients. Whole blood is the preferred sample, and we must be aware that hemolysis can occur. These devices cannot detect the presence of hemolysis in the sample, and because of the characteristics of the sample, we cannot visually detect it either. Hemolysis can alter the result of different parameters, including potassium with abnormal high results or masking low levels (hypokalemia) when reporting normal concentrations. Severe hyperkalemia is associated with the risk of potentially fatal cardiac arrhythmia and demands emergency clinical intervention. Hemolysis can be considered the most frequent cause of pseudohyperkalemia (spurious hyperkalemia) or pseudonormokalemia and can be accompanied by a wrong diagnosis and an ensuing inappropriate clinical decision making. A complete review of the potential causes of falsely elevated potassium concentrations in blood is presented in this article. POCT programs properly led and organized by the clinical laboratory can help to prevent errors and their impact on patient care.

scholarly journals Point-of-Care Testing-the Key in the Battle against SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic

Micromachines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 1464
Author(s):  
Florina Silvia Iliescu ◽  
Ana Maria Ionescu ◽  
Larisa Gogianu ◽  
Monica Simion ◽  
Violeta Dediu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Diagnostic Testing ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Rapid Screening ◽  
Diagnostic Tools ◽  
Point Of Care Testing ◽  
Qrt Pcr ◽  
User Friendly

The deleterious effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic urged the development of diagnostic tools to manage the spread of disease. Currently, the “gold standard” involves the use of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Even though it is sensitive, specific and applicable for large batches of samples, qRT-PCR is labour-intensive, time-consuming, requires trained personnel and is not available in remote settings. This review summarizes and compares the available strategies for COVID-19: serological testing, Point-of-Care Testing, nanotechnology-based approaches and biosensors. Last but not least, we address the advantages and limitations of these methods as well as perspectives in COVID-19 diagnostics. The effort is constantly focused on understanding the quickly changing landscape of available diagnostic testing of COVID-19 at the clinical levels and introducing reliable and rapid screening point of care testing. The last approach is key to aid the clinical decision-making process for infection control, enhancing an appropriate treatment strategy and prompt isolation of asymptomatic/mild cases. As a viable alternative, Point-of-Care Testing (POCT) is typically low-cost and user-friendly, hence harbouring tremendous potential for rapid COVID-19 diagnosis.

scholarly journals Clinical decision making in the emergency department setting using rapid PCR: Results of the CLADE study group

2018 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
pp. 42-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glen T. Hansen ◽  
Johanna Moore ◽  
Emily Herding ◽  
Tami Gooch ◽  
Diane Hirigoyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Rapid Pcr ◽  
Emergency Department Setting

Point of Care Ultrasound in Geriatric Patients: Prospective Evaluation of a Portable Handheld Ultrasound Device

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (03) ◽  
pp. 308-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eckhart Fröhlich ◽  
Katharina Beller ◽  
Reinhold Muller ◽  
Maria Herrmann ◽  
Ines Debove ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Geriatric Patients ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Handheld Device ◽  
Ultrasound Device ◽  
Handheld Ultrasound

Abstract Purpose The aim of the current study was to evaluate point of care ultrasound (POCUS) in geriatric patients by echoscopy using a handheld ultrasound device (HHUSD, VScan) at bedside in comparison to a high-end ultrasound system (HEUS) as the gold standard. Materials and Methods Prospective observational study with a total of 112 geriatric patients. The ultrasound examinations were independently performed by two experienced blinded examiners with a portable handheld device and a high-end ultrasound device. The findings were compared with respect to diagnostic findings and therapeutic implications. Results The main indications for the ultrasound examinations were dyspnea (44.6 %), fall (frailty) (24.1 %) and fever (21.4 %). The most frequently found diagnoses were cystic lesions 32.1 % (35/109), hepatic vein congestion 19.3 % (21/109) and ascites 13.6 % (15/110). HHUSD delivered 13 false-negative findings in the abdomen resulting in an “overall sensitivity” of 89.5 %. The respective “overall specificity” was 99.6 % (7 false-positive diagnoses). HHUSD (versus HEUS data) resulted in 13.6 % (17.3 %) diagnostically relevant procedures in the abdomen and 0.9 % (0.9 %) in the thorax. Without HHUSD (HEUS) 95.7 % (100 %) of important pathological findings would have been missed. Conclusion The small HHUSD tool improves clinical decision-making in immobile geriatric patients at the point of care (geriatric ward). In most cases, HHUSD allows sufficiently accurate yes/no diagnoses already at the bedside, thereby clarifying the leading symptoms for early clinical decision-making.

scholarly journals Early Multi-organ Point-of-Care Ultrasound Evaluation of Respiratory Distress During SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak: Case Report

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Farrow ◽  
Graham Becherer-Bailey ◽  
Daniel Mantuani ◽  
Arun Nagdev
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Lung Ultrasound ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Disease Process ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Care Assessment

Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by the virus known as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Several case series from Italy and China have highlighted the lung ultrasound findings of this disease process and may demonstrate its clinical utility during the current pandemic. Case Report: We present a case of a COVID-19 patient who presented to the emergency department twice within a 24-hour period with rapidly progressing illness. A multi-organ point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) evaluation was used on the return visit and assisted clinical decision-making. Discussion: A multi-organ POCUS exam allows for quick assessment of acute dyspnea in the emergency department. As the lung involvement of COVID-19 is primarily a peripheral process it is readily identifiable via lung ultrasound. We believe that when applied efficiently and safely a POCUS exam can reduce clinical uncertainty and potentially limit the use of other imaging modalities when treating patients with COVID-19. Conclusion: This case highlights the utility of an early multiorgan point-of-care assessment for patients presenting with moderate respiratory distress during the severe SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

scholarly journals Factors affecting clinical decision-making in inflammatory bowel disease and the role of point-of-care calprotectin

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 1756283X1774473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yannick Derwa ◽  
Christopher J.M. Williams ◽  
Ruchit Sood ◽  
Saqib Mumtaz ◽  
M. Hassan Bholah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Medical Therapy ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Mucosal Inflammation ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Objectives: Patient-reported symptoms correlate poorly with mucosal inflammation. Clinical decision-making may, therefore, not be based on objective evidence of disease activity. We conducted a study to determine factors associated with clinical decision-making in a secondary care inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) population, using a cross-sectional design. Methods: Decisions to request investigations or escalate medical therapy were recorded from outpatient clinic encounters in a cohort of 276 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn’s disease (CD). Disease activity was assessed using clinical indices, self-reported flare and faecal calprotectin ≥ 250 µg/g. Demographic, disease-related and psychological factors were assessed using validated questionnaires. Logistic regression was performed to determine the association between clinical decision-making and symptoms, mucosal inflammation and psychological comorbidity. Results: Self-reported flare was associated with requesting investigations in CD [odds ratio (OR) 5.57; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.84–17.0] and UC (OR 10.8; 95% CI 1.8–64.3), but mucosal inflammation was not (OR 1.62; 95% CI 0.49–5.39; and OR 0.21; 95% CI 0.21–1.05, respectively). Self-reported flare (OR 7.96; 95% CI 1.84–34.4), but not mucosal inflammation (OR 1.67; 95% CI 0.46–6.13) in CD, and clinical disease activity (OR 10.36; 95% CI 2.47–43.5) and mucosal inflammation (OR 4.26; 95% CI 1.28–14.2) in UC were associated with escalation of medical therapy. Almost 60% of patients referred for investigation had no evidence of mucosal inflammation. Conclusions: Apart from escalation of medical therapy in UC, clinical decision-making was not associated with mucosal inflammation in IBD. The use of point-of-care calprotectin testing may aid clinical decision-making, improve resource allocation and reduce costs in IBD.

scholarly journals What is the role of technology in improving patient safety? A French, German and UK healthcare professional perspective

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 219-224
Author(s):  
Alain Astier ◽  
Jean Carlet ◽  
Torsten Hoppe-Tichy ◽  
Ann Jacklin ◽  
Annette Jeanes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Working Group ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Cultural Changes ◽  
Use Of Technology ◽  
Patient Pathways ◽  
Professional Perspective ◽  
Enhance Patient Safety

Patient safety in hospitals can be compromised by preventable adverse events (AE). Among the preventable AEs, hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) are one of the most burdensome, contributing to not only poorer patient outcomes but institutional burden through direct financial losses and increased patient length of stay.  Technological innovations can enhance patient safety by automating tasks, introducing medication alerts, clinical reminders, improved diagnostic and consultation reports, facilitating information sharing, improving clinical decision-making, intercepting potential errors, reducing variation in practice, and managing workforce shortages as well as making complete patient data available.  A multidisciplinary working group from three European countries was convened to discuss how to optimise the use of technology to reduce preventable AEs in acute care hospitals. The working group identified examples where they felt there were opportunities to streamline patient pathways, including antimicrobial stewardship, point of care testing, microbiology test reporting to streamline time from sample-taking to clinical decision and mobile automated dispensing systems, which can reduce the burden on overworked staff. The working group also discussed key factors that were critical to ensuring different stakeholders, both within and outside the hospital, could meaningfully contribute to improving patient safety. They agreed that technological approaches and advances would have limited impact without meaningful cultural changes at all levels of healthcare infrastructure to implement the benefits offered by current or future technologies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document