Monacan Millennium: A Collaborative Archaeology and History of a Virginia Indian People. JEFFREY L. HANTMAN. 2018. University of Virginia Press, Charlottesville. xiii + 217 pp. $29.50 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-8139-4147-9.

2020 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 611-612
Author(s):  
Patricia E. Rubertone
1901 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 461-473
Author(s):  
C. F. Oldham

It is well known that between the Vedic period, and that described in the epic poems, great modifications occurred in the religion and social customs of the Indian people. Since the Epic period, further changes have taken place; so that the orthodox Hinduism, of the present day, differs much from that represented in the Mahābhārata. Religious vicissitudes have also occurred outside the Brahmanic pale. The Buddhist religion has become extinguished in India. Vast numbers of the people, too, have been converted—many of them forcibly—to the faith of Islām. Notwithstanding all this, however, many of the old deities still live. The Nāga rajas are worshipped as demigods; the sun, the cedar, and the serpent are held sacred; and Indra and his Devas have still their worshippers and their temples, as they had in the days described in the Mahābharāta.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 213-220
Author(s):  
Umida Kuranbaeva ◽  

This article is devoted to the history, unique culture and traditions of the Indian people, described in the writings of Abu Rayhan Biruni “Athar al-Baqiyah”, “Tafhim” and “India”, which are the primary sources on the history of India. It analyzes and classifies information that is collected from scientific literature on the works of Abu Rayhan Biruni. To date, the works of Abu Rayhan Beruni on the history, ethnography, chronology, toponymy, calendars, holidays and religious events of the above-mentioned peoples occupy one of the main places in research works.


2019 ◽  
Vol 114 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
NAZMUL S. SULTAN

This article theorizes the colonial problem of peoplehood that Indian anticolonial thinkers grappled with in their attempts to conceptualize self-rule, or swaraj. British colonial rule drew its legitimacy from a developmentalist conception of the colonized people as backward and disunited. The discourse of “underdeveloped” colonial peoplehood rendered the Indian people “unfit” for self-government, suspending their sovereignty to an indefinite future. The concept of swaraj would be born with the rejection of deferred colonial self-government. Yet the persistence of the developmentalist figuration of the people generated a crisis of sovereign authorization. The pre-Gandhian swaraj theorists would be faced with the not-yet claimable figure of the people at the very moment of disavowing the British claim to rule. Recovering this underappreciated pre-Gandhian history of the concept of swaraj and reinterpreting its Gandhian moment, this article offers a new reading of Gandhi's theory of moral self-rule. In so doing, it demonstrates how the history of swaraj helps trace the colonial career of popular sovereignty.


1947 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 447-447
Author(s):  
F. Noyce
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document