The politics of intellectual property rights regimes: An empirical study of new technology use in entrepreneurship

Technovation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (12) ◽  
pp. 807-816 ◽  
Author(s):  
André O. Laplume ◽  
Saurav Pathak ◽  
Emanuel Xavier-Oliveira
Author(s):  
Julio César Acosta Prado ◽  
Carlos Sanchís Pedregosa ◽  
Oscar Hernán López Montoya ◽  
Néstor Juan Sanabria Landazábal ◽  
Arnold Alejandro Tafur Mendoza

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Bradford Biddle

An empirical study which identifies 251 technical interoperability standards implemented in a modern laptop computer, and estimates that the total number of standards relevant to such a device is much higher. Of the identified standards, the authors find that 44% were developed by consortia, 36% by formal standards development organizations, and 20% by single companies. The intellectual property rights policies associated with 197 of the standards are assessed: 75% were developed under “RAND” terms, 22% under “royalty free” terms, and 3% utilize a patent pool. The authors make certain observations based on their findings, and identify promising areas for future research.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-22
Author(s):  
Wang Ching-Yung

Any powerful treatise comes from qualified enough evidence in Scientific Century 21th. Empirical research can supplement that lack of sufficient evidence to build stronger. There are many topics to discuss how important IPRs (Intellectual Property Rights) or ICs (Intellectual Property Rights Capital) are, but lack of advanced analysis for how separate countable IPRs affect SMEs in detail. We utilize 800 enterprises, which have a real trading record with company A from 1991 to 2017 and have paid tax to government, to analyze above problem through correlations, hypothesis and regression methods. The goal of this research is to supplement existing shortage evidence in details not to argue any questions for any researcher. We hope the outcome of this research can be a worthful and a better reference or guidance for those SMEs, or entrepreneurs, or managers, or government…etc. in the future. We know that power of life comes from the condition of Survival, at the same time, all continuous contribution of SMEs come from the condition of SMEs Survival, too. Here, the major goals of this study are how separate countable IPRs affects the condition of SMEs Survival to support those propositions, what emphasize the importance of IPRs. Finally, we suggest a guideline of IPRs investment priority sequence for those leaders or owners of entrepreneurs, SMEs…etc., who plan to make IPRs investment strategy decision.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 216
Author(s):  
Julio César Acosta Prado ◽  
Carlos Sanchís Pedregosa ◽  
Oscar Hernán López Montoya ◽  
Néstor Juan Sanabria Landazábal ◽  
Arnold Alejandro Tafur Mendoza

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document