Molecular identification and genetic analysis for 24 turf-type Cynodon cultivars by Sequence-Related Amplified Polymorphism markers

2009 ◽  
Vol 122 (3) ◽  
pp. 461-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiyong Wang ◽  
Xuejun Yuan ◽  
Yiqi Zheng ◽  
Jianxiu Liu
2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Endang Warih Minarni ◽  
Loekas Soesanto ◽  
Agus Suyanto ◽  
Rostaman

Abstract Background Brown plant hopper (Nilaparvata lugens Stal.) a very damaging pest to rice crops. One of the efforts to control it is the use of entomopathogenic fungi (EPF). Three fungal local isolates found in Indonesia were effective in controlling the brown plant hopper pest. This study aimed to molecularly identify the 3 fungal isolates. Molecular identification is very important to get the exact identity of these fungi. The accuracy of EPF identification will greatly determine the success of control. Molecular identification is based on a partial genetic analysis of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) locus of ribosomal fungal DNA. Result Morphology of the local isolates named J22 and J60 were identified as Paecilomyces sp., while the isolate J34 was identified as Beauveria sp. The results of molecular identification of the isolates J22 and J60 were identified as the fungi Lecanicillium saksenae and Simplicillium sp., while isolate J34 was identified as Myrothecium sp. The results of literature search showed that the 3 fungi have never been previously reported to infect the brown plant hopper. Conclusion In Indonesia, 3 types of EPF, namely L. saksenae, Simplicillium sp., and Myrothecium sp., were found having the potential to control the brown plant hopper pest.


Author(s):  
S. E. Miller

The techniques for detecting viruses are many and varied including FAT, ELISA, SPIRA, RPHA, SRH, TIA, ID, IEOP, GC (1); CF, CIE (2); Tzanck (3); EM, IEM (4); and molecular identification (5). This paper will deal with viral diagnosis by electron microscopy and will be organized from the point of view of the electron microscopist who is asked to look for an unknown agent--a consideration of the specimen and possible agents rather than from a virologist's view of comparing all the different viruses. The first step is to ascertain the specimen source and select the method of preparation, e. g. negative stain or embedment, and whether the sample should be precleared by centrifugation, concentrated, or inoculated into tissue culture. Also, knowing the type of specimen and patient symptoms will lend suggestions of possible agents and eliminate some viruses, e. g. Rotavirus will not be seen in brain, nor Rabies in stool, but preconceived notions should not prejudice the observer into missing an unlikely pathogen.


1997 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 491-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. HIDAKA ◽  
I. IUCHI ◽  
M. TOMITA ◽  
Y. WATANABE ◽  
Y. MINATOGAWA ◽  
...  

Pathology ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroya Kato ◽  
Sukenari Koyabu ◽  
Shigenori Aoki ◽  
Takuya Tamai ◽  
Masahiro Sugawa ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document