High-dose intravenous vitamin C improves quality of life in cancer patients

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidenori Takahashi ◽  
Haruyoshi Mizuno ◽  
Atsuo Yanagisawa
2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (19) ◽  
pp. 3659-3664 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yvonne Brandberg ◽  
Helena Michelson ◽  
Bo Nilsson ◽  
Christina Bolund ◽  
Bjørn Erikstein ◽  
...  

Purpose: To compare, in high-risk breast cancer patients, the effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of two adjuvant treatments. Treatments were compared at eight points during the first year after random assignment to treatment with tailored fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) therapy for nine courses versus induction FEC therapy for three courses followed by high-dose chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin (CTCb) supported by peripheral-blood stem cells. Patients and Methods: From March 1994 to March 1998, 525 breast cancer patients (estimated relapse risk > 70% within 5 years with standard therapy) were included in the Scandinavian Breast Group 9401 study. HRQoL evaluation, using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30 and EORTC Breast Cancer Module–23, included 408 of 446 eligible patients in Finland, Norway, and Sweden. Results: Eighty-four percent to 95% of the patients completed questionnaires at eight points of assessment. Nostatistically significant overall differences were found between the tailored FEC group and the CTCb group for any of the HRQoL variables. Statistically significant differences over time were found for all HRQoL variables. HRQoL in the CTCb group demonstrated a steeper decrease, but a faster recovery than in the tailored FEC group. Emotional functioning improved with increased time from randomization. Higher levels of problems in body image and arm symptoms were reported in the tailored FEC group compared with the CTCb group. Sexual functioning and satisfaction were impaired during the study period. Conclusion: Both treatments had a negative influence on HRQoL during the treatment period. Despite the aggressive therapies, the patient’s HRQoL returned to levels found at inclusion on most variables.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS466-TPS466
Author(s):  
Yaacov Richard Lawrence ◽  
Tikva Meron ◽  
Adam P. Dicker ◽  
Camilla Zimmermann ◽  
Maoz Ben-Ayun ◽  
...  

TPS466 Background: Many cancer patients, especially those with pancreatic cancer, suffer from severe back/epigastric pain. Contemporary approaches (opioids, celiac blocks, systemic chemotherapy) are often inadequate. This clinical trial investigates a new approach in which high-dose radiation (radiosurgery) is focused on the retroperitoneal celiac plexus nerve bundle. Preliminary results from a single institution pilot trial NCT02356406 are promising: pain relief is substantial and side effects minimal. The main aim of the trial is to establish safety/efficacy in the setting of an international multicenter study. Exploratory analyses will examine the relationship between pain reduction and subjects’ quality-of-life, functionality, and caregiver burden. Methods: Eligibility criteria include a diagnosis of metastatic/unresectable malignancy, uncontrolled pain defined as ≥ 5 on 11-point BPI-SF scale despite analgesic use, typical retroperitoneal pain syndrome, prognosis > 8 weeks, ECOG 0-2, anatomical involvement of the celiac plexus (e.g. any pancreatic cancer, or any other cancer involving the celiac trunk). Exclusion criteria include previous upper abdo. radiation. The intervention consists of a single 25 Gy radiation fraction delivered to the celiac plexus, using anterolateral aspect of the aorta from the 12th thoracic to 2nd lumbar vertebral body as a surrogate structure. The primary tumour may be irradiated at physicians’ discretion. Dose-painting technique limits dose to organs at risk. Pain intensity will be measured using Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF), and quality of life with FACT-Hep. The primary endpoint is complete or partial pain response, defined as a decrease between the score immediately before treatment and 3 weeks’ post-treatment. A change of two or more on the BPI 11-point pain scale is defined as clinically significant. Secondary endpoints include other BPI pain endpoints, pain at 6 weeks, analgesic use, toxicity (CTCAE v4.03), quality of life and functional measures. Analgesia is not restricted. Expected accrual is 100 subjects over three years. Supported by Gateway for Cancer Research, additional support from Israel Cancer Association. Clinical trial information: NCT03323489.


2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Mikirova ◽  
Joseph Casciari ◽  
Andrea Rogers ◽  
Paul Taylor

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 940-944 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.C. Dagnelie ◽  
M.C.G. Pijls-Johannesma ◽  
P. Lambin ◽  
S. Beijer ◽  
D. De Ruysscher ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document