Systemic risk in the interbank market with overlapping portfolios and cross-ownership of the subordinated debts

2021 ◽  
Vol 562 ◽  
pp. 125355
Author(s):  
Shanshan Jiang ◽  
Hong Fan
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Risk ◽  
Interbank Market ◽  
Cross Ownership

Systemic Risk, Stress Testing, and Financial Contagion

2014 ◽  
pp. 282-310
Author(s):  
Calixto Lopez-Castañon ◽  
Serafin Martinez-Jaramillo ◽  
Fabrizio Lopez-Gallo
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Risk ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Stress Testing ◽  
Risk Measures ◽  
Banking System ◽  
Financial Contagion ◽  
Interbank Market ◽  
Coherent Risk ◽  
Central Bankers ◽  
Standard Risk

Despite the acknowledgment of the relevance of Systemic Risk, there is a lack of consensus on its definition and, more importantly, on the way it should be measured. Fortunately, there is a growing research agenda and more financial regulators, central bankers, and academics have recently been focusing on this field. In this chapter, the authors obtain a distribution of losses for the banking system as a whole. They are convinced that such distribution of losses is the key element that could be used to develop relevant measures for systemic risk. Their model contemplates several aspects, which they consider important regarding the concept of systemic risk: an initial macroeconomic shock, which weakens some institutions (some of them to the point of failure), a contagion process by means of the interbank market, and the resulting losses to the financial system as a whole. Finally, once the distribution is estimated, the authors derive standard risk measures for the system as a whole, focusing on the tail of the distribution (where the catastrophic or systemic events are located). By using the proposed framework, it is also possible to perform stress testing in a coherent way, including second round effects like contagion through the interbank market. Additionally, it is possible to follow the evolution of certain coherent risk measures, like the CVaR, in order to evaluate if the system is becoming more or less risky, in fact, more or less fragile. Additionally, the authors decompose the distribution of losses of the whole banking system into the systemic and the contagion elements and determine if the system is more prone to experience contagious difficulties during a certain period of time.

scholarly journals Systemic Risk in the Interbank Market with Overlapping Portfolios

Complexity ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shanshan Jiang ◽  
Hong Fan
Keyword(s):  
Interest Rate ◽  
Systemic Risk ◽  
Banking System ◽  
Bipartite Network ◽  
Investment Risk ◽  
Interbank Market ◽  
Operating Rules ◽  
Proposed Model ◽  
The Stability ◽  
The Impact

The increasing frequency and scope of the financial crisis have attracted more attention in the research of the systemic risk of banking system. A new model for the interbank market with overlapping portfolios is proposed to simulate a banking system in this work. The proposed model uses a bipartite network of banks and their assets to analyze the impact of bank investment on the stability of the banking system. In addition, this model introduces investment risk and allows banks to make up for liquidity by selling devaluated assets, which reflects the operating rules of the banking system more realistically. The results show that allowing banks to sell devaluated assets to make up for liquidity can improve the stability of the banking system and the interbank market can also improve the stability of the banking system. For the investment of banks, the investment risk is an uncertain factor that affects the stability of the banking system. The proposed model further analyzes the impact of average investment interest rate, savings interest rate, deposit reserve ratio, and investment asset diversity on the stability of the banking system. The model provides a tool for policy-makers and supervision agencies to prevent the systemic risk of banking system.

Systemic Risk, Stress Testing, and Financial Contagion

2013 ◽  
pp. 181-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serafin Martinez-Jaramillo ◽  
Calixto Lopez-Castañon ◽  
Fabrizio Lopez-Gallo
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Risk ◽  
Stress Testing ◽  
Risk Measures ◽  
Banking System ◽  
Financial Contagion ◽  
Coherent Risk Measures ◽  
Interbank Market ◽  
Coherent Risk

By using the proposed framework, it is also possible to perform stress testing in a coherent way, including second round effects like contagion through the interbank market. Additionally, it is possible to follow the evolution of certain coherent risk measures, like the CVaR, in order to evaluate if the system is becoming more or less risky, in fact, more or less fragile. Additionally, the authors decompose the distribution of losses of the whole banking system into the systemic and the contagion elements and determine if the system is more prone to experience contagious difficulties during a certain period of time.

scholarly journals The Stability of Interbank Market Network: A Perspective on Contagion and Risk Sharing

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi Xie ◽  
Yang Liu ◽  
Gang-Jin Wang ◽  
Yan Xu
Keyword(s):  
Commercial Bank ◽  
Systemic Risk ◽  
Commercial Banks ◽  
Risk Sharing ◽  
Main Channel ◽  
Risk Exposure ◽  
Interbank Market ◽  
Bank Of China ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Market Networks

As an important part of the financial system, interbank market provides banks with liquidity and credit lending and also is the main channel for risk contagion. In this paper, we test the existence of systematic risk contagion within the Chinese interbank market. By building the networks of the Chinese interbank market for each year and using the measure of mutual information, we quantitatively detect the changes of interbank market networks and observe that the correlations between banks become increasingly tighter in recent years. With the bilateral risk exposure among Chinese listed commercial banks, we find that the possibility of systemic risk contagion in Chinese interbank market is fairly small. But of great concern on each individual bank, the matter is different. Our simulation shows that the failures of three special banks (i.e., Agricultural Bank of China and Bank of China and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China) most likely lead to systemic risk contagion. Furthermore, we test the antirisk ability of the Chinese interbank market from the perspective of risk sharing and discover that the interbank market is stable when the loss scale is lower than forty percent of banks’ total core capital.

Systemic risk on the interbank market

2006 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 525-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulia Iori ◽  
Saqib Jafarey ◽  
Francisco G. Padilla
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Risk ◽  
Interbank Market
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document