PREVALENCE OF STAFNE BONE DEFECT BY RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION: A STUDY FROM 3 CENTERS IN BRAZIL

2020 ◽  
Vol 129 (1) ◽  
pp. e151-e152
Author(s):  
ANA CAROLINA MACEDO DA SILVA DIAS ◽  
AMANDA KATARINNY GOES GONZAGA ◽  
ISRAEL LEAL CAVALCANTE ◽  
PATRÍCIA TEIXEIRA DE OLIVEIRA ◽  
RENATA CORDEIRO TEIXEIRA MEDEIROS ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Sisman ◽  
O Miloglu ◽  
AE Sekerci ◽  
AB Yilmaz ◽  
O Demirtas ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 348-353
Author(s):  
Israel Leal Cavalcante ◽  
Hanna Isa de Oliveira Bezerra ◽  
Amanda Katarinny Goes Gonzaga ◽  
Larissa Moreira-Souza ◽  
Wilson Gustavo Cral ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
SONALI SHARMA ◽  
Dr. Sumit Bedi ◽  
Dr. Arishiya Fairozekhan Thapasum

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-166
Author(s):  
Gülay Altan ◽  
Sabri Cemil İşler ◽  
İlknur Özcan

SummaryBackround/Aim: Stafne bone cavity which is also known as lingual mandibular bone defect is generally seen in the posterior region of the mandible. Stafne bone defects of the anterior mandible are very rare, with around 50 cases reported in the English literature. They are generally asymptomatic and incidental lesion findings may be diagnosed during a radiographic examination.Case Report: A 59 year-old female patient was examined for dental complaints. Panoramic radiography revealed a unilocular lesion at the left incisor- premolar area. Dental volumetric tomography scans showed a concavity at the lingual side of the related area. Magnetic resonance imaging was suggested for possible soft tissue pathology and, depending on MRI finding, the cavity was initially diagnosed as Stafne bone defect.Conclusion: The aim of this case report is to describe an unusually located Stafne bone cavity with special emphasis to the need of using special imaging modalities.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 (apr19 1) ◽  
pp. bcr2013009483-bcr2013009483 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Saglam ◽  
M. Salihoglu ◽  
A. K. Sivrioglu ◽  
K. Kara

Author(s):  
Isadora Pereira Gomes ◽  
Leila Nara Nogueira Magalhães ◽  
Maria Cássia Ferreira De Aguiar ◽  
Tânia Mara Pimenta Amaral ◽  
Evandro Neves Abdo ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
MARIA ELISA RANGEL JANINI ◽  
VALDIR MEIRELLES JÚNIOR ◽  
JOSÉ ALEXANDRE CURVELO ◽  
FÁBIO RIBEIRO GUEDES ◽  
RAFAEL NETTO ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
MARILEIDE URDAX ABBUD ◽  
KAREN RAMOS BARIFOUSE RAMADA ◽  
RODRIGO VILLAMARIM SOARES ◽  
BERNARDO QUIROGA SOUKI ◽  
KYRIA SPYRO SPYRIDES ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 378-382
Author(s):  
Mu-Hsiung Chen ◽  
Chin-Ting Kao ◽  
Julia Yu-Fong Chang ◽  
Yi-Ping Wang ◽  
Yu-Hsueh Wu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronique Christiaens ◽  
Ruben Pauwels ◽  
Bassant Mowafey ◽  
Reinhilde Jacobs

Abstract BackgroundThe use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) in dentistry started in the maxillofacial field, where it was used for complex and comprehensive treatment planning. Due to the reduced radiation dose compared to a Computed Tomography (CT) scan, CBCT has become a frequently used diagnostic tool in dental practice. However, published data on the accuracy of CBCT in the diagnosis of the buccal bone level is lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of intra-oral radiography (IOR) as well as CBCT in the diagnosis of the extent of buccal bone loss.MethodsA dry skull was used to create a buccal bone defect at the most coronal level of a first premolar; the defect was enlarged apically in steps of 1 mm. After each step, IOR and CBCT were taken. Based on CBCT data 2 observers jointly selected 3 axial slices at different levels of the buccal bone, as well as one transverse slice. Six dentists participated in radiographic observations. First, all observers received the 10 intra-oral radiographs and each observer was asked to rank the intra-oral radiographs on the extent of the buccal bone defect. Afterwards, the procedure was repeated with the CBCTs based on a combination of axial and transverse information. For the second part of the study, each observer was asked to evaluate axial as well as transverse CBCT slices on the presence or absence of a buccal bone defect. ResultsThe percentage of buccal bone defect progression rankings that were within 1 of the true rank was 32% for IOR and 42% for CBCT. On average, kappa values were increased by 0.384 for CBCT compared with intra-oral radiography. The overall sensitivity and specificity of CBCT in the diagnosis of the presence or absence of a buccal bone defect was 0.89 and 0.85, respectively. The average area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC was 0.892 for all observers.ConclusionWhen CBCT images are available for justified indications, other than bone level assessment, such 3D images are more accurate and thus preferred to 2D images to assess periodontal buccal bone. For other clinical applications, intra-oral radiography remains the standard method for radiographic evaluation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document