Systematic review: treatment of atrophic vaginitis in breast cancer patients treated with aromatase inhibitors

Maturitas ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 192
Author(s):  
Aurelie Joris ◽  
Serge Rozenberg
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Aromatase Inhibitors ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Atrophic Vaginitis

Toxicity of extended adjuvant aromatase inhibitors therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 549-549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hadar Goldvaser ◽  
Domen Ribnikar ◽  
Tristan Alexandra Barnes ◽  
David W. Cescon ◽  
Alberto Ocana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Aromatase Inhibitors ◽  
Bone Fractures ◽  
Treatment Discontinuation ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Second Cancers

549 Background: Aromatase inhibitors (AI) are a gold standard adjuvant endocrine therapy for postmenopausal women with breast cancer. A number of randomized trials (RCTs) have reported modest improvements in breast cancer outcomes from extending treatment with AI beyond the initial 5 years after diagnosis. However, less in known about the toxicity of extended AI compared with no therapy. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of MEDLINE to identify RCTs that compared extended AI to placebo or no treatment. The search was supplemented by a review of abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology and San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium meetings between 2013 and 2016. Odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CI), absolute risks, and the number needed to harm (NNH) associated with one adverse event were computed for prespecified safety and tolerability outcomes including cardiovascular disease, bone fractures, second cancers (excluding new breast cancer), treatment discontinuation due to adverse events and death without recurrence. Results: Seven trials comprising 16349 patients met the inclusion criteria. Longer treatment with AI was associated with increased odds of cardiovascular disease (OR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.00-1.40, P=0.05; NNH = 122) and bone fractures (OR = 1.34, 95% CI 1.16 - 1.55, P < 0.001; NNH = 72). Compared to control, longer AI therapy was associated with a higher odds of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (OR = 1.45, 95% CI 1.25 - 1.68, P < 0.001; NNH = 20). Longer AI therapy did not influence the odds of second cancers (OR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.73-1.18, P = 0.56). There was a numerical excess of death without recurrence with longer AI therapy, but this was not statistically significant (OR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.9 - 1.36, P = 0.34). Conclusions: Longer durations of AI use are associated with increased cardiovascular events and bone fracture. There is a numerical, but non-statistically significant excess of deaths without breast cancer recurrence among patients receiving longer AI therapy. These data should be taken into account when considering extended adjuvant AI therapy for breast cancer patients.

scholarly journals Comparison of the clinical effectiveness of treatments for aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia in breast cancer patients: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. e033461
Author(s):  
Kyeore Bae ◽  
Si Yeon Song
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Aromatase Inhibitor ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Indirect Evidence ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Patient Reported

IntroductionAromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia (AIA) is a major adverse event of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and leads to premature discontinuation of AI therapy in breast cancer patients. The objective of this protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) is to provide the methodology to compare the change in pain intensity between different AIA treatments and demonstrate the rank probabilities for different treatments by combining all available direct and indirect evidence.Methods and analysisPubMed, the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov will be searched to identify publications in English from inception to November 2019. We will include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of different treatments for AIA in postmenopausal women with stage 0–III hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. The primary endpoints will be the change in patient-reported pain intensity from baseline to post-treatment. The number of adverse events will be presented as a secondary outcome.Both pairwise meta-analysis and NMA with the Frequentist approach will be conducted. We will demonstrate summary estimates with forest plots in meta-analysis and direct and mixed evidence with a ranking of the treatments as the P-score in NMA. The revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials will be used to assess the methodological quality within individual RCTs. The quality of evidence will be assessed.Ethics and disseminationAs this review does not involve individual patients, ethical approval is not required. The results of this systematic review and NMA will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. This review will provide valuable information on AIA therapeutic options for clinicians, health practitioners and breast cancer survivors.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019136967.

scholarly journals 54P Overweight and prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S43-S44
Author(s):  
K.S. Harborg ◽  
R. Zachariae ◽  
J. Olsen ◽  
M. Johannsen ◽  
D. Cronin-Fenton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document