scholarly journals Intersubjectivity and other grounds for action-coordination in an environment of restricted interaction: Coordinating with oncoming traffic when passing an obstacle

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 ◽  
pp. 22-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnulf Deppermann
Keyword(s):  
Motor Control ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jurjen Bosga ◽  
Ruud G. J. Meulenbroek

Cognition ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 178 ◽  
pp. 103-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Wolf ◽  
Natalie Sebanz ◽  
Günther Knoblich

2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 745-767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillermo M. Cejudo ◽  
Cynthia L. Michel

2009 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benoît Lenzen ◽  
Catherine Theunissen ◽  
Marc Cloes

This exploratory study aimed to investigate elements involved in decision making in team handball live situations and to provide coaches and educators with teaching recommendations. The study was positioned within the framework of the situated action paradigm of which two aspects were of particular interest for this project: (a) the relationship between planning and action, and (b) the perception-action coordination. We used qualitative methods that linked (a) video observation of six female elite players’ actions during two championship matches and (b) self-confrontation interviews. Players’ verbalizations reflected that their decision making included the following: (a) perception (visual, auditory, tactile, proprioceptive), (b) knowledge (concepts, teammates and opponents’ characteristics, experience), (c) expectations (opponents and teammates’ intentions), and (d) contextual elements (score, power play, players on the field, match difficulty). Findings were discussed in terms of teaching implications.


Author(s):  
Marlene Meyer ◽  
Harold Bekkering ◽  
Markus Paulus ◽  
Sabine Hunnius

2011 ◽  
Vol 211 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 517-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cordula Vesper ◽  
Robrecht P. R. D. van der Wel ◽  
Günther Knoblich ◽  
Natalie Sebanz

Dialogue ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 703-718
Author(s):  
Roberto Miguelez

AbstractLanguage plays a crucial role in human forms of action coordination. This paper examines problems concerning the satisfaction of a major and complex condition of coordination of actions grounded in dialogue, i.e., equality of argumentative competence. It is, indeed, the satisfaction of this condition that defines the autonomy of the subjects participating in and committed to a dialogue situation. From a political point of view, this question can be examined as a problem of dialogical democracy. This paper proposes the autonomy of subjects as a major condition for the realization of such a political form.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document