scholarly journals Low mortality rates after endovascular aortic repair expand use to high-risk patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 424-432.e1
Author(s):  
Shaunak S. Adkar ◽  
Megan C. Turner ◽  
Harold J. Leraas ◽  
Brian F. Gilmore ◽  
Uttara Nag ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-20.e3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor Voskresensky ◽  
Salvatore T. Scali ◽  
Robert J. Feezor ◽  
Javairiah Fatima ◽  
Kristina A. Giles ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor X. Mosquera ◽  
José M. Herrera ◽  
Milagros Marini ◽  
Francisco Estevez ◽  
Ignacio Cao ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (01) ◽  
pp. 56
Author(s):  
Alessandro Cannavale ◽  
Mariangela Santoni ◽  
Fabrizio Fanelli ◽  
Gerard O’sullivan ◽  
◽  
...  

The management of patients with aortic dissection is challenging and its treatment is an area of development and innovation. Conventional surgical techniques are associated with significant risks in terms of mortality and morbidity in such high-risk patients. As a result of cumulative advances in technology, classical surgical techniques have been improved and enhanced by the newer endovascular approaches, leading to novel surgical hybrid procedures. Impressive early results have been seen with frozen elephant techniques, revascularisation of the supra-aortic branches and branched/fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair-alone procedures. This review describes the techniques involved in the latest hybrid procedures for aortic dissection and their outcomes.


2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A376-A376
Author(s):  
B JEETSANDHU ◽  
R JAIN ◽  
J SINGH ◽  
M JAIN ◽  
J SHARMA ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 436-436
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Kane ◽  
Martha K. Terris ◽  
William J. Aronson ◽  
Joseph C. Presti ◽  
Christopher L. Amling ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document