Medial prefrontal cortex and the self in major depression

2012 ◽  
Vol 136 (1-2) ◽  
pp. e1-e11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cédric Lemogne ◽  
Pauline Delaveau ◽  
Maxime Freton ◽  
Sophie Guionnet ◽  
Philippe Fossati
2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (7) ◽  
pp. 2512-2527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weihua Zhao ◽  
Shuxia Yao ◽  
Qin Li ◽  
Yayuan Geng ◽  
Xiaole Ma ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 372-419
Author(s):  
Richard E. Passingham

This chapter and the next one consider how to account for the astonishing difference in intelligence between humans and our nearest living ancestors, the great apes. An integrated system that includes the dorsal prefrontal cortex and the parietal association cortex is activated when subjects attempt tests of non-verbal intelligence. It has been suggested that this system might act as a ‘multiple-demand system’ or ‘global workspace’ that can deal with any problem. However, closer examination suggests that the tasks used to support this claim have in common that they involve abstract sequences. These problems can be solved by visual imagery alone. But humans also have the advantage that they also have access to a propositional code. This means that they can solve problems that involve verbal reasoning, as well as being able to form detailed plans for the future. They can also form explicit judgements about themselves, including their perceptions, actions, and memories, and this means that they can represent themselves as individuals. The representation of the self depends in part on tissue in the medial prefrontal cortex (PF).


2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1054-1060 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Civai ◽  
Carlo Miniussi ◽  
Raffaella I. Rumiati

2007 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 935-944 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnaud D'Argembeau ◽  
Perrine Ruby ◽  
Fabienne Collette ◽  
Christian Degueldre ◽  
Evelyne Balteau ◽  
...  

The medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) appears to play a prominent role in two fundamental aspects of social cognition, that is, self-referential processing and perspective taking. However, it is currently unclear whether the same or different regions of the MPFC mediate these two interdependent processes. This functional magnetic resonance imaging study sought to clarify the issue by manipulating both dimensions in a factorial design. Participants judged the extent to which trait adjectives described their own personality (e.g., “Are you sociable?”) or the personality of a close friend (e.g., “Is Caroline sociable?”) and were also asked to put themselves in the place of their friend (i.e., to take a third-person perspective) and estimate how this person would judge the adjectives, with the target of the judgments again being either the self (e.g., “According to Caroline, are you sociable?”) or the other person (e.g., “According to Caroline, is she sociable?”). We found that self-referential processing (i.e., judgments targeting the self vs. the other person) yielded activation in the ventral and dorsal anterior MPFC, whereas perspective taking (i.e., adopting the other person's perspective, rather than one's own, when making judgments) resulted in activation in the posterior dorsal MPFC; the interaction between the two dimensions yielded activation in the left dorsal MPFC. These findings show that self-referential processing and perspective taking recruit distinct regions of the MPFC and suggest that the left dorsal MPFC may be involved in decoupling one's own from other people's perspectives on the self.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camill Burden ◽  
Ryan C. Leach ◽  
Allison M. Sklenar ◽  
Pauline Urban Levy ◽  
Andrea N. Frankenstein ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 364 (1521) ◽  
pp. 1291-1300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aron K. Barbey ◽  
Frank Krueger ◽  
Jordan Grafman

We propose that counterfactual representations for reasoning about the past or predicting the future depend on structured event complexes (SECs) in the human prefrontal cortex (PFC; ‘What would happen if X were performed in the past or enacted in the future?’). We identify three major categories of counterfactual thought (concerning action versus inaction, the self versus other and upward versus downward thinking) and propose that each form of inference recruits SEC representations in distinct regions of the medial PFC. We develop a process model of the regulatory functions these representations serve and draw conclusions about the importance of SECs for explaining the past and predicting the future.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 348-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoe Samara ◽  
Elisabeth A.T. Evers ◽  
Frenk Peeters ◽  
Harry B.M. Uylings ◽  
Grazyna Rajkowska ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document