Constraints in multi-objective optimization of land use allocation – Repair or penalize?

2019 ◽  
Vol 118 ◽  
pp. 241-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Strauch ◽  
Anna F. Cord ◽  
Carola Pätzold ◽  
Sven Lautenbach ◽  
Andrea Kaim ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Mehran Shaygan ◽  
Abbas Alimohammadi ◽  
Ali Mansourian ◽  
Zohreh Shams Govara ◽  
S. Mostapha Kalami

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 163-186
Author(s):  
Jamshid Maleki ◽  
Farshad Hakimpour ◽  
Zohreh Masoumi ◽  
◽  
◽  
...  

Author(s):  
LIU Menghao ◽  
XI Jianchao

The optimization of the spatial structure and layout is to determine an optimal and cost-effective land-use allocation plan for protected areas. The key goal is to maximizing the value of ecosystem services. This paper establishes a framework for optimizing the spatial structure and layout of the protected area based on ecosystem services. With the objective of maximizing the value of ecosystem services, it uses the CoMOLA (Constrained Multi-objective Optimization of Land-use Allocation) model for multi-objective optimization under the constraints of area and conversion rules. Taking the Yellow River’s headwaters region in the Three-River-Source (Sanjiangyuan) National Park as the study area, this paper uses the data of the year 2015 as a benchmark, and obtains the optimization results of the study area by 2035. The results show that the total value of ecosystem services of the Yellow River’s headwaters region after optimization will reach RMB [Formula: see text], with a total increase of RMB [Formula: see text] (8.47%). The land covers that contribute most to the value of ecosystem services are rivers, lakes and wetlands (51.55%), and grasslands (40.71%). Among the various types of ecosystem services, the value of provisioning services will increase by RMB [Formula: see text], regulating services by RMB [Formula: see text], supporting services by RMB [Formula: see text], and cultural services by RMB [Formula: see text]. The research results can provide a scientific basis for the spatial optimization of protected areas and the management of national parks.


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 927 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guadalupe Azuara García ◽  
Efrén Palacios Rosas ◽  
Alfonso García-Ferrer ◽  
Pilar Montesinos Barrios

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Kaim ◽  
Michael Strauch ◽  
Martin Volk

One way to solve multi-objective spatial land use allocation problems is to calculate a set of Pareto-optimal solutions and include stakeholder preferences after the optimization process. There are various land use allocation studies that identify the Pareto frontier (i.e., trade-off curve); to our knowledge, however, for the majority of them, the debate on which solutions are preferred by stakeholders or are preferred by stakeholders remains open. One reason could be that Pareto-optimal solutions, due to their multi-dimensionality, are difficult to communicate. To fill this gap, we give an example using the results of a multi-objective agricultural land use allocation problem that maximizes four biophysical objectives: agricultural production, water quality, water quantity, and biodiversity in the Lossa River Basin in Central Germany. We conducted expert interviews with 11 local stakeholders from different backgrounds, e.g., water experts, nature conservationists, farmers, etc. In addition to providing information about the case study area, we visualized the trade-offs between the different objectives using parallel coordinates plots that allowed the stakeholders to browse through the optimal solutions. Based on this information, the stakeholders set weights for each of the objectives by applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). With these weights, we selected the preferred solutions from the Pareto-optimal set. The results show that, overall, stakeholders clearly ranked water quality first, followed by biodiversity, water quantity, and agricultural production. The corresponding land use maps show a huge difference in land management (e.g., less application of fertilizer, more linear elements, and conservation tillage) for the preferred solutions compared to the current status. The method presented in this study can help decision makers finding land use and land management strategies based on both biophysical modeling results and stakeholder expertise, and it shows how multi-objective optimization results can be communicated and used for an information-based decision-making process.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document