Additional viscous dampers for civil structures: Analysis of design methods based on effective evaluation of modal damping ratios

2009 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 1093-1101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Occhiuzzi
2012 ◽  
Vol 238 ◽  
pp. 648-651
Author(s):  
Zhi Hao Wang

The classical outrigger in frame-core tube structure cantilevering from the core tube or shear wall connected to the perimeter columns directly, which can effectively improve the lateral stiffness of the structure. A new energy-dissipation system for such structural system is studied, where the outrigger and perimeter columns are separate and vertical viscous dampers are equipped between the outrigger and perimeter columns to make full use of the relative big displacement of two components. The effectiveness of proposed system is evaluated by means of the modal damping ratio based on the proposed simplified model. The mathematic models of the structural system are obtained with both the assumed mode shape method and finite element method according to the simplified calculation diagram. Based on the modal damping ratio, the optimal damping coefficients of linear viscous dampers are determined, and effectiveness of proposed system is confirmed.


Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (17) ◽  
pp. 4824
Author(s):  
Alireza Tabrizikahou ◽  
Mieczysław Kuczma ◽  
Piotr Nowotarski ◽  
Małgorzata Kwiatek ◽  
Ahad Javanmardi

Every year, structural flaws or breakdowns cause thousands of people to be harmed and cost billions of dollars owing to the limitations of design methods and materials to withstand extreme earthquakes. Since earthquakes have a significant effect on sustainability factors, there is a contradiction between these constraints and the growing need for more sustainable structures. There has been a significant attempt to circumvent these constraints by developing various techniques and materials. One of these viable possibilities is the application of smart structures and materials such as shape memory and piezoelectric materials. Many scholars have examined the use of these materials and their structural characteristics up to this point, but the relationship between sustainability considerations and the deployment of smart materials has received little attention. Therefore, through a review of previous experimental, numerical, and conceptual studies, this paper attempts to draw a more significant relationship between smart materials and structural sustainability. First, the significant impact of seismic events on structural sustainability and its major aspects are described. It is then followed by an overview of the fundamentals of smart material’s behaviour and properties. Finally, after a comprehensive review of the most recent applications of smart materials in structures, the influence of their deployment on sustainability issues is discussed. The findings of this study are intended to assist researchers in properly addressing sustainability considerations in any research and implementation of smart materials by establishing a more explicit relationship between these two concepts.


2017 ◽  
Vol 199 ◽  
pp. 1152-1157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Domenico Altieri ◽  
Enrico Tubaldi ◽  
Edoardo Patelli ◽  
Andrea Dall’Asta

1993 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 406-407
Author(s):  
Donald B. Yarbrough ◽  
Monika Schaffner

Author(s):  
Silvia PIZZOCARO ◽  
Pınar KAYGAN ◽  
HARMAN Kerry ◽  
Erik BOHEMIA

Co-design is a process in which designers and users collaborate as ‘equals’ to develop innovative solutions. Co-design methods are increasingly used by professional designers to facilitate and enable users to co-develop innovative solutions for ‘themselves’. For example, the Design Council is advocating the use of co-design methods to support the development of practical innovative solutions to social problems such as increased cost of elderly care and tackling child poverty. The involvement of users in developing solutions acknowledges that their take up is dependent on the ways users create and negotiate meanings of objects and services.


Author(s):  
Federico VAZ ◽  
Sharon PRENDEVILLE

Described as units developing public policies in a design-oriented manner, Policy Labs are tasked to innovate to gain in policy effectiveness and efficiency. However, as public policymaking is a context-dependent activity, the way in which these novel organisations operate significantly differs. This study discusses the emergence of design approaches for policy innovation. The purpose is to map how Policy Labs in Europe introduce design approaches at distinct stages of the policymaking cycle. For this study, 30 organisations in Europe operating at various levels of government were surveyed. Based on the public policymaking process model, it investigates which design methods are Policy Labs deploying to innovate public policies. The study exposed a gap in the awareness of the utilised methods' nature. It also showed that the use of design methods is of less importance than the introduction of design mindsets for public policy innovation, namely ‘user-centredness’, ‘co-creation’, and ‘exploration’.


Author(s):  
Jordan T. Camp

While many analysts have commented on the representation of 1968 campus events and antiwar demonstrations, less attention has been paid to the global significance of the dramatic struggles in industrial Detroit during the period. The meanings of events in the city were intensely fought over. As Stuart Hall, Chas Critcher, Tony Jefferson, John Clarke, and Brian Roberts observed, the events of 1968 were “an act of collective will, the breaks and ruptures stemming from the rapid expansion in the ideology, culture and civil structures of the new capitalism . . . in the form of a ‘crisis of authority.’” In Detroit the crisis of authority was expressed in the form of popular political struggles against racism, state violence, and the contradictions of life in the industrial capitalist city. This article asks and answers the following research questions about the struggle over the meaning of this decisive turning point in US history: What was the relationship between racial ordering, uneven capitalist development, and mass antiracist and class struggles? How did Black working-class organic intellectuals resist and alter hegemonic definitions of the situation? How are the dialectics of insurgency and counterinsurgency to be best theorized during this precise historical conjuncture? 


PCI Journal ◽  
1959 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 31-42
Author(s):  
H. Rusch
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document