scholarly journals Barley yellow dwarf disease risk assessment based on Bayesian modelling of aphid population dynamics

2006 ◽  
Vol 193 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 457-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Fabre ◽  
J.S. Pierre ◽  
C.A. Dedryver ◽  
M. Plantegenest
2019 ◽  
Vol 96 (4) ◽  
pp. 754-764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamaranga H. S. Peiris ◽  
Robert L. Bowden ◽  
Timothy C. Todd ◽  
William W. Bockus ◽  
Mark A. Davis ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 90 (8) ◽  
pp. 860-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Leclercq-Le Quillec ◽  
M. Plantegenest ◽  
G. Riault ◽  
C. A. Dedryver

Population dynamics of Padi avenae (PAV), Macrosiphum avenae (MAV), and Rhopalosiphum padi (RPV) virus serotypes of Barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV) and of their main aphid vectors were studied in winter barley (Hordeum vulgare) fields for three successive years in western France. An epidemiological model of the spread of viruses in the field was developed based on vector populations as forcing variables and the population dynamics of each virus serotype. This model accurately simulated the kinetics of the epidemic for PAV serotypes, which are the most common ones. For RPV and to some extent for MAV, the results were less satisfactory. The occurrence and spread of PAV and MAV serotypes in the field was clearly and easily related to that of their main vector species. Conversely, the spread of RPV serotypes showed no consistent relationships with the dynamics of their vectors. Incidence of PAV in 1989 to 1990 and 1990 to 1991 showed a bimodal distribution, with maximums in fall (December) and spring (May) that were linked to fall infestations by R. padi and spring infestations by three (R. padi, Sitobion avenae, and Metopolophium dirhodum) or two (S. avenae and M. dirhodum) aphid species. In 1991 to 1992, the PAV infection curve was monomodal and mainly due to a primary spread of the virus by very large populations of alate R. padi. MAV incidence was low in fall and winter and reached a maximum in spring 1990 and 1991 related to the occurrence of S. avenae and M. dirhodum. RPV incidence was low every year, despite the abundance of its vector, R. padi. Mixed infections were more frequent than expected by chance and were assumed to be partly related to heterologous encapsidation. The occurrence of each serotype is discussed in relation to the time of crop infection and possible damage.


2012 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-22
Author(s):  
Katarzyna Golnik

The aim of this work was to give a brief review of some points of wide knowledge of barley yellow dwarf (BYD) disease and its breeding for resistance program.<i>Yd2</i> gene has been shortly characterised. Current situation in Poland has been underlined.


1983 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 338-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Makoto KOJIMA ◽  
Akira MATSUBARA ◽  
Seiji YANASE ◽  
Shigemitsu TORIYAMA

2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frédéric Fabre ◽  
Manuel Plantegenest ◽  
Lucie Mieuzet ◽  
Charles A. Dedryver ◽  
Jean-Luc Leterrier ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 134 ◽  
pp. 105171
Author(s):  
Anil Adhikari ◽  
Benham E. Lockhart ◽  
Mala Ganiger ◽  
Emmanuel Byamukama ◽  
Connie Tande ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 153-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfred Stoetzer ◽  
Jackson Kawakami ◽  
Alberto Luiz Marsaro Júnior ◽  
Douglas Lau ◽  
Paulo Roberto Valle da Silva Pereira ◽  
...  

The objective of this work was to evaluate the protective effect of different forms of insecticide application on the transmission of yellow dwarf disease in barley cultivars, as well as to determine the production costs and the net profit of these managements. The experiments were carried out during 2011 and 2012 growing seasons, using the following managements at main plots: T1, seed treatment with insecticide (ST) + insecticide on shoots at 15-day interval; T2, just ST; T3, insecticide applied on shoots, when aphid control level (CL) was reached; T4, without insecticide; and T5, ST + insecticide on shoots when CL was reached. Different barley cultivars - BRS Cauê, BRS Brau and MN 6021 - were arranged in the subplots. Insecticides lambda cyhalothrin (pyrethroid) and thiamethoxam (neonicotinoid) were used. There were differences on yellow dwarf disease index in both seasons for the different treatments, while damage to grain yield was influenced by year and aphid population. Production costs and net profit were different among treatments. Seed treatment with insecticide is sufficient to reduce the transmission of yellow dwarf disease in years with low aphid population pressure, while in years with larger populations, the application of insecticide on shoots is also required.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document