scholarly journals Use of a Superolateral Portal and 70° Arthroscope to Optimize Visualization of Patellofemoral Tracking and Osteochondral Lesions in Patients With Recurrent Patellar Instability

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. e1731-e1736
Author(s):  
Ryan Bell ◽  
Andrew E. Jimenez ◽  
Benjamin J. Levy ◽  
Robert Willson ◽  
Robert A. Arciero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patellar Instability ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Recurrent Patellar Instability

Diagnostic Value of MRI and Radiographs of the Knee to Identify Osteochondral Lesions in Acute Patellar Instability

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hayden Baker ◽  
Jason Dickherber ◽  
Manoj Reddy ◽  
Andrew Rizzi ◽  
Adam Kahn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patellar Instability ◽  
Osteochondral Defect ◽  
Knee Arthroscopy ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Mpfl Reconstruction ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Loose Bodies ◽  
Plain Radiographs ◽  
Diagnostic Arthroscopy

AbstractThe purpose of this study was to define the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and plain radiographs (X-ray [XR]) in identifying an osteochondral defect or loose body in patients undergoing operative treatment for patellar instability. A total of 87 patients treated operatively for patellar instability with medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction between 2015 and 2019 were identified. Inclusion criteria were evidence of clinical patellar instability, preoperative XR and MRI studies, and concomitant diagnostic knee arthroscopy and MPFL reconstruction performed to address patellar instability. Patients were excluded if they had a history of prior procedure for patellar instability on the surgical knee, underwent MPFL reconstruction without concomitant diagnostic knee arthroscopy, or had an anterior cruciate ligament or posterior cruciate ligament deficient knee. Operative notes and arthroscopic images were reviewed to identify osteochondral or chondral injuries and loose bodies noted during diagnostic arthroscopy. The primary outcome was the identification of intra-articular loose bodies, chondral injury, or osteochondral defect on preoperative plain radiographs and MRI in patients with patellar instability. All MRIs were performed on a 3T MRI. The sensitivity and specificity of identifying loose bodies on MRI were 0.52 and 0.92 and on XR were 0.23 and 0.98, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of identifying osteochondral lesions on MRI were 0.43 and 0.81 and on XR were 0.08 and 0.97, respectively. Of the 87 available reports, 45 (51%) described performing chondroplasty for Outerbridge grade II/III chondral lesions on diagnostic arthroscopy. In conclusion, MRI and XR are poorly sensitive at identifying loose bodies or osteochondral defects after patellar dislocations. The poor sensitivity of imaging studies must be considered when determining whether or not to recommend operative management to a patient with patellar instability. This is a Level IV, diagnostic study.

Clinical Comparison of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction With or Without Tibial Tuberosity Transfer for Recurrent Patellar Instability

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110377
Author(s):  
Jong-Min Kim ◽  
Jae-Ang Sim ◽  
HongYeol Yang ◽  
Young-Mo Kim ◽  
Joon-Ho Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Patellar Instability ◽  
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament ◽  
Tibial Tuberosity ◽  
Mpfl Reconstruction ◽  
Trochlear Groove ◽  
Functional Failure ◽  
Radiological Parameters ◽  
Recurrent Patellar Instability

Background: No clear guidelines or widespread consensus has defined a threshold value of tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance for choosing the appropriate surgical procedures when additional tibial tuberosity osteotomy (TTO) should be added to augment medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction for recurrent patellar instability. Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes between MPFL reconstruction and MPFL reconstruction with TTO for patients who have patellar instability with a TT-TG distance of 15 to 25 mm. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 81 patients who underwent surgical treatment using either MPFL reconstruction or MPFL reconstruction with TTO for recurrent patellar instability with a TT-TG distance of 15 to 25 mm; the mean follow-up was 25.2 months (range, 12.0-53.0 months). The patients were divided into 2 groups: isolated MPFL reconstruction (iMPFL group; n = 36) performed by 2 surgeons and MPFL reconstruction with TTO (TTO group; n = 45) performed by another 2 surgeons. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Kujala score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and Tegner activity score. Radiological parameters, including patellar height, TT-TG distance, patellar tilt, and congruence angle were compared between the 2 groups. Functional failure based on clinical apprehension sign, repeat subluxation or dislocation, and subjective instability and complications was assessed at the final follow-up. We also compared clinical outcomes based on subgroups of preoperative TT-TG distance (15 mm ≤ TT-TG ≤ 20 mm vs 20 mm < TT-TG ≤ 25 mm). Results: All of the clinical outcome parameters significantly improved in both groups at the final follow-up ( P < .001), with no significant differences between groups. The radiological parameters also showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. The incidence of functional failure was similar between the 2 groups (3 failures in the TTO group and 2 failures in the iMPFL group; P = .42). In the TTO group, 1 patient experienced a repeat dislocation postoperatively and 2 patients had subjective instability; in the iMPFL group, 2 patients had subjective instability. The prevalence of complications did not differ between the 2 groups ( P = .410). In the subgroup analysis based on TT-TG distance, we did not note any differences in clinical outcomes between iMPFL and TTO groups in subgroups of 15 mm ≤ TT-TG ≤ 20 mm and 20 mm < TT-TG ≤ 25 mm. Conclusion: MPFL reconstruction with and without TTO provided similar, satisfactory clinical outcomes and low redislocation rates for patients who had patellar instability with a TT-TG distance of 15 to 25 mm, without statistical difference. Thus, our findings suggest that iMPFL reconstruction is a safe and reliable treatment for patients with recurrent patellar dislocation with a TT-TG distance of 15 to 25 mm, without the disadvantages derived from TTO.

Arthroscopic Medial Retinacular Imbrication for the Treatment of Recurrent Patellar Instability: A Simple and All-Inside Technique

Orthopedics ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 524-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hu Xu ◽  
Chunli Zhang ◽  
Guoxian Pei ◽  
Qinsheng Zhu ◽  
Yisheng Han
Keyword(s):  
Patellar Instability ◽  
Recurrent Patellar Instability

Recurrent Patellar Instability

2018 ◽  
pp. 149-169
Author(s):  
Robin West ◽  
Ryan S. Murray ◽  
Daniel M. Dean
Keyword(s):  
Patellar Instability ◽  
Recurrent Patellar Instability

scholarly journals Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Patellar Instability in Skeletally Immature versus Mature Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7_suppl6) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0047
Author(s):  
Simone Gruber ◽  
Rhiannon Miller ◽  
Beth Shubin Stein ◽  
Joseph Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Growth Plate ◽  
Patellar Instability ◽  
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Mpfl Reconstruction ◽  
Skeletally Immature ◽  
Immature Group ◽  
Chi Square Analysis ◽  
Recurrent Patellar Instability ◽  
Mature Population

Objectives: Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is the standard of care surgical treatment for recurrent patellar instability. Recurrent patellar instability is common after a first-time dislocation in the skeletally immature population. Adult-type reconstruction techniques are often avoided in skeletally immature patients due to the proximity of the femoral insertion of the MFPL to the distal femoral physis. It is currently unclear how outcomes of MPFL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients compare to those for skeletally mature patients. The objective of this study is to present the outcomes of isolated MPFL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients and compare their findings to a skeletally mature population. Methods: Patients were identified from an institutional patellofemoral registry who underwent isolated MPFL reconstruction from March 2014 to July 2018. Demographic, radiographic, and knee-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected prior to surgery. Follow-up data collection included knee surveys collected at 1 and 2-years following MPFL reconstruction. Additionally, return to sport rates and episodes of re-dislocations were also collected. Comparisons of demographic and clinical data were made between skeletally immature and mature patients. Sub-analysis was performed on outcomes in skeletally immature patients who underwent MPFL reconstruction where the graft was placed distal to the physis to avoid the growth plate versus those who had standard placement of the graft. Baseline factors were analyzed using independent samples t-tests or chi-square analysis. Longitudinal analysis of knee PROMs was conducted using generalized estimating equation (GEE) modeling. Statistical significance was defined as p-values of 0.05 or less. Results: The study cohort included 107 patients (25 skeletally immature, 82 skeletally mature). Mean age of the study groups was 13.8 years in the immature group (range 11-15) and 21.3 in the mature group (range 14-34). No differences in sex (72% female in both groups) or obesity (0% vs. 8%) was observed between immature and mature patients. Radiographic measures of Caton-Deschamps Index (1.18 in both groups), TT-TG (14.9 vs. 14.8), and Dejour classification (P=0.328) also saw no differences between groups. Longitudinal outcomes in KOOS QoL, IKDC, KOOS PS, and Kujala surveys found no differences between immature versus mature patients over time. However, higher PediFABS was observed in the immature group versus mature at baseline (21.6 vs. 11.9, P<0.001), 1-year (18.1 vs. 11.5, P=0.006), and 2-years (22.4 vs. 11.5, P=0.003). Low incidence of post-operative dislocation and a high return to sport rate was observed in both skeletally immature and mature patients. No statistical differences were observed in all outcomes between immature patients who had standard graft placement and those where the graft was placed distal to the physis. Conclusion: Controversy exists in how best to treat the skeletally immature patient with recurrent lateral patellar instability. Due to the risk of injury to the growth plate, many believe it is best to wait to stabilize these patients until they have stopped growing. However, given the high risk of cartilage injury with each dislocation and the long term sequelae of such injuries in these young knees, the risk of waiting may be high. This study demonstrates similar outcomes and recurrence rates in skeletally immature patients with those seen in the mature population without disturbance or injury to the growth plates. [Figure: see text][Figure: see text]

scholarly journals A Simple Method of Measuring the Distance From the Schöttle Point to the Medial Distal Femoral Physis With MRI

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 232596711984071 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meghan E. Bishop ◽  
Sheena R. Black ◽  
Joseph Nguyen ◽  
Douglas Mintz ◽  
Beth Shubin Stein
Keyword(s):  
Patellar Instability ◽  
Femoral Condyle ◽  
Mpfl Reconstruction ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Skeletally Immature ◽  
Simple Method ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Picture Archiving And Communication ◽  
Femoral Physis ◽  
Recurrent Patellar Instability

Background: Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is the treatment of choice for recurrent patellar instability in the skeletally immature patient. Avoiding the open physes during anatomic MPFL reconstruction is a challenge in this population. Purpose: To describe a novel method using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to determine the distance from the Schöttle point to the medial distal femoral physis among skeletally immature individuals with patellar instability. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: Preoperative MRI scans were analyzed from 34 patients with open distal femoral physes and lateral patellar instability. With the multiplanar reconstruction mode on a picture archiving and communication system (PACS), the location of the Schöttle point was determined according to previously reported distances from the posterior femoral cortical line and the posterior origin of the medial femoral condyle. This location was then extrapolated to the most medial sagittal slice on MRI showing the medial distal femoral physis. The distance was measured from this point to the most distal aspect of the physis. Results: The mean age of the study cohort was 13.6 years (range, 10.6-15.7 years); there were 13 males and 21 females. The mean distance from the medial distal femoral physis to the Schöttle point was 7.27 ± 1.78 mm. The Schöttle point was distal to the medial distal femoral physis in all cases. There was no significant correlation between age and mean distance in either the overall study population ( r = 0.046, P = .798) or when stratified by sex (females, P = .629; males, P = .089). The distance between the Schöttle point and the medial distal femoral physis was shorter for females than for males (6.51 vs 7.71 mm, P = .043). After adjustment for age, females on average were 1.31 mm closer to the Schöttle point than were males ( B = –1.31, P = .041). Conclusion: This technique can be used to determine the distance between the medial distal femoral physis and the Schöttle point. The Schöttle point was distal to the physis in all patients, and it was closer to the physis in skeletally immature females compared with age-matched males. Clinical Relevance: The long-term repercussions of improperly placed MPFL reconstruction include recurrent patellar instability, increased patellofemoral contact pressures and overtensioning of the ligament, and possibly patellofemoral arthritis. The current technique can be used preoperatively to determine the appropriate safe distance for drilling a socket distal to the physis.

Increased Femoral Anteversion Influence Over Surgically Treated Recurrent Patellar Instability Patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 633-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Eduardo Franciozi ◽  
Luiz Felipe Ambra ◽  
Leonardo José Bernardes Albertoni ◽  
Pedro Debieux ◽  
Fernando Cury Rezende ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patellar Instability ◽  
Femoral Anteversion ◽  
Recurrent Patellar Instability
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document