scholarly journals Anatomic Fibular Collateral Ligament Reconstruction

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. e309-e314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilbert Moatshe ◽  
Chase S. Dean ◽  
Jorge Chahla ◽  
Raphael Serra Cruz ◽  
Robert F. LaPrade
Keyword(s):  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Fibular Collateral Ligament

Biomechanical Analysis of an Isolated Fibular (Lateral) Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Using an Autogenous Semitendinosus Graft

2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 1521-1527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin R. Coobs ◽  
Robert F. LaPrade ◽  
Chad J. Griffith ◽  
Bradley J. Nelson
Keyword(s):  
Internal Rotation ◽  
Knee Flexion ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Anatomic Reconstruction ◽  
Ligament Injury ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Fibular Collateral Ligament ◽  
Normal Stability ◽  
Semitendinosus Graft

Background The fibular collateral ligament is the primary stabilizer to varus instability of the knee. Untreated fibular collateral ligament injuries can lead to residual knee instability and can increase the risk of concurrent cruciate ligament reconstruction graft failures. Anatomic reconstructions of the fibular collateral ligament have not been biomechanically validated. Purpose To describe an anatomic fibular collateral ligament reconstruction using an autogenous semitendinosus graft and to test the hypothesis that using this reconstruction technique to treat an isolated fibular collateral ligament injury will restore the knee to near normal stability. Study Design Controlled laboratory study. Methods Ten nonpaired, fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were biomechanically subjected to a 10 N·m varus moment and 5 N·m external and internal rotation torques at 0°, 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion. Testing was performed with an intact and sectioned fibular collateral ligament, and also after an anatomic reconstruction of the fibular collateral ligament with an autogenous semitendinosus graft. Motion changes were assessed with a 6 degree of freedom electromagnetic motion analysis system. Results After sectioning, we found significant increases in varus rotation at 0°, 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90°, external rotation at 60° and 90°, and internal rotation at 0°, 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion. After reconstruction, there were significant decreases in motion in varus rotation at 0°, 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90°, external rotation at 60° and 90°, and internal rotation at 0°, 15°, and 30° of knee flexion. In addition, we observed a full recovery of knee stability in varus rotation at 0°, 60°, and 90°, external rotation at 60° and 90°, and internal rotation at 0° and 30° of knee flexion. Conclusion An anatomic fibular collateral ligament reconstruction restores varus, external, and internal rotation to near normal stability in a knee with an isolated fibular collateral ligament injury. Clinical Significance An anatomic reconstruction of the fibular collateral ligament with an autogenous semitendinosus graft is a viable option to treat nonrepairable acute or chronic fibular collateral ligament tears in patients with varus instability.

Injury to the Popliteal Artery and Vein During Open Fibular Collateral Ligament Reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e19.00666-e19.00666
Author(s):  
William M. Naylor ◽  
Daniel J. Johnson ◽  
Jessica M. Welter ◽  
Albert S.M. Dunn
Keyword(s):  
Popliteal Artery ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Fibular Collateral Ligament

scholarly journals Fibular Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Adolescent Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e141-e145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitchell I. Kennedy ◽  
Ramesses Akamefula ◽  
Nicholas N. DePhillipo ◽  
Catherine A. Logan ◽  
Liam Peebles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Fibular Collateral Ligament ◽  
Adolescent Patients

scholarly journals Risk Factors for Failure After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in a Pediatric Population: A Prediction Algorithm

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 232596712199116
Author(s):  
Nicholas J. Lemme ◽  
Daniel S. Yang ◽  
Brooke Barrow ◽  
Ryan O’Donnell ◽  
Alan H. Daniels ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in pediatric patients is becoming increasingly common. There is growing yet limited literature on the risk factors for revision in this demographic. Purpose: To (1) determine the rate of pediatric revision ACLR in a nationally representative sample, (2) ascertain the associated patient- and injury-specific risk factors for revision ACLR, and (3) examine the differences in the rate and risks of revision ACLR between pediatric and adult patients. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The PearlDiver patient record database was used to identify adult patients (age ≥20 years) and pediatric patients (age <20 years) who underwent primary ACLR between 2010 and 2015. At 5 years postoperatively, the risk of revision ACLR was compared between the adult and pediatric groups. ACLR to the contralateral side was also compared. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the significant risk factors for revision ACLR and the overall reoperation rates in pediatric and adult patients; from these risk factors, an algorithm was developed to predict the risk of revision ACLR in pediatric patients. Results: Included were 2055 pediatric patients, 1778 adult patients aged 20 to 29 years, and 1646 adult patients aged 30 to 39 years who underwent ACLR. At 5 years postoperatively, pediatric patients faced a higher risk of revision surgery when compared with adults (18.0 % vs 9.2% [adults 20-29 years] and 7.1% [adults 30-39 years]; P < .0001), with significantly decreased survivorship of the index ACLR ( P < .0001; log-rank test). Pediatric patients were also at higher risk of undergoing contralateral ACLR as compared with adults (5.8% vs 1.6% [adults 20-29 years] and 1.9% [adults 30-39 years]; P < .0001). Among the pediatric cohort, boys (odds ratio [OR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.63-0.96; P = .0204) and patients >14 years old (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.45-0.86; P = .0035) had a decreased risk of overall reoperation; patients undergoing concurrent meniscal repair (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.43-2.38; P < .0001) or meniscectomy (OR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.72-2.82; P < .0001) had an increased risk of revision surgery. According to the risk algorithm, the highest probability for revision ACLR was in girls <15 years old with concomitant meniscal and medial collateral ligament injury (36% risk of revision). Conclusion: As compared with adults, pediatric patients had an increased likelihood of revision ACLR, contralateral ACLR, and meniscal reoperation within 5 years of an index ACLR. Families of pediatric patients—especially female patients, younger patients, and those with concomitant medial collateral ligament and meniscal injuries—should be counseled on such risks.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document