Applying question answering technology to locating malevolent online content

2007 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 1404-1418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dmitri Roussinov ◽  
José A. Robles-Flores
Keyword(s):  
Question Answering ◽  
Online Content

Searching Online for Methods of Suicide

Crisis ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Christian Ulrich Eriksen ◽  
Flemming Konradsen ◽  
Thilde Vildekilde
Keyword(s):  
Content Analysis ◽  
English Language ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Background Information ◽  
Access To Information ◽  
Online Content ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Search Terms ◽  
Methods Of Suicide

Abstract. Background: Information on methods of suicide is available online, and access to information on methods of suicide appears to contribute to a small but significant proportion of suicides. There is limited documentation of how methods of suicide are being profiled, as well as what content exists in other languages than English. Aim: We aimed to analyze and compare how methods of suicide are profiled on Danish and English-language websites. Method: We applied a categorization and content analysis of websites describing methods of suicide. Sites were retrieved by applying widely used Danish and English-language search terms. Results: A total of 136 English-language websites and 106 Danish-language websites were included for analysis. Websites were more often categorized as prevention or support sites, academic or policy sites, and against suicide sites than dedicated suicide sites (i.e., pro-suicide sites), or information sites. However, information on methods of suicide was available, and 20.1% and 8.9% of the English and Danish-language sites, respectively, suggested that a particular method of suicide was quick, easy, painless, or certain to result in death. Limitations: Only one author coded and analyzed all websites. A further operationalization of the content analysis checklist is warranted to increase reliability. Conclusion: The websites primarily had a prevention or anti-suicide focus, but information on methods of suicide was available, requiring an increased focus on how to diminish the negative effects of harmful online content.

WHY WE SHARE IT – AN INVESTIGATION ABOUT REASONS FOR ACCOUNT SHARING OF ONLINE CONTENT PROVIDERS

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1558-1558
Author(s):  
Gerrit Cziehso ◽  
◽  
Monika Kukar-Kinney ◽  
Joel Mier ◽  
Dennis Tann
Keyword(s):  
Online Content

Reports of the Workshops Held at the 2019 AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

AI Magazine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 67-78
Author(s):  
Guy Barash ◽  
Mauricio Castillo-Effen ◽  
Niyati Chhaya ◽  
Peter Clark ◽  
Huáscar Espinoza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
Cyber Security ◽  
Question Answering ◽  
Intent Recognition ◽  
Affective Content ◽  
Learning Plan ◽  
Dialog System ◽  
Affective Content Analysis ◽  
Games And Simulations

The workshop program of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence’s 33rd Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-19) was held in Honolulu, Hawaii, on Sunday and Monday, January 27–28, 2019. There were fifteen workshops in the program: Affective Content Analysis: Modeling Affect-in-Action, Agile Robotics for Industrial Automation Competition, Artificial Intelligence for Cyber Security, Artificial Intelligence Safety, Dialog System Technology Challenge, Engineering Dependable and Secure Machine Learning Systems, Games and Simulations for Artificial Intelligence, Health Intelligence, Knowledge Extraction from Games, Network Interpretability for Deep Learning, Plan, Activity, and Intent Recognition, Reasoning and Learning for Human-Machine Dialogues, Reasoning for Complex Question Answering, Recommender Systems Meet Natural Language Processing, Reinforcement Learning in Games, and Reproducible AI. This report contains brief summaries of the all the workshops that were held.

Automated question answering in Webclopedia

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulf Hermjakob ◽  
Eduard Hovy ◽  
Chin-Yew Lin
Keyword(s):  
Question Answering

Antibiotic Resistance

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Litman
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Resistance ◽  
Content Distribution ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Copyright Infringement ◽  
Online Content ◽  
30Th Anniversary ◽  
Secure Control ◽  
Highly Effective ◽  
New Entrants ◽  
War Stories

In this essay, written for the 30th Anniversary of Cardozo’s Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, I revisit the ruinous litigation strategy copyright owners pursued after Napster to secure control of the market for personal uses of copyrighted works, which I wrote about ten years ago in War Stories, 20 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J. 337 (2002). The litigation campaign had effects that copyright owners now have reason to regret. Medical experts tell us that powerful antibiotics are highly effective in killing off both good and bad bacteria, but at a significant risk. Bugs that survive the treatment grow bigger, stronger, and resistant to antibiotics. They become much more dangerous because they are harder to kill. Copyright owners’ indiscriminate litigation against new entrants into the entertainment and information marketplace killed off a broad swath of potential competitors and partners. The ones who were left faced a less crowded field because old media had helpfully cleared it for them. The scorched-earth litigation strategy temporarily cleared the field, and made room both for tepid, content-industry-controlled efforts to distribute music, books, and video online, and for new entrants with the stamina and resources to survive copyright infringement suits. Apple, Amazon, and Google took advantage of that environment to grow into dominant distributors who are obligatory partners for any serious online content distribution plan, and who insist on calling the shots on price, format, and other matters that content owners believe should rightfully be under their own control.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document