Drosophila Claspin is required for the G2 arrest that is induced by DNA replication stress but not by DNA double-strand breaks

DNA Repair ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 741-752 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun-Mi Lee ◽  
Tram Thi Bich Trinh ◽  
Hee Jin Shim ◽  
Suk-Young Park ◽  
Trang Thi Thu Nguyen ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3114-3114
Author(s):  
Francesca Cottini ◽  
Teru Hideshima ◽  
Giovanni Tonon ◽  
Kenneth C. Anderson

Abstract Multiple myeloma (MM) is a clonal proliferation of malignant plasma cells, carrying abnormal karyotypes, chromosomal translocations, and innumerous DNA copy-number variations. We and others have previously shown that MM cells have constitutive DNA damage and DNA damage response (DDR), while normal plasma cells (NPCs) are negative for these DDR markers. Moreover, we recently observed that markers of replicative stress, such as p-ATR and p-CHK1 together with RPA foci, are also present in MM cells. The MYC (or c-MYC) oncogene is pervasively altered in MM. Since MYC is associated with DNA replication stress, oxidative stress, and DDR, we explored whether MYC is implicated in these pathways in MM. Indeed, by analyzing various DNA damage gene expression signatures, we found a positive correlation between MYC levels and ongoing DNA damage. We next examined whether MYC modulation could alter replicative stress markers, and induce DNA double-strand breaks. In a gain-of-function model, c-MYC was expressed in U266 MM cell line, which has low c-MYC levels and importantly shows low levels of ongoing DNA damage. In parallel, the H929 and MM.1S MM cell lines were used to knock-down c-MYC expression. Re-expression of a functional MYC-EGFP in U266 cells induced replicative stress markers, such as RAD51, RPA, and phospho-CHK1 foci, as well as increased RAD51, RPA and phospho-CHK1 protein levels. To determine whether this phenotype was linked to concomitant oxidative stress, we incubated MM cells with an antioxidant reagent N-Acetylcysteine (NAC). We observed a modest reduction in replicative markers after NAC treatment, which was more evident by MYC overexpression. Taken together, these results suggest that the replicative stress induced by MYC is, at least in part, associated with oxidative stress. Additionally, MYC-EGFP positive U266 cells also show DNA damage, evidenced by appearance of phospho-H2A.X foci (which detect DNA double strand breaks), that in turn triggers an intense DNA damage response, assessed by phospho-ATM/phospho CHK2 positivity. In contrast, all these DDR markers were downregulated by MYC silencing, prior to cell death, in MM.1S and H929 MM cell lines. Finally, we examined whether targeting the replicative stress response may represent a novel therapeutic strategy in MM cells with high expression of MYC. Specifically, we treated U266 cells transduced with MYC or control LACZ cells, as well as MM.1S and H929 transfected with a specific MYC-shRNA or their scrambled shRNA controls, with a small molecule ATR inhibitor VE-821 which prevents proper DNA repair after DNA damage. Cells overexpressing MYC were significantly more sensitive to VE-821 treatment compared to controls; conversely MYC-silenced cells were more resistant to VE-821. These results suggest the potential utility of VE-821 as a novel therapeutic agent in cells with high expression of MYC. In conclusion, our data show that MYC may exert its oncogenic activity partly through its ability to trigger DNA replication stress, leading to DNA damage and genomic instability in MM cells. Given the pervasive deregulation of MYC present in MM cells, its role in DNA replication and DNA damage may correlate with the extensive genomic rearrangements observed in MM cells. Therefore, treatment strategies targeting this Achilles' heel may improve patient outcome in MM. Disclosures: Hideshima: Acetylon Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Anderson:Acetylon, Oncopep: Scientific Founder, Scientific Founder Other; Celgene, Millennium, BMS, Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Yun-Chia Chang ◽  
Shuhe Tsai ◽  
Maria J. Aristizabal ◽  
James P. Wells ◽  
Yan Coulombe ◽  
...  

Abstract Ectopic R-loop accumulation causes DNA replication stress and genome instability. To avoid these outcomes, cells possess a range of anti-R-loop mechanisms, including RNaseH that degrades the RNA moiety in R-loops. To comprehensively identify anti-R-loop mechanisms, we performed a genome-wide trigenic interaction screen in yeast lacking RNH1 and RNH201. We identified >100 genes critical for fitness in the absence of RNaseH, which were enriched for DNA replication fork maintenance factors including the MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 (MRN) complex. While MRN has been shown to promote R-loops at DNA double-strand breaks, we show that it suppresses R-loops and associated DNA damage at transcription–replication conflicts. This occurs through a non-nucleolytic function of MRE11 that is important for R-loop suppression by the Fanconi Anemia pathway. This work establishes a novel role for MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 in directing tolerance mechanisms at transcription–replication conflicts.


Cell Stress ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 37-39
Author(s):  
Jia Z. Shen ◽  
Charles Spruck

Repetitive elements (REs) are normally transcriptionally silenced in somatic cells by repressive epigenetic modifications, which are thought to include DNA methylation and histone modifications such as deacetylation, H3K9me3, and H4K20me3. Although, it is unclear how RE silencing is maintained through DNA replication cycles in rapidly growing cancer cells. On the other hand, the reactivation of endogenous retroelements beyond a threshold level of tolerance in cancer cells, such as by treatment with DNA demethylating agents or HDAC or LSD1 inhibitors, can induce viral mimicry responses that augment certain cancer therapies, including immunotherapy. However, these agents can also affect normal cells presenting obvious side effects. Therefore, uncovering cancer cell-specific RE silencing mechanisms could provide a basis for the development of a new generation of cancer immunotherapy drugs. In our study (Shen et al. (2020), Cell, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.042), through a high-content RNAi screen we identified FBXO44 as a key regulator of H3K9me3-mediated transcriptional silencing of REs in cancer cells. Inhibition of FBXO44 or its co-factor SUV39H1 stimulated antiviral pathways and interferon (IFN) signaling and induced replication stress and DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in cancer cells, leading to restricted tumor growth and synergy with anti-PD-1 therapy (Figure 1).


Cell Cycle ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 773-782 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsutomu Shimura ◽  
Yasushi Ochiai ◽  
Naoto Noma ◽  
Toshiyuki Oikawa ◽  
Yui Sano ◽  
...  

Science ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 343 (6166) ◽  
pp. 88-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Costantino ◽  
Sotirios K. Sotiriou ◽  
Juha K. Rantala ◽  
Simon Magin ◽  
Emil Mladenov ◽  
...  

In budding yeast, one-ended DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and damaged replication forks are repaired by break-induced replication (BIR), a homologous recombination pathway that requires the Pol32 subunit of DNA polymerase delta. DNA replication stress is prevalent in cancer, but BIR has not been characterized in mammals. In a cyclin E overexpression model of DNA replication stress, POLD3, the human ortholog of POL32, was required for cell cycle progression and processive DNA synthesis. Segmental genomic duplications induced by cyclin E overexpression were also dependent on POLD3, as were BIR-mediated recombination events captured with a specialized DSB repair assay. We propose that BIR repairs damaged replication forks in mammals, accounting for the high frequency of genomic duplications in human cancers.


eLife ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bente Benedict ◽  
Tanja van Harn ◽  
Marleen Dekker ◽  
Simone Hermsen ◽  
Asli Kucukosmanoglu ◽  
...  

In cancer cells, loss of G1/S control is often accompanied by p53 pathway inactivation, the latter usually rationalized as a necessity for suppressing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. However, we found an unanticipated effect of p53 loss in mouse and human G1-checkpoint-deficient cells: reduction of DNA damage. We show that abrogation of the G1/S-checkpoint allowed cells to enter S-phase under growth-restricting conditions at the expense of severe replication stress manifesting as decelerated DNA replication, reduced origin firing and accumulation of DNA double-strand breaks. In this system, loss of p53 allowed mitogen-independent proliferation, not by suppressing apoptosis, but rather by restoring origin firing and reducing DNA breakage. Loss of G1/S control also caused DNA damage and activation of p53 in an in vivo retinoblastoma model. Moreover, in a teratoma model, loss of p53 reduced DNA breakage. Thus, loss of p53 may promote growth of incipient cancer cells by reducing replication-stress-induced DNA damage.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 1103-1142
Author(s):  
Swati Singh ◽  
Veda P. Pandey ◽  
Kusum Yadav ◽  
Anurag Yadav ◽  
U. N. Dwivedi

: Topoisomerases are reported to resolve the topological problems of DNA during several cellular processes, such as DNA replication, transcription, recombination, and chromatin remodeling. Two types of topoisomerases (Topo I and II) accomplish their designated tasks by introducing single- or double-strand breaks within the duplex DNA molecules, and thus maintain the proper structural conditions of DNA to release the topological torsions, which is generated by unwinding of DNA to access coded information, in the course of replication, transcription, and other processes. Both the topoisomerases have been looked at as crucial targets against various types of cancers such as lung, melanoma, breast, and prostate cancers. Conceptually, targeting topoisomerases will disrupt both DNA replication and transcription, thereby leading to inhibition of cell division and consequently stopping the growth of actively dividing cancerous cells. Since the discovery of camptothecin (an alkaloid) as an inhibitor of Topo I in 1958, a number of derivatives of camptothecin were developed as potent inhibitors of Topo I. Two such derivatives of camptothecin, namely, topotecan and irinotecan, have been commonly used as US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved drugs against Topo I. Similarly, the first Topo II inhibitor, namely, etoposide, an analogue of podophyllotoxin, was developed in 1966 and got FDA approval as an anti-cancer drug in 1983. Subsequently, several other inhibitors of Topo II, such as doxorubicin, mitoxantrone, and teniposide, were developed. These drugs have been reported to cause accumulation of cytotoxic non-reversible DNA double-strand breaks (cleavable complex). Thus, the present review describes the anticancer potential of plant-derived secondary metabolites belonging to alkaloids, flavonoids and terpenoids directed against topoisomerases. Furthermore, in view of the recent advances made in the field of computer-aided drug design, the present review also discusses the use of computational approaches such as ADMET, molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulation and QSAR to assess and predict the safety, efficacy, potency and identification of these potent anti-cancerous therapeutic molecules.


2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kasper Fugger ◽  
Wai Kit Chu ◽  
Peter Haahr ◽  
Arne Nedergaard Kousholt ◽  
Halfdan Beck ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document