scholarly journals FBH1 co-operates with MUS81 in inducing DNA double-strand breaks and cell death following replication stress

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kasper Fugger ◽  
Wai Kit Chu ◽  
Peter Haahr ◽  
Arne Nedergaard Kousholt ◽  
Halfdan Beck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks

scholarly journals Loss of p53 suppresses replication-stress-induced DNA breakage in G1/S checkpoint deficient cells

eLife ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bente Benedict ◽  
Tanja van Harn ◽  
Marleen Dekker ◽  
Simone Hermsen ◽  
Asli Kucukosmanoglu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Origin Firing ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Breakage ◽  
Cycle Arrest

In cancer cells, loss of G1/S control is often accompanied by p53 pathway inactivation, the latter usually rationalized as a necessity for suppressing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. However, we found an unanticipated effect of p53 loss in mouse and human G1-checkpoint-deficient cells: reduction of DNA damage. We show that abrogation of the G1/S-checkpoint allowed cells to enter S-phase under growth-restricting conditions at the expense of severe replication stress manifesting as decelerated DNA replication, reduced origin firing and accumulation of DNA double-strand breaks. In this system, loss of p53 allowed mitogen-independent proliferation, not by suppressing apoptosis, but rather by restoring origin firing and reducing DNA breakage. Loss of G1/S control also caused DNA damage and activation of p53 in an in vivo retinoblastoma model. Moreover, in a teratoma model, loss of p53 reduced DNA breakage. Thus, loss of p53 may promote growth of incipient cancer cells by reducing replication-stress-induced DNA damage.

A Role for DNA Double Strand Breaks in the Sensitivity of AML Cells to Clofarabine: Enhanced In Vitro Sensitivity in Primary AML Cells with FLT3 Mutations.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2582-2582
Author(s):  
Monica Pallis ◽  
Martin Grundy ◽  
Claire Seedhouse ◽  
Heather Pimblett ◽  
Nigel Russell
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Mitochondrial Membrane ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Cytochrome C Release ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Flt3 Mutations ◽  
Kg1 Cells

Abstract Clofarabine is a purine nucleoside analogue which has been incorporated into several therapeutic trial protocols for the treatment of leukaemias including acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). The aims of the study are to ascertain mechanisms of clofarabine action in AML using cell lines and presentation samples from patients. We measured apoptosis by TdT assay, cytochrome C release and flow cytometric assays of the mitochondrial membrane potential probe DiOC6. To study the effects of clofarabine on DNA synthesis and DNA double strand breaks, we used bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) and H2AX assays respectively. Equitoxic doses were established that caused approximately 20% cell death in the AML cell lines HL-60 (0.3 μM), KG1 (1 μM) and MV4.11 (1 μM) after 6 hours of continuous exposure. At these doses, clofarabine induced apoptotic DNA nicks, as measured by the TdT assay, and Cytochrome C release in all three cell lines. However, clofarabine-induced mitochondrial hyperpolarisation and depolarisation were found to be cell-type specific, occurring in HL-60 but not MV4.11 or KG1 cells, i.e. mitochondrial membrane depolarisation is not an essential part of the mechanism of clofarabine-induced apoptosis. Following clofarabine treatment, DNA synthesis was reduced by 91% within 1 hour in KG1 cells and by 80% in HL-60, but by only 9% in MV4.11. Out of the three cell lines, MV4.11 cells, which have a FLT3 internal tandem duplication (ITD), were the only ones to completely repair DNA double strand breaks following clofarabine removal. In 12 samples from patients with AML, the proportion of cells which incorporated BrdU in a 45 minute assay - a measure of the rate of cell cycling - differed considerably between samples, from 0.8% to 23%, median 13%. Cell death induced by clofarabine was correlated with the cycling rate of untreated cells (P=0.016). All 12 samples showed inhibition of DNA synthesis within 60 minutes of clofarabine treatment (range 20%–92% inhibition, median 54%). Mitochondrial membrane hyperpolarisation and depolarisation were not observed in patient cells. However, DNA double strand breaks were induced by clofarabine in patient cells. Paradoxically, i.e. in contrast to the results seen with the MV4.11 cell line, toxicity was greatest in samples with a FLT3 mutation (P=0.007). In conclusion, the FLT3 mutant MV4.11 cell line effectively repairs clofarabine-induced double strand breaks. Cell death in patient cells cultured with clofarabine is correlated with the presence of a FLT3 mutation. As we have previously established that AML samples with FLT3 mutations have upregulated DNA repair activity, this paradox might be explained by cycles of attempted DNA repair frustrated by renewed clofarabine incoporation into DNA, thus increasing the toxicity of the drug.

PARP Inhibitor Selectively Induces Cell Death in E2A-Hlf Positive Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2183-2183
Author(s):  
Masatoshi Takagi ◽  
Jiuhua Piao ◽  
Takahiro Kamiya ◽  
Mitsuko Masutani ◽  
Shuki Mizutani
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Biological Effects ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Parp Inhibition ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Daudi Cell ◽  
Increased Sensitivity

Abstract Background: Defects in homologous recombination repair (HRR) have long been known to contribute to genomic instability leading to tumor development. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) exerts various cell biological effects, such as maintenance of genomic stability, energy metabolism and cell death. PARP is indispensable in DNA repair machinery, especially in base excision repair (BER). PARP inhibition convert DNA double strand breaks from DNA single strand breaks induced by alkylating agents. These DNA double strand breaks can be repaired by HRR. Therefore, PARP inhibitor induces synthetic lethality in HRR defective cancer cells. Such lethality was successfully shown in BRCA1 or 2 mutated breast cancers. However, only a limited study has been performed other than breast cancers. Some tumors including hematological malignancies are defective in HRR function leading to a possibility to be sensitized to PARP inhibitor. Methods: Sensitivity to PARP inhibitor was screened using 28 leukemia cell lines. HRR activity was measured by DR-GFP HRR assay. Expression of proteins involves HRR was evaluated by cDNA microarray analysis and western blotting. Results: E2A-HLF positive leukemia showed susceptibility to PARP inhibitor. This experiment suggests that expression of E2A-HLF chimeric messenger RNA sensitize the leukemic cell to PARP inhibitor. To elucidate whether E2A-HLF genuinely sensitize the cell for PARP inhibition, E2A-HLF was transduced into PARP inhibitor resistant Burkitt cell line, Daudi, using retrovirus. Compared with mock infected Daudi cell, E2A-HLF expressed Daudi cell showed increased sensitivity to PARP inhibitor. This experiment suggests that E2A-HLF expressed cell is defective HRR pathway. To test this hypothesis, HRR assay using DR-GFP construct was employed. HRR between the two nonfunctional GFP genes to generate a functional GFP gene can be triggered by transient transfection of the I-SceI expression vector, which introduces a DNA double-strand break (DSB) in one of the two GFP genes. HRR proficiency can be determined by the number of cells expressing the GFP protein. DR-GFP HRR assay exhibited defect of HRR function in E2A-HLF expressed cell. Interestingly, expression of BRCA1 was decreased in E2A-HLF transfected cell, which presumably link with decreased HRR activity. Conclusions: Increased sensitivity to PARP inhibitor in E2A-HLF positive leukemia was caused by decreased HRR activity by E2A-HLF expression. PARP inhibitor will be a novel therapeutic approach for refractory leukemia, especially with E2A-HLF translocation. While PARP inhibitor monotherapy is an attractive proposition for treating such as HRR defective E2A-HLF expressed leukemia, combination of HRR inhibitor will be a universal strategy for various types of leukemia. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Replication stress at microsatellites causes DNA double-strand breaks and break-induced replication

2020 ◽  
Vol 295 (45) ◽  
pp. 15378-15397
Author(s):  
Rujuta Yashodhan Gadgil ◽  
Eric J. Romer ◽  
Caitlin C. Goodman ◽  
S. Dean Rider ◽  
French J. Damewood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Reporter System ◽  
Kinase Gene ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Restriction Cleavage ◽  
Break Induced Replication

Short tandemly repeated DNA sequences, termed microsatellites, are abundant in the human genome. These microsatellites exhibit length instability and susceptibility to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) due to their tendency to form stable non-B DNA structures. Replication-dependent microsatellite DSBs are linked to genome instability signatures in human developmental diseases and cancers. To probe the causes and consequences of microsatellite DSBs, we designed a dual-fluorescence reporter system to detect DSBs at expanded (CTG/CAG)n and polypurine/polypyrimidine (Pu/Py) mirror repeat structures alongside the c-myc replication origin integrated at a single ectopic chromosomal site. Restriction cleavage near the (CTG/CAG)100 microsatellite leads to homology-directed single-strand annealing between flanking AluY elements and reporter gene deletion that can be detected by flow cytometry. However, in the absence of restriction cleavage, endogenous and exogenous replication stressors induce DSBs at the (CTG/CAG)100 and Pu/Py microsatellites. DSBs map to a narrow region at the downstream edge of the (CTG)100 lagging-strand template. (CTG/CAG)n chromosome fragility is repeat length–dependent, whereas instability at the (Pu/Py) microsatellites depends on replication polarity. Strikingly, restriction-generated DSBs and replication-dependent DSBs are not repaired by the same mechanism. Knockdown of DNA damage response proteins increases (Rad18, polymerase (Pol) η, Pol κ) or decreases (Mus81) the sensitivity of the (CTG/CAG)100 microsatellites to replication stress. Replication stress and DSBs at the ectopic (CTG/CAG)100 microsatellite lead to break-induced replication and high-frequency mutagenesis at a flanking thymidine kinase gene. Our results show that non-B structure–prone microsatellites are susceptible to replication-dependent DSBs that cause genome instability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document