The effects of exact exchange of density functionals on the evaluation of second hyperpolarizabilities of streptocyanines using sum-over-states method

2016 ◽  
Vol 1085 ◽  
pp. 40-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Wang ◽  
Yizhong Yuan ◽  
Xiaohui Tian ◽  
Jinyu Sun ◽  
Jianyong Yuan
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (35) ◽  
pp. 19558-19570
Author(s):  
Robert C. Chapleski ◽  
Alexander S. Ivanov ◽  
Kirk A. Peterson ◽  
Vyacheslav S. Bryantsev

Density functionals with high exact exchange (EHFX ≥ 50%) show the best agreement with CCSD(T)-DKH2 Am(iii)/Eu(iii) selectivities and MP2-DKH2 distances.


2018 ◽  
Vol 117 (9-12) ◽  
pp. 1226-1241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin G. Janesko ◽  
Giovanni Scalmani ◽  
Michael J. Frisch

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 4793-4801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin G. Janesko

PBE calculations, performed non-self-consistently on densities evaluated with Rung 3.5 density functionals, give improved performance for hydrogen transfer reaction barriers.


1989 ◽  
Vol 86 ◽  
pp. 853-859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Moscardó ◽  
José Pérez-Jordá ◽  
Emilio San-Fabián

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 101
Author(s):  
Ian Shuttleworth

A comparative study of the unreacted and reacted uniaxially strained Pt(111) and the layered (111)-Pt/Ni/Pt3Ni and (111)-Pt/Ni/PtNi3 surfaces has been performed using density functional theory (DFT). An in-depth study of the unreacted surfaces has been performed to evaluate the importance of geometric, magnetic and ligand effects in determining the reactivity of these different Pt surfaces. An analysis of the binding energies of oxygen and hydrogen over the high-symmetry binding positions of all surfaces has been performed. The study has shown that O and H tend to bind more strongly to the (111)-Pt/Ni/Pt3Ni surface and less strongly to the (111)-Pt/Ni/PtNi3 surface compared to binding on the equivalently strained Pt(111) surfaces. Changes in the surface magnetisation of the surfaces overlaying the ferromagnetic alloys during adsorption are discussed, as well as the behaviour of the d-band centre across all surfaces, to evaluate the potential mechanisms for these differences in binding. An accompanying comparison of the accessible density functionals has been included to estimate the error in the computational binding energies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document