scholarly journals Seismic response of a rocking bridge column using a precast hybrid fiber-reinforced concrete (HyFRC) tube

2017 ◽  
Vol 174 ◽  
pp. 252-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilson Nguyen ◽  
William Trono ◽  
Marios Panagiotou ◽  
Claudia P. Ostertag
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Seismic Response ◽  
Fiber Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Hybrid Fiber ◽  
Bridge Column

scholarly journals A review on hybrid fiber reinforced concrete pavements technology

2021 ◽  
Vol 1895 (1) ◽  
pp. 012053
Author(s):  
Hadeel M. Shakir ◽  
Ahmed Farhan Al-Tameemi ◽  
Adel A. Al-Azzawi
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Fiber Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Concrete Pavements ◽  
Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Hybrid Fiber

Experimental Study of Bending Toughness on Hybrid Fiber Reinforced Concrete

2013 ◽  
Vol 327 ◽  
pp. 201-204
Author(s):  
Jin Song Shi ◽  
Bo Yuan ◽  
Da Zhang Wang ◽  
Zhe An Lu
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Fiber Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Bending Test ◽  
Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Hybrid Fiber ◽  
Toughness Index ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Loading Methods ◽  
Index Value

In order to investigate the difference of current toughness index standards for fiber reinforced concrete, two main groups of specimens were made to take bending toughness test with the requirements of corresponded standards, loading methods and loading speeds, which are ASTM C1018 in America, ACI 544 and JSCE G552 in Japan. United with software Origin, the load-deflection curves gathered from bending test was calculated with relative standards. The results show that the calculated toughness index value with ASTM C1018-98 in America is more accurate with three grades but the requested deflection of testing is much longer than others while ACI 544 and JSCE G552 in Japan are quite the contrary.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document