Integration of electroplating process design and operation for simultaneous productivity maximization, energy saving, and freshwater minimization

2012 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 202-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaowei Liu ◽  
Chuanyu Zhao ◽  
Qiang Xu
Keyword(s):  
Energy Saving ◽  
Process Design ◽  
Electroplating Process

Applications of Efficient Energy-Saving Cement Grinding Technology and Equipment

2010 ◽  
Vol 148-149 ◽  
pp. 363-367
Author(s):  
Jian Tian ◽  
Xiao Yu Zhao ◽  
Jin Di Wang ◽  
Tao Wei
Keyword(s):  
Energy Saving ◽  
Process Design ◽  
Low Noise ◽  
High Productivity ◽  
Efficient Energy ◽  
Low Energy Consumption ◽  
Domestic Energy ◽  
Cement Grinding ◽  
Grinding System ◽  
Development Prospects

Joint grinding system is the preferred cement grinding system of current cement process design, the advantages are high productivity, low energy consumption of system and low noise, etc. It meets the industrial policy of domestic energy-saving and reduction emission, so the development prospects is broad.

scholarly journals Energy Saving in Processes Using Simple Thermodynamic Models of Utilities

1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petr Stehlík ◽  
Aleš Fiaia ◽  
Zdeněk Hajný
Keyword(s):  
Energy Saving ◽  
Flue Gas ◽  
Process Design ◽  
Gas Turbines ◽  
Heat Recovery ◽  
Emissions Reduction ◽  
Steam Turbines ◽  
Thermodynamic Models ◽  
Heating And Cooling ◽  
Steam Boilers

Maximizing heat recovery in the heat exchanger network has to be considered as one of basic steps in a process design. Heating and cooling duties not serviced by heat recovery must be provided by external utilities. Simple thermodynamic models of various types of utilities (furnaces, steam boilers, steam turbines, gas turbines) are described in this paper. These models provide us with a tool for the analysis of utilities selection (provided the process heat and power demand are given), enable us to evaluate fuel burnt, power generated, costs for fuel and for exported/imported power and emissions (CO2, SO2) flowrates on a “local” or a “global” basis. This approach is convenient at the targeting stage of a design and can contribute to a substantial energy saving and flue gas emissions reduction.

Subjective Time Preference and Willingness to Pay for an Energy-Saving Durable Good

2001 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 133-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerrit Antonides ◽  
Sophia R. Wunderink
Keyword(s):  
Willingness To Pay ◽  
Energy Saving ◽  
Subjective Time ◽  
Durable Good ◽  
Discount Function ◽  
Hyperbolic Discount ◽  
The One ◽  
Two Parameter ◽  
Difference Effect ◽  
Better Than

Summary: Different shapes of individual subjective discount functions were compared using real measures of willingness to accept future monetary outcomes in an experiment. The two-parameter hyperbolic discount function described the data better than three alternative one-parameter discount functions. However, the hyperbolic discount functions did not explain the common difference effect better than the classical discount function. Discount functions were also estimated from survey data of Dutch households who reported their willingness to postpone positive and negative amounts. Future positive amounts were discounted more than future negative amounts and smaller amounts were discounted more than larger amounts. Furthermore, younger people discounted more than older people. Finally, discount functions were used in explaining consumers' willingness to pay for an energy-saving durable good. In this case, the two-parameter discount model could not be estimated and the one-parameter models did not differ significantly in explaining the data.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document