scholarly journals Protein quality and quantity influence the effect of dietary fat on weight gain and tissue partitioning via host-microbiota changes

Cell Reports ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 109093
Author(s):  
Oleksandr Nychyk ◽  
Wiley Barton ◽  
Agata M. Rudolf ◽  
Serena Boscaini ◽  
Aaron Walsh ◽  
...  
2004 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 803-812 ◽  
Author(s):  
C L Mosca ◽  
J A Marshall ◽  
G K Grunwald ◽  
M A Cornier ◽  
J Baxter

Obesity ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 967-976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison E. Field ◽  
Walter C. Willett ◽  
Lauren Lissner ◽  
Graham A. Colditz
Keyword(s):  

Obesity ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph E. Donnelly ◽  
Debra K. Sullivan ◽  
Bryan K. Smith ◽  
Dennis J. Jacobsen ◽  
Richard A. Washburn ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 1213-1217 ◽  
Author(s):  
B L Heitmann ◽  
L Lissner ◽  
T I Sørensen ◽  
C Bengtsson

2002 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoe S Warwick ◽  
Steven J Synowski ◽  
Kimberly R Bell

2001 ◽  
Vol 280 (6) ◽  
pp. R1680-R1687 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Renee Commerford ◽  
Michael J. Pagliassotti ◽  
Christopher L. Melby ◽  
Yuren Wei ◽  
James O. Hill

Obesity results from positive energy balance and, perhaps, abnormalities in lipid and glycogen metabolism. The purpose of this study was to determine whether differences in lipogenesis, retention of dietary fat, and/or glycogenesis influenced susceptibility to dietary obesity. After 1 wk of free access to a high-fat diet (HFD; 45% fat by energy) rats were separated on the basis of 1 wk body weight gain into obesity-prone (OP; ≥48 g) or obesity-resistant groups (OR; ≤40 g). Rats were either studied at this time (OR1, OP1) or continued on the HFD for an additional 4 wk (OR5, OP5). Weight gain and energy intake were greater ( P ≤ 0.05) in OP vs. OR at both 1 (53 ± 2 vs. 34 ± 1 g; 892 ± 27 vs. 755 ± 14 kcal) and 5 (208 ± 7 vs. 170 ± 7 g; 4,484 ± 82 vs. 4,008 ± 72 kcal) wk, respectively. Rats were injected with 3H2O and were either provided free access to an HFD meal containing labeled fatty acids (fed; n = 10 or 11/group) or were fasted ( n = 10/group) overnight. The amount of food or 14C tracer eaten overnight was equivalent between OP and OR rats. In liver, the fraction of 3H retained in glycogen or lipid was not significantly different between OR and OP groups. Retention of dietary fat in the liver was not increased in OP rats. In adipose tissue, retention of3H was ∼49% greater ( P ≤ 0.05) in OP1 vs. OR1 and ∼30% greater in OP5 vs. OR5, but retention of dietary fat was not elevated in OP vs. OR. At the same time, fat pad weight (sum of epididymal, retroperitoneal, mesenteric) was 49% greater in OP1 rats vs. OR1 rats and 65% greater in OP5 vs. OR5 rats ( P ≤ 0.05). Thus a greater capacity for lipogenesis or retention of dietary fat does not appear to be included in the OP phenotype. The characteristic increase in energy intake associated with OP rats appears to be necessary and critical to accelerated weight and fat gain.


1977 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 1130-1131 ◽  
Author(s):  
NANCY L. CANOLTY ◽  
L. J. KOONG
Keyword(s):  

1992 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 585-596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoe S. Warwick ◽  
Susan S. Schiffman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document