scholarly journals Effect of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Left Ventricular Geometry

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. S49
Author(s):  
Komal Safdar ◽  
Adam Magier ◽  
Vien Truong ◽  
Cheryl Bartone ◽  
Gregory Egnaczyk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Geometry ◽  
Ventricular Geometry ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve

scholarly journals More in, better out? Successful valve-in-valve procedure of an iatrogenic ventricular septal defect following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus-Dieter Hönemann ◽  
Steffen Hofmann ◽  
Frank Ritter ◽  
Gerold Mönnig
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Ventricular Septal Defect ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Septal Defect ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Heart Team ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
Valve In Valve

Abstract Background A rare, but serious, complication following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is the occurrence of an iatrogenic ventricular septal defect (VSD). Case summary We describe a case of an 80-year-old female who was referred with severe aortic stenosis for TAVR. Following thorough evaluation, the heart team consensus was to proceed with implantation via a transapical approach of an ACURATE neo M 25 mm valve (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA). The valve was deployed harnessing transoesophageal echocardiographic (TOE) guidance under rapid pacing with post-dilation. Directly afterwards a very high VSD close to the aortic annulus was detected. As the patient was haemodynamically stable, the procedure was ended. The next day another TOE revealed a shunt volume (left-to-right ventricle) between 50% and 60%. Because the defect was partly located between the stent struts of the ACURATE valve decision was made to fix this leakage with implantation of a further valve and we chose an EVOLUT Pro 29 mm (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). The valve-in-valve was implanted 2–3 mm below the lower edge of the first valve, more towards the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) with excellent result: VSD was reduced to a very small residual shunt without any hemodynamic relevance. Discussion We suggest that an iatrogenic VSD located near the annulus may be treated percutaneously in a bail-out situation with implantation of a second valve that should be implanted slightly more into the LVOT to cover the VSD.

Abstract 16138: Validation of a Non-invasive Approach for the Assessment of Left Ventricular-arterial Coupling Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emad Mogadam ◽  
David Shavelle ◽  
Jing Liu ◽  
Gregory Giesler ◽  
Ray Matthews ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Systolic Function ◽  
Aortic Pressure ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Arterial Elastance ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve

Introduction: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an established treatment for patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS). Ventriculoarterial (LV-arterial) coupling defined as the ratio of total arterial elastance (Ea) to left ventricular end-systolic elastance (Ees) reflects effective cardiac energetics and is a well-accepted index for quantification of LV-arterial coupling. Despite its usefulness, estimating Ees/Ea has technical difficulties. Intrinsic Frequency (IF) method is a noninvasive and single waveform system-based approach for quantification of LV-arterial coupling. The objective of this study was to compare IF variables with Ea/Ees in predicting optimum LV-arterial energetics following TAVR. Method: Twenty-eight patients with severe AS, undergoing TAVR were included. Mean age was 85±4, 53% male with mean ejection fraction 59±6.4. IFs during systole (ω1), diastole (ω2), and total IF variation (Δω=ω1-ω2) were computed from the ascending aortic pressure waveforms at baseline and following TAVR. Ea/Ees was computed using single-beat technique proposed by Takeuchi et al. ( Circulation . 1991;83(1):202-212). Results: There was a significant decrease in Ea/Ees (p<0.001) toward optimum coupling immediately after TAVR (Figure 1a). There was a statistically significant correlation between Ea/Ees and Δω (r= 0.68, p<0.01) (Figure 1b). Conclusion: IF appears to be an accurate and reliable index for quantification of LV-arterial coupling given significant concordance with Ea/Ees. The management of patients with acutely altered hemodynamic states post TAVR can benefit from the assessment of LV-arterial coupling. Since IFs can be measured noninvasively using hand-held devices (e.g. an iPhone), this approach should broaden the clinical applicability of this useful parameter for assessing systolic function, therapeutic response and ventricular-arterial interaction post TAVR.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document