scholarly journals Results of a Prospective Randomized, Open-Label, Noninferiority Study of Tbo-Filgrastim (Granix) versus Filgrastim (Neupogen) in Combination with Plerixafor for Autologous Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients with Multiple Myeloma and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
pp. 2065-2069 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pavan Kumar Bhamidipati ◽  
Mark A. Fiala ◽  
Brenda J. Grossman ◽  
John F. DiPersio ◽  
Keith Stockerl-Goldstein ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2142-2142
Author(s):  
Morie A Gertz ◽  
Robert Wolf ◽  
Ivana N. Micallef ◽  
Dennis A. Gastineau

Abstract Abstract 2142 Poster Board II-119 High-dose chemotherapy in conjunction with autologous SCT is the preferred treatment of relapsed Hodgkin disease and non-Hodgkin lymphoma and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Failure to achieve optimal stem cell mobilization results in multiple subsequent attempts, which consumes large amounts of growth factors and potentially requires antibiotics and transfusions. We retrospectively reviewed the natural history of stem cell mobilization attempts at our institution from 2001 through 2007 to determine the frequency of suboptimal mobilization in patients with hematologic malignancy undergoing autologous transplant and analyzed the subsequent resource utilization in patients with initially failed attempts. Of 1,775 patients undergoing mobilization during the study period, stem cell collection (defined by the number of CD34+ cells/kg) was “ optimal” (≥5×106) in 53%, “low” (≥2 to 5×106) in 25%,“ poor” (<2×106) in 10%, and “failed” (<10 CD34+ cells/mL) in 12%. In the 47% of collections that were less than optimal, increased resource consumption included increased use of growth factors and antibiotics, subsequent chemotherapy mobilization, increased transfusional support, more apheresis procedures, and more frequent hospitalization. Other costs often omitted include the need for hospitalization, which was seen in 5% to 11% of the patients in our study. Parenteral antibiotics were needed when fever developed in 7% of patients with Hodgkin disease, 4% with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and 24% with multiple myeloma who underwent mobilization using a chemotherapy pulse. When stem cell mobilization was not immediately optimal, subsequent attempts to mobilize failed completely in 3 of 42 patients (7%) with Hodgkin disease (3% of the original Hodgkin disease cohort), 56 of 157 (36%) with multiple myeloma (6% of the original myeloma cohort), and 50 of 328 (15%) with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (7% of the original non-Hodgkin lymphoma cohort). These usually unappreciated costs of stem cell mobilization failure highlight the need for more effective mobilization strategies. Disclosures: Gertz: genzyme: Research Funding.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 1179545X1879225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia El Rahi ◽  
James Eldin Cox ◽  
Romelia May ◽  
George Carrum ◽  
Gloria Obi Anyadike ◽  
...  

Background: When used for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization, plerixafor was originally recommended to be administered 11 hours prior to apheresis based on the peak effect of 10 to 14 hours translating into an administration time of 10 to 11 pm. Reports of post-plerixafor anaphylactic reactions mandated labeling change by the Food and Drug Administration with recommendation of monitoring patients after administration. Based on data suggesting sustained plerixafor activity at 18 hours, we changed our administration time to 4 pm at our center. Objective: The objective of this study is to compare the stem cell collection efficiency before and after the practice change at our institution. Methods: A retrospective chart review for patients with multiple myeloma, Hodgkin lymphoma, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma who received a plerixafor-containing mobilization regimen was conducted. The primary end point was the percentage of patients achieving the minimal CD34+ cell goal in ⩽2 apheresis days. The secondary end points included the percentage of patients achieving the preferred CD34+ cell goal in ⩽2 apheresis days, days of apheresis, total CD34+ cells Collected, and engraftment time. Results: A total of 208 patients (4 pm group n = 68, 10 pm group n = 140) with multiple myeloma (n = 112), Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 10), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 86) were included in the analysis. About 91% and 89% ( P = .804) of the patients in the 4 and 10 pm groups, respectively, collected minimum cell dose. Preferred CD34+ cell goal was achieved in 57% and 53% of patients in the 4 and 10 pm groups, respectively. Conclusions: Late afternoon administration of plerixafor provides efficient stem cell mobilization.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 515-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gayatri Setia ◽  
Nabil Hagog ◽  
Bita Jalilizeinali ◽  
Sharon Funkhouser ◽  
Loretta Pierzchanowski ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: TG-0054 (burixafor) is a potent and selective antagonist of human chemokine receptor CXCR4 that inhibits the binding of stromal-derived factor 1 (SDF-1). Interruption of the CXCR4/SDF-1 interaction prevents sequestration of CD34+ stem cells to the bone marrow and subsequently mobilizes these cells into the peripheral blood within 1 to 3 hours of drug administration. Materials and Methods: An open-label, phase II pilot trial was conducted in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), or Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) to evaluate the safety and stem cell mobilization of TG-0054 in combination with G-CSF. We planned to treat twelve patients with subcutaneous injections of 10 µg/kg/day G-CSF in the afternoon for 4 days. On the morning of Day 5, patients received 3.14 mg/kg TG-0054 and underwent large volume (18-24L) leukapheresis approximately 2 hours post-drug infusion. Patients were allowed by protocol to undergo leukapheresis for 1-5 days to obtain the predetermined target of ≥5.0 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg. 9 of 12 patients have been treated thus far with a plan to treat 3 additional patients. Results: A planned interim analysis revealed that6 of the 9 patients treated thus far collected more than 10 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg in 1 leukapheresis session. 2 patients required 2 days to achieve the study endpoint, and 1 outlier patient who had received Revlimid only 1 week prior to peripheral blood CD34 analysis failed to mobilize stem cells until he was allowed 2 more weeks to recover from his Revlimid treatment. Burixafor was well tolerated, and there were no adverse events that were attributed to the drug. All of the patients engrafted promptly after melphalan (7 patients) or BEAM (2 patients) conditioning regimens. Conclusion: Burixafor in combination with G-CSF is a potent and well-tolerated mobilizer of stem cells into the peripheral blood, and with the exception of 1 outlier, was able to mobilize >5.0 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg in 1-2 leukapheresis sessions in all patients treated thus far (median 1 day). This contrasts with our historical controls that required a median of 2-3 days to achieve a collection of ≥5.0 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg. A total of 12 patients will be treated on this pilot study. These encouraging results warrant the further testing of this drug in a larger randomized clinical trial. Disclosures Hsu: Taigen Biotechnology: Employment. Chang:Taigen Biotechnology: Employment. Schuster:Taigen Biotechnology: Research Funding.


2015 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 1189-1190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Iliff ◽  
Clint Divine ◽  
Francisco Diaz ◽  
Omar Aljitawi ◽  
Sunil Abhayankar ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1932-1932
Author(s):  
Florent Malard ◽  
Nicolaus Kröger ◽  
Ian H Gabriel ◽  
Kai Hübel ◽  
Jane F. Apperley ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1932 High dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an effective treatment for patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and multiple myeloma (MM). At present, G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) are the preferred stem cell source for autologous HSCT. Fludarabine and lenalidomide are essential drugs in the front line treatment of NHL and MM respectively. Data suggests that fludarabine and lenalidomide therapy may have a deleterious effect on stem cell mobilization. Prior to the drug approval in Europe, a plerixafor compassionate use program (CUP) was available from July 2008 to August 2010 to provide access to the drug for patients with MM or lymphoma who had previously failed a mobilization attempt, and who were not eligible for another specific plerixafor trial. In the European CUP, 48 patients (median age 57 years; range, 36–69), previously treated with fludarabine (median 5 cycles; range, 1–7 cycles) were given plerixafor plus G-CSF for remobilization following a primary mobilisation attempt. All 48 patients had a diagnosis of NHL. The overall median number of CD34+ cells collected was 2.3×106 /Kg (range, 0.3–13.4). The minimum required number of CD34+ cells (≥2.0×106 per kg) was collected from 58% of patients, while only 3 patients (6%) collected ≥5.0×106 CD34+ cells. The collection target of 2.0×106/Kg was reached in a median of 2 apheresis sessions (range, 1–3). Thirty-five patients (median age 57 years; range, 34–66), previously treated with lenalidomide (median 5 cycles; range, 1–10 cycles) were given plerixafor plus G-CSF for remobilization. All patients the 35 patients had MM. The overall median number of CD34+ cells collected was 3.4×106/Kg (range, 1.1–14.8). The minimum required number of CD34+ cells (≥2.0×106 per kg) was collected from 69% of patients, including 12 patients (34%) who were able to collect ≥5.0×106 cells/Kg. In the Len group, 7 patients (20%) had received a prior autologous HSCT before salvage mobilization with plerixafor. Both targets were reached with a median of 2 apheresis sessions (range, 1–4). In conclusion, salvage mobilization with plerixafor plus G-CSF is successful in the majority of patients with MM previously treated with lenalidomide. In fludarabine-exposed patients, only 58% of patients will achieve successful salvage mobilization with plerixafor plus G-CSF, suggesting the need for large prospective studies evaluating the efficacy of plerixafor for frontline mobilization in this subgroup of patients.Table 1.Study population characteristicsCharacteristic (%)Fludarabine (N=48)Lenalidomide (N=35)Patient age, median (range)57 (36–69)57 (34–66)Patient gender    Male26 (54)18 (51)    Female22 (46)17 (42)Fludarabine or Lenalidomide cycles, median (range)5 (1–7)5 (1–10)Diagnosis and disease statusIndolent NHL48 (100)0 (0)Multiple myeloma0 (0)35 (100)Previous chemotherapy: number of lines, median (range)3 (1–6)4 (1–9)Previous autograft    Yes07 (20)    No43 (90)20 (57)    Data missing5 (10)8 (23)Radiotherapy    Yes5 (10)3 (9)    No36 (75)24 (68)    Data missing7 (15)8 (23)Mobilization strategy with plerixafor    Steady-state GCSF mobilization38 (79)27 (77)    Chemotherapy+GCSF mobilization10 (21)8 (23)No. of patients collected44 (92)34 (97)CD34+ cells collected per Kg, median (range)2.3 (0.3–13.4)3.4 (1.1–14.8)No. of patients who reached ≥ 2.106 CD34+28 (58)24 (69)No. of apheresis days to reach ≥ 2.106 CD34+2 (1–3)2 (1–4)No. of patients who reached ≥ 5.106 CD34+3 (6)12 (34)No. of apheresis days to reach ≥ 5.106 CD34+2 (1–3)2 (1–3)NHL, non-Hodgkin lymphoma Disclosures: Mohty: Genzyme: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document