Ilio-sacral screw pelvic fixation when correcting spinal deformities with or without pelvic obliquity: our experience over 40 years

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Dubousset ◽  
Mathilde Gaume ◽  
Lotfi Miladi
2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol Hasler ◽  
Reinald Brunner ◽  
Alon Grundshtein ◽  
Dror Ovadia

Introduction Progressive neuromuscular spinal deformities with pelvic obliquity and loss of sitting balance are typical features of severely affected patients with cerebral palsy. The pelvis represents the key bone between the spine and the lower extremity when it comes to deciding whether and when to operate and if spine or hip surgery first is beneficial. The pelvis can be looked at as the lowest vertebra and as the rooftop of the lower extremities. Biomechanical considerations To allow for a normal spinal shape, the pelvis needs to be horizontal in the frontal plane and mildly anterior tilted in the sagittal plane, less for sitting and more for standing. Any abnormal pelvic position requires spinal compensation and challenges the equilibrium control of the individual. Both anatomical neighbourhoods – the spine and the hip joints — have to be considered when spinal deformities, hip instability and contractures evolve, in conservative therapy (bracing, physiotherapy, seating in the wheelchair) and when surgical interventions are weighed out against each other. Surgical considerations Multiple anatomical factors such as sagittal profile and pelvic orientiation, pelvic transverse plane asymmetries and lumbosacral malformations have to be considered in case the pelvis is instrumented with sacral and iliac screws. Rotational deformities and asymmetries of the pelvic bones make the safe insertion of long screws challenging. Advantages of primary pelvic fixation include correction of pelvic obliquity, especially considering the lever arm of the whole spinal construct. The risk of revision surgery due to progression of distal curves is also reduced. Disadvantages of pelvic fixation include the complexity of the additional intervention, which may result in longer operating times, increased risk of blood loss, infection and hardware malpositioning.


2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 163-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Bouyer ◽  
Manon Bachy ◽  
Redoine Zahi ◽  
Camille Thévenin-Lemoine ◽  
Pierre Mary ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. S202-S203
Author(s):  
Vishal Sarwahi ◽  
Jesse M. Galina ◽  
Beverly Thornhill ◽  
Kathleen Maguire ◽  
Sayyida S. Hasan ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Tianyuan Zhang ◽  
Hongda Bao ◽  
Shibin Shu ◽  
Zhen Liu ◽  
Xu Sun ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE Sacral agenesis (SA) is a rare congenital malformation of the spine. There has been a paucity of clinical research to investigate the surgical outcome of spinopelvic fixation in these patients. In this study, the authors aimed to evaluate the outcome of different distal fixation anchors in lumbosacral spinal deformities associated with SA and to determine the optimal distal fixation anchor. METHODS Patients with diagnoses of SA and lumbosacral scoliosis undergoing spinopelvic fixation with S1 screws, iliac screws, or S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screws were analyzed. The main curve, coronal balance distance, and pelvic obliquity were compared at baseline, postoperatively, and during follow-up in three groups. The complications were also recorded. RESULTS A total of 24 patients were included: 8 patients were stratified into group 1 (S1 screws), 9 into group 2 (iliac screws), and 7 into group 3 (S2AI screws). The main curves were well corrected postoperatively (p < 0.05) in all groups. Coronal balance showed a tendency of deterioration during follow-up in patients with S1 screws (from 18.8 mm to 27.0 mm). Regarding pelvic obliquity, patients with both iliac and S2AI screws showed significant correction (from 3.7° to 2.3° and from 3.3° to 1.6°). Implant-related complications were rod breakage in 3 patients and infection in 1 patient in group 2, and no implant-related complications were observed in group 3. There were 3 cases of unilateral S1 pedicle screw misplacement in group 1. CONCLUSIONS Spinopelvic fixation is a safe and effective procedure that can achieve coronal correction in lumbosacral scoliosis associated with SA. Compared with S1 and iliac screws, S2AI screws as distal fixation anchors can achieve a more satisfactory correction with fewer implant-related complications.


2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 672-685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean M. Jones-Quaidoo ◽  
Scott Yang ◽  
Vincent Arlet

Cerebral palsy (CP) spinal deformities encompass a spectrum of deformities that are often initially treated nonoperatively, only to result in progression of scoliotic curves and further morbidity. Various surgical interventions have been devised to address the progressive curvature of the spine. This endeavor cannot be taken lightly and at times can be encumbered by prior treatments such as the use of baclofen pumps or dorsal rhizotomies. Care of these patients requires a multidisciplinary approach and comprehensive preoperative and postoperative management, including nutritional status, orthopedic assessment of functional level with specific emphasis on the hips and pelvic obliquity, and wheelchair modifications. The surgical techniques in CP scoliosis have progressively evolved from the classic Luque-Galveston fixation methods, the use of unit rods, and lately the use of pedicle screws, to modern sacropelvic fixation. With the latter method, the spinal deformity in patients with CP can usually be almost completely corrected.


2020 ◽  
Vol 102-B (2) ◽  
pp. 261-267
Author(s):  
Niklas Tøndevold ◽  
Markus Lastikka ◽  
Thomas Andersen ◽  
Martin Gehrchen ◽  
Ilkka Helenius

Aims It is uncertain whether instrumented spinal fixation in nonambulatory children with neuromuscular scoliosis should finish at L5 or be extended to the pelvis. Pelvic fixation has been shown to be associated with up to 30% complication rates, but is regarded by some as the standard for correction of deformity in these conditions. The incidence of failure when comparing the most caudal level of instrumentation, either L5 or the pelvis, using all-pedicle screw instrumentation has not previously been reported. In this retrospective study, we compared nonambulatory patients undergoing surgery at two centres: one that routinely instrumented to L5 and the other to the pelvis. Methods In all, 91 nonambulatory patients with neuromuscular scoliosis were included. All underwent surgery using bilateral, segmental, pedicle screw instrumentation. A total of 40 patients underwent fusion to L5 and 51 had their fixation extended to the pelvis. The two groups were assessed for differences in terms of clinical and radiological findings, as well as complications. Results The main curve (MC) was a mean of 90° (40° to 141°) preoperatively and 46° (15° to 82°) at two-year follow-up in the L5 group, and 82° (33° to 116°) and 19° (1° to 60°) in the pelvic group (p < 0.001 at follow-up). Correction of MC and pelvic obliquity (POB) were statistically greater in the pelvic group (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the operating time, blood loss, or complications. Loss of MC correction (> 10°) was more common in patients fixated to the pelvis (23% vs 3%; p = 0.032), while loss of pelvic obliquity correction was more frequent in the L5 group (25% vs 0%; p = 0.007). Risk factors for loss of correction (either POB or MC) included preoperative coronal imbalance (> 50 mm, odds ratio (OR) 11.5, 95%confidence interval (CI) 2.0 to 65; p = 0.006) and postoperative sagittal imbalance (> 25 mm, OR 11.0, 95% CI1.9 to 65; p = 0.008). Conclusion We found that patients undergoing pelvic fixation had a greater correction of MC and POB. The rate of complications was not different. Preoperative coronal and postoperative sagittal imbalance were associated with increased risks of loss of correction, regardless of extent of fixation. Therefore, we recommend pelvic fixation in all nonambulatory children with neuromuscular scoliosis where coronal or sagittal imbalance are present preoperatively. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(2):261–267.


2015 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Jose Paz-Ibarra ◽  
Sofia Saenz ◽  
Natali Jauregui ◽  
Marialejandra Delgado ◽  
Jose Somocurcio

2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
L. P. Hwi ◽  
J. W. Ting

Cecil Cameron Ewing (1925-2006) was a lecturer and head of ophthalmology at the University of Saskatchewan. Throughout his Canadian career, he was an active researcher who published several articles on retinoschisis and was the editor of the Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology. For his contributions to Canadian ophthalmology, the Canadian Ophthalmological Society awarded Ewing a silver medal. Throughout his celebrated medical career, Ewing maintained his passion for music. His love for music led him to be an active member in choir, orchestra, opera and chamber music in which he sang and played the piano, violin and viola. He was also the director of the American Liszt Society and a member for over 40 years. The connection between music and ophthalmology exists as early as the 18th Century. John Taylor (1703-1772) was an English surgeon who specialized in eye diseases. On the one hand, Taylor was a scientist who contributed to ophthalmology by publishing books on ocular physiology and diseases, and by advancing theories of strabismus. On the other hand, Taylor was a charlatan who traveled throughout Europe and blinded many patients with his surgeries. Taylor’s connection to music was through his surgeries on two of the most famous Baroque composers: Johann Sebastian Bach (1685-1750) and George Frederick Handel (1685-1759). Bach had a painful eye disorder and after two surgeries by Taylor, Bach was blind. Handel had poor or absent vision prior to Taylor’s surgery, and his vision did not improve after surgery. The connection between ophthalmology and music spans over three centuries from the surgeries of Taylor to the musical passion of Ewing. Ewing E. Cecil Cameron Ewing. BMJ 2006; 332(7552):1278. Jackson DM. Bach, Handel, and the Chevalier Taylor. Med Hist 1968; 12(4):385-93. Zegers RH. The Eyes of Johann Sebastian Bach. Arch Ophthalmol 2005; 123(10):1427-30.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Schneuer ◽  
Elizabeth Milne ◽  
Sarra E. Jamieson ◽  
Gavin Pereira ◽  
Michele Hansen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document