Clinical performance and margin analysis of Ariston pHc versus Solitaire I as posterior restorations after 1 year

2001 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 139-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anja-Regina Braun ◽  
Roland Frankenberger ◽  
Norbert Krämer
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Posterior Restorations ◽  
Margin Analysis

scholarly journals Clinical Performance of a Bioactive Restorative Material vs a Glass Hybrid Restorative in Posterior Restorations in High-risk Caries Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 292-300
Author(s):  
Hassan Hassanein ◽  
Mai Akah ◽  
Heba Hamza ◽  
Mona M Eissa ◽  
Mai M Yousry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Restorative Material ◽  
Posterior Restorations

Early clinical performance of resin cements in glass-ceramic posterior restorations in adult vital teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 123 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-70
Author(s):  
Samantha Jéssica Lopes Sousa ◽  
Deborah Lousan do Nascimento Poubel ◽  
Liliana Vicente Melo de Lucas Rezende ◽  
Fabiana Tolentino Almeida ◽  
Isabela Porto de Toledo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Glass Ceramic ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Posterior Restorations

Two-Year Clinical Performance of a Low-Shrinkage Composite in Posterior Restorations

2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 591-600 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Baracco ◽  
J Perdigão ◽  
E Cabrera ◽  
L Ceballos
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Public Health Service ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Marginal Adaptation ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
The Us ◽  
System Data ◽  
Posterior Restorations ◽  
Self Etch

SUMMARY Objectives The aim of this study was to compare the two-year clinical performance of three restorative systems in posterior restorations, which included a low-shrinkage composite and both etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive strategies. Materials and Methods After signing an informed consent, 25 patients received three Class I (occlusal) or Class II restorations performed with one of three restorative systems: Filtek Silorane Restorative System, Adper Scotchbond 1 XT (a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive) with Filtek Z250, and Adper Scotchbond SE (a two-step self-etch adhesive) with Filtek Z250. All materials were applied following the manufacturer's instructions. Two blind observers evaluated the restorations at three different moments (baseline; and after one and two years) according to the US Public Health Service modified criteria. Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U-test were used to compare the behavior of the restorative systems, while Friedman and Wilcoxon tests were applied to analyze the intra-system data (p<0.05). Results The three restorative systems showed a statistically similar clinical performance at two years. Intra-system comparisons between baseline and two years showed declining marginal adaptation scores in the restorations placed with all systems. In addition, marginal staining and surface roughness scores were lower after two years for the restorations placed with Adper Scotchbond SE + Filtek Z250. Conclusions Although the clinical performance of Filtek Silorane was considered acceptable after two years, no advantage of the silorane-based resin over the methacrylate-based composite was found. Teeth restored with Adper Scotchbond SE showed a tendency for marginal staining, which may compromise the final color of the restorations.

578 Analytical and clinical performance of NT-proBNP immunoassay

2003 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-126
Author(s):  
C PRONTERA ◽  
C PASSINO ◽  
A IERVASI ◽  
G ZUCCHELLI ◽  
A CLERICO ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Performance
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document