Evaluation of a novel radioimmunoassay using125I-labelled human recombinant GAD65 for the determination of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65) autoantibodies

2000 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. Marcovina ◽  
M. Landin-Olsson ◽  
A. Essen-Möller ◽  
J. P. Palmer ◽  
Å. Lernmark
Diabetologia ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 1091-1098 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Falorni ◽  
M. Ackefors ◽  
C. Carlberg ◽  
T. Daniels ◽  
B. Persson ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 50 (8) ◽  
pp. 1378-1382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Palomer ◽  
Dídac Mauricio ◽  
José Rodríguez-Espinosa ◽  
Edgar Zapico ◽  
Carme Mayoral ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Autoantibodies for the 65-kDa form of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65) and protein tyrosine phosphatase-like protein (IA-2) are measured for risk prediction and diagnosis of autoimmune diabetes mellitus. There is a lack of adequate nonisotopic alternatives to the most widely used method for both autoantibodies, which is a radiobinding assay (RBA). Methods: We compared two commercially available immunoassays, an ELISA and a time-resolved immunofluorometric assay (TR-IFMA), with RBA. Results: We found excellent agreement between the RBA and ELISA for measurement of GAD65 autoantibodies (GADAs); they showed comparable analytical precision in the cutoff range and achieved similar diagnostic specificity. The ELISA identified more GADA-positive individuals among patients with new-onset type 1 diabetes than did the RBA [89% (95% confidence interval, 78–95%), vs 71% (58–82%); P <0.03]. For IA-2 autoantibodies (IA-2As), only the TR-IFMA achieved analytical performance and diagnostic accuracy comparable to that of the RBA. These results with the GADA ELISA and IA-2A TR-IFMA were consistent with those obtained blindly in the Diabetes Antibody Standardization Program 2003. The performance of the GADA TR-IFMA and IA-2A ELISA was unsatisfactory, and these tests were not subjected to clinical evaluation. Conclusions: The GADA ELISA and IA-2A TR-IFMA behave comparably with RBA and are thus suitable for use in the clinical laboratory.


2005 ◽  
Vol 153 (6) ◽  
pp. 901-906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matti S Ronkainen ◽  
Taina Härkönen ◽  
Jaakko Perheentupa ◽  
Mikael Knip

Objective: A humoral autoimmune response to glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65) is common both in patients with type 1 diabetes and in those with the autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy (APECED) syndrome, while overt type 1 diabetes is relatively rarely diagnosed in APECED patients. The aim of this study was to assess whether this difference in the incidence of type 1 diabetes is associated with variability in the humoral immune response to GAD65, one of the major autoantigens in type 1 diabetes. Methods: Epitope- and isotype-specific GAD65 autoantibodies were analysed in 20 patients with APECED and 20 patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes alone by radiobinding assays. Results: GAD65 autoantibodies targeted the middle and carboxy-terminal regions of GAD65 and occasionally the amino-terminal region in the APECED patients and comprised mainly the IgG1 subclass and less frequently the IgG2 and IgG4 subclasses. The profile of epitope- and isotype-specific GAD65 autoantibodies was similar in type 1 diabetes and APECED, except that IgG2 subclass antibodies were observed more often and at higher levels in the patients with type 1 diabetes alone (P < 0.05). None of the measured parameters separated APECED patients with type 1 diabetes from those without type 1 diabetes. Conclusion: APECED-associated humoral autoimmunity to GAD65 does not differ markedly from that observed in type 1 diabetes; only IgG2-GAD65 antibodies may be more closely associated with the latter entity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document